I've recently come in the possession of a painting that contains a vase
with yellow flowers, and I'd like to know what kind of flowers they are.
If you have a second, please check out
http://www.meulie.net/Fotootjes/2_paintings/painting1 and tell me your
(educated) guess. :)
Regards,
Evert Meulie
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
"Evert Meulie" <ev...@meulie.net> wrote in message
news:6f71f06f6f242deb45d...@mygate.mailgate.org...
I can see some similarity, I don't think they're the same... The tansy
seems to have its buds closer together than the kind on the
painting...
Thank you for your swift reply though! :)
Any more/other suggestions?
Regards,
Evert Meulie
"Tina Gibson" <gibs...@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:<bSwib.82068$9l5.25621@pd7tw2no>...
"Evert Meulie" <ev...@meulie.net> wrote in message news:<6f71f06f6f242deb45d...@mygate.mailgate.org>...
Gene Newcomb
The gross form of the inflorescence looks similar to that of Buddleia x
weyeriana, but the jizz is wrong for this.
The gross form of the inflorescence again looks similar to that of
Acacia, but the foliage is wrong for this.
I interpret the plant to have capitate clusters of flowers borne at
intervals along leafless flowering branches. I am assuming that the
foliage belongs to the same plant.
--
Stewart Robert Hinsley
> I interpret the plant to have capitate clusters of flowers borne at
> intervals along leafless flowering branches. I am assuming that the
> foliage belongs to the same plant.
+ + +
My first impression was Acacia, some species of which are cultivated in
fairly temperate regions:
http://www.beyond.fr/flora/mimosa.html
However this would require the foliage to be from a separate plant or the
painter to be unfaithful, neither of which can be precluded
PvR
--
David Hill
Abacus nurseries
www.abacus-nurseries.co.uk
elizabeth
"Gene Newcomb" <newc...@science.oregonstate.edu> wrote in message
news:3F8AF9FB...@science.oregonstate.edu...
Greetings,
Evert Meulie
Gene Newcomb <newc...@science.oregonstate.edu> wrote in message news:<3F8AF9FB...@science.oregonstate.edu>...
"Evert Meulie" <ev...@meulie.net> wrote in message
news:6f71f06f6f242deb45d...@mygate.mailgate.org...
"Evert Meulie" <ev...@meulie.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:6f71f06f6f242deb45d...@mygate.mailgate.org...
Regards,
Evert
"Peter Jason" <pa...@colonel.com.au> wrote in message news:<bmg78i$fu3$1...@otis.netspace.net.au>...
Apparently there are species with "leaves" which fit better, such as the
suggested
(http://www.floracyberia.net/spermatophyta/angiospermae/dicotyledoneae/mimos
aceae/acacia_retinoides.html), but it is not a good fit.
The most likely explanation is that the flowers in the picture are indeed
Acacia dealbata and the foliage is something else, but there is no
reality-check. The flowers are long gone (no DNA-sampling is possible). A
catalogue is not necessarily the answer, given the level of errors commonly
found in catalogues when it comes to such matters.
Getting an approximate date for the painting and comparing this to the
cultivation history of Acacia dealbata and other Acacia species in France
might help considerably.
PvR
+ + +
David Hill <da...@abacusnurseries.freeserve.co.uk> schreef