Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
David Sienkiewicz -- The Reincarnation of Judas Iscariot
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ed Conrad  
View profile  
 More options Aug 19 2002, 8:49 am
Newsgroups: alt.current.events, school.teacher, alt.radio.networks.npr, sci.bio
From: edcon...@shenhgts.net (Ed Conrad)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 12:04:55 GMT
Local: Mon, Aug 19 2002 8:04 am
Subject: David Sienkiewicz -- The Reincarnation of Judas Iscariot

Attorney David Sienkiewicz:

You certainly have a big mouth but you're really small potatoes.

You ought to be ashamed of yourself for so vigorously denying
the truth -- that man indeed is as old as coal, as the substantial
physical evidence (photos galore below) proves beyond the shadow
of a doubt.

As an educated person, you MUST know that your theory of man's
evolution is a figment of the Scientific Establishment's imagination
(for its self-serving purpose, to keep a Creator -- a Superor
Intelligence -- locked in the closet.)

Have you NO shame for so vigorously propogating a theory that
should long ago have been hauled to the landfill, a theory that has
long poisoned the minds of men.

You cannot be that blinded and bullheaded unless you have
an ulterior motiive to act like the boob that you are, so I will
repeat. You are a paid employee of one of the tentacles of the
Scientific -- whoops, Pseudoscientific -- Establishment.

This is your ONLY reason for living in front of your computer day and
night, making criminal accusations against anyone who seriously
threatens your bosses' falsified theory.

Lawyers are greedy, no question, but you, Sienkiewicz, are the King
of the Hill.

Haven't you made ENOUGH of a small fortune as a working attorney
for countless years? Aren't you satisified that you own a couple of
houses and three-four new cars and have a very healthy bank account?

Deny my accusation all you want, but beware -- I'm a lot smarter
than you think I am.

After all,  didn't I catch Andrew Macrae in his dishonest shenanigans,
tampering with physical evidence -- and am I not hot on the
trail of Paul Myers as a highly probable co-conspirator, Macrae's
partner-in-crime?.

After all, didn't I catch the University of California at Berkeley in
their deceitful, dishonest shenanigans?

Didn't I also lay on the line the deceit and deception by the
so-called "prestigious" Smithsonian Institution, the unscrupulous
manner in which it behaves when physical evidence threatens
to upset its applecart?

Now, Sienkiewicz, I shall turn the trail to you.

You see, whatever payments have been made to you MUST
be documented because the fact is, it's TAXPAYER'S MONEY
if you're on the payroll of the Pseudoscientific Establishment --
that's how it works.

I shall be in touch with the Government Accounting Office,
which, by law, is committed to provide that information.

I have no doubt there is a record of payments to you for the
incredibly long hours you have labored to defend a farce and, while
doing it, assassinate the character of someone -- me -- seeking
neither dollars nor fame but only the truth.

LET ME MAKE THIS PERFECTLY CLEAR, YOU BONEHEAD.
I HAVE TOLD NOT ONE SINGLE LIE IN ANYTHING I HAVE
EVER SAID OR WRITTEN CONCERNING MY DEALINGS
WITH EXPERTS OR LABORATORY TESTING, AND THAT
INCLUDES AMERICAN MEDICAL LABORATORIES.

Your accusations that I have lied, even once, is a MONUMENTAL
lie.

That you have called me a liar approximately a zillion times in
your postings cannot -- and will not-- be dismissed that easily.
You cannot -- and will not --get away with it.

This is NOT a threat. It's a promise.

Meanwhile, FYI, you and I are done exchanging barbs in  (talk.origins
r any other news group. If I do respond to one of your vicious
postings, it will be with the full force of my venom, and you ain't
seen nothing yet.

You are not worth my time and I want nothing further to do with
a scumbag like you -- unless the live prime-time TV debate becomes
reality and your bosses want you to represent them, which would be the
worst mistake they can ever make.

You see, you don't stand a beggar-man's chance of outdueling me, since
-- among other things -- you will have NO physical evidence to back
you up, and you'll get tongue-tied in your lies and fabrication.

The bottom line is that YOU, Stenkiewicz, are a pseudoscientist
who is head and shoulders among your pseudoscientist cronies.
At least the vast majority aren't on anyone's aspecial payroll.
They're in opposition to the truth because they've either been
brainwashed, are trying to protect their vested interests or their
craniums have turned to fossilizd slime.

Meanwhile, Sienkiewicz, have you no concern for the little kids of
today and the little kids of tomorrow  whose minds are -- and will be
-- warped by the facetious ramblings of you and your bosses, the
Pseudsoscientific Establishment, as you protect the colossal lie of
the evolution of man?.

You have NO regard for truth. You have NO respect for integrity. You
are light years from being fair and openminded. The almighty dollar
is first and foremost. Same, shame, a thousand times shame!

Actually, you are nothing but a squirmin' vermin. You have sold your
soul for 30 pieces of silver, a 21st century version of Judas Iscariot
who probably would spit on you if had the chance

Meanwhile, while I am will begin getting hot on your trail, do not
expect any direct responses. You are a proverbial pain in the ass and,
in reality, a giant thorn in the pseudoscientists' rear end, quite an
embarassment to anyone who at least pretends to be fair and
openminded.

Of couse, there are few fair and openminded people who
post to talk.origins, But, via deja.com, more and more people in all
walks of life are becoming blatantly aware of the scum that you are.

They are laughing at you ou and your colleageues squealing when caught
in a trap and shocked at how you all have incredible disregard for
physical evidence proving your theory is a total farce.

You are dead in the water, Sienkiewicz. You're in the same boat as
your outrageously preposterous theory of the evolution of man. You are
up the river without a paddle, and the tsunami that's coming isn't
that far away.

Ed Conrad

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

>  PHYSICAL EVIDENCE DEBUNKS EVOLUTION OF MAN

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Here is but the tip of the iceberg of the petrified bones, teeth and
several soft organs -- some human -- that were discovered between
anthracite coal veins in Pennsylvania. A Golden Rule of Geology is
that coal is a minimum of 280 million years old and that anthracite
is the oldest, therefore even older.

                                 ----0----

> "Any profession that does not supply its own
>  criticism and iconoclasm will discover that someone
>  else will do the job, and usually in a way it does not like."
>           -- Norman Macbeth, in his book "Darwin Retried"

                         =============

> "The right to search for truth implies also a duty;
>  one must not conceal any part of what one has
>  recognized to be true."
>                                                -- Thomas Edison

                     ==============

> "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our
>  wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions,
>  they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."
>     -- John Adams, defense attorney, Boston Massacre, 1770

                    ==============

> "They have a skeleton in their closet, Ed,
>   and they don't want to open the door."
>              -- Clayton Lennon (1900-1996), philosopher

==============================================

>             ALL SPECIMENS FOUND BETWEEN
>           PENNSYLVANIA'S ANTHRACITE VEINS
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)

This specimen was identified as a petrified human cranium,
a skull with the eyesockets broken off, by the late Dr. Wilton
Krogman, one of the world's leading human anatomists and author
of "The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine." He is shown
examining it in the second photo. Moments after the photo was taken,
a medical doctor walked into the room at the Cooper Clinic in
Lancaster, Pa., and Krogman invited him over to see "the oldest human
skull ever found."

A CATscan of the above specimen revealed a second protrusion
that isn't visible to the naked eye. It showed it is located precisely
where it would be expected to be found in a human cranium.
That report follows:

This specimen also had tested positive for the presence of Haversian
canals under microscopic scrutiny. Additionally, American Medical
Laboratories in Chantilly, Va., performed testing of calculus analysis
by crystallography and revealed that it contains "a composition of
dried blood intermingled with a few small crystals resembling calcium
oxalate dihydrate."

That report follows:

=============================================

Another petrified human skull -- this one embedded in a boulder
that weights some 3,000 pounds. It was found within 100 feet of the
previous skull and a year later, also having come from between
anthracite veins in Schuylkill County, Pa.  I

A microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
reveal the presence of Haversian canals. This is the same
specimen that was emphatically denied as being bone by
the Smithsonian Institution. It earlier had stated that
microscopic examination of the cell structure is required,
then ignored that test completely and responded by saying
it had performed "x-ray analysis" which, it deceitfully claimed,
confirmed that the specimen is not bone. The fact is, "x-ray analysis"
is not an appropriate test to determine whether an object is bone.

=============================================

A petrified human femur still in shale, a near-cousin to coal, which
also had been removed from between anthracite veins. Portions of
the bulb ends have broken off.

============================================

This specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by Wilton
Krogman. It contains Haversian canals, the telltale sign of bone,
embarrassing Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, who had
performed fraudulent testing for cellular structure. For his test
results, he had used a meticulously prepared ground section that had
been prepared from a rock or concretion.

A scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used to examine
the inner surface features of this specimen to compare it with
cadaver bone at the same power magnification.  Here are the
SEM  photos at 2,000X.

This is the same specimen that Andrew Macrae played fraudulent games
with. He then posted photos of ground sections on his web page,
claiming they were views of the cellular structure of the specimen and
insisting it wasn't bone because no circles (Haversian canals) could
be found. However, the photo beneath it taken later shows it DOES
contain circles -- Haversian canals --- and, therefore, IS petrified
bone. It was just one of several fraudulent scientific and/or
deceiving tests conducted on some of these specimens by members
of the Scientifiic Establishment. The photo on the left in the
following URL is what Macrae posted. The next two show what
a ground section really looks like.

Additionally, American Medical Laboratories had performed calculus
analysis by crystallography on this particular specimen and reported
that it "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."

That report follows:

==============================================

An assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions of
petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:

==============================================

A human lung, petrified:

============================================

A pair of petrified fetuses. The large one, which has been transformed
to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2 inches in length.

=============================================

A petrified gall bladder, with  a CATscan later revealling the
presence of a gall stone inside.

This is one of the specimens that was tested by American
Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.
It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
the specimen it tested is petrified).

That report follows:

=============================================

Portion of dinosaur foot embedded in anthracite-bearing shale:

============================================

This was the very first discovery of petrified bone in coal-bearing
Carboniferous strata in June 1981. It resembled a giant skull and
the Smithsonian expressd an interest in examining
it personally. However, its experts dismissed it as a rock or
concretion without any testing whatsoever, not even revealing that
a microscopic study of cell structure would accurately identify
whether it is bone. Later, a pair of petrified teeth -- a premolar and
a canine -- were found inside the jaw area. One was subjected to an
infrared scan which revealed its origin is that of a bone or a tooth.

The premolar that was found inside the jaw area:

============================================

A petrified handcrafted wooden handle, which has been transformed
to anthracite, found between coal veins.

============================================

A portion of petrified bone still in slate (or shale), near cousin of
coa, that confirms the bone is older than the material in which
it is embedded:

============================================

A giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:

These specimens and the honest testing results prove, beyond the
shadow of a doubt, that man and large land animals existed
while coal was being formed.

This is NOT theory and rhetoric, which is what the pseudoscientists
have used to brainwash the common man. It is physical evidence,
which is what science is supposed to be all about.

Ed Conrad

=========================================================

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google