Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PZ Myers, Andrew MacRae should apologize to Ed Conrad

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Jan 3, 2011, 4:03:04 AM1/3/11
to
PZ Myers, Andrew MacRae should apologize to Ed Conrad

Dr. PZ Myers and Dr. Andrew MacRae wrote two articles (notes 1 & 2 )
claiming Mr. Ed Conrad’s “Carboniferous fossils” are just rocks. For
over ten years many evolutionists cited their articles as proof
against Mr. Ed Conrad. However, my article (note 3) has shown the two
doctors were terribly wrong, because Haversian canals (a sure sign of
fossil bone) were found in Mr. Ed Conrad’s Carboniferous fossils. The
Haversian canals were found in the two doctors’ own micrographs as
shown below:

Figure 1: Dr.PZ Myers’ micrograph, labelled by me for Haversian canals
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588690160&p=69
Photo source: http://homepage.mac.com/myers/misc/bone.html

Figure 2: Dr. Andrew MacRae’s micrograph, labelled by me for Haversian
canals http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634845&p=61
Photo source: http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/th96-001_ts3xn.jpeg

Long ago I pointed out their mistakes, but they have never apologized
to Mr. Ed Conrad. They are the shame of evolutionists.

Note 1: See Dr. P.Z. Myers’ article claiming Mr. Ed Conrad’s “fossils”
are just rocks, at
http://homepage.mac.com/myers/misc/bone.html

Note 2: See Dr. Andrew MacRae’s article
“Carboniferous human bones -- an evaluation” at
http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/carbbones.html

Note 3: See my article “A human skull cap of 300 million years ago” at
http://wretchfossil.blogspot.com/2010/02/human-skull-cap-of-300-million-years.html

Wretch Fossil

unread,
Jan 6, 2011, 12:20:08 AM1/6/11
to
On 1月3日, 下午5時03分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> PZ Myers, Andrew MacRae should apologize to Ed Conrad
>
> Dr. PZ Myers and Dr. Andrew MacRae wrote two articles (notes 1 & 2 )
> claiming Mr. Ed Conrad’s “Carboniferous fossils” are just rocks. For
> over ten years many evolutionists cited their articles as proof
> against Mr. Ed Conrad. However, my article (note 3) has shown the two
> doctors were terribly wrong, because Haversian canals (a sure sign of
> fossil bone) were found in Mr. Ed Conrad’s Carboniferous fossils. The
> Haversian canals were found in the two doctors’ own micrographs as
> shown below:
>
> Figure 1: Dr.PZ Myers’ micrograph, labelled by me for Haversian canalshttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588690160&p=69

> Photo source:http://homepage.mac.com/myers/misc/bone.html
>
> Figure 2: Dr. Andrew MacRae’s micrograph, labelled by me for Haversian
> canalshttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634845&p=61
> Photo source:http://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/th96-001_ts3xn...

>
> Long ago I pointed out their mistakes, but they have never apologized
> to Mr. Ed Conrad. They are the shame of evolutionists.
>
> Note 1: See Dr. P.Z. Myers’ article claiming Mr. Ed Conrad’s “fossils”
> are just rocks, athttp://homepage.mac.com/myers/misc/bone.html

>
> Note 2: See Dr. Andrew MacRae’s article
> “Carboniferous human bones -- an evaluation” athttp://www.geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/t_origins/carbbones/carbbones.html
>
> Note 3: See my article “A human skull cap of 300 million years ago” athttp://wretchfossil.blogspot.com/2010/02/human-skull-cap-of-300-milli...

PZ Myers cheated Ed Conrad with half magnification and false scale bar
in the micrograph Myers took of Ed's fossils.

See figure 1 above and Myers' original photo or the following:


Figure 1: Dr.PZ Myers’ micrograph, labelled by me for Haversian canals
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588690160&p=69
Photo source: http://homepage.mac.com/myers/misc/bone.html

That was cheating. No ethics at all. PZ Myers should be fired. He is a
modern Piltdown. The scale bar should be at least 200 microns, not 100
microns as Myers stated in his article. In other words, PZ Myers
pretended to have used same magnifications in all three images in his
article, but actually showed Ed's fossil micrograph at one half
magnification of the first micrograph (of human Haversian canals) in
his article. No wonder many people were cheated too, as people could
see clear, "large" human Haversian canals but not the blurry, dark
"small, half-sized" Haversian canals in Ed's fossil micrograph.

PZ Myers was finally caught cheating Ed and all people.

0 new messages