Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion t Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Henri Wilson  
View profile  
 More options Jul 29 2007, 7:10 pm
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.physics.relativity
From: HW@....(Henri Wilson)
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:10:26 GMT
Local: Sun, Jul 29 2007 7:10 pm
Subject: Re: t Re: Why are the 'Fixed Stars' so FIXED?
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:37:48 +0100, "George Dishman" <geo...@briar.demon.co.uk>
wrote:

>"Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
>news:vaeba3pl9hqs0qjd78503v12pbia8lo4uf@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:43:42 +0100, "George Dishman"
>> <geo...@briar.demon.co.uk>
>> wrote:

>>>"Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
>>>news:vfaaa3pv74ojps7lcnqorbf48k3jacav0m@4ax.com...
>>>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:09:15 +0100, "George Dishman"
>>>> <geo...@briar.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>"Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
>>>>>news:ofn7a3l4mh0n2jsm3fbud35o3vol4rvuvk@4ax.com...

>>>>>> No doubt some star DO go 'huff-puff' and change temperature as they
>>>>>> do.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> never argued otherwise,..... even though there is no decent theory
>>>>>> linking
>>>>>> expansion with temperature change.

>>>>>ROFL! Henry, that's a classic. Can I take it you
>>>>>have never pumped up a bicycle tyre then :-)))))

>>>>>That you think you can get away with claiming a
>>>>>degree in physics and still come out with crap
>>>>>like that is quite astonishing.

>>>> What's' wrong with it?

>>>".. there is no decent theory linking expansion with
>>>temperature change."

>>>Have you never heard of adiabatic expansion?

>> When would expansion actually take place?

>While the radius is increasing. There's more
>involved of course, for example there is a lag
>in the curve due to H+ ionisation in layers
>nearer the surface.

>> The outer layers would hardly be
>> affected ..

>You should study some of the references I gave
>you, the outer layer is most affected. If you
>have looked at the physics of musical instruments
>as I think you claimed, you should know the
>difference between a standing wave in a closed
>pipe and an open one. The surface is unconstrained
>so is a node of maximum displacement.

>> so according to you and Jerry, the light from the heated parts well
>> below the surface wouldn't get through.

>>> http://chem.ufl.edu/~itl/4411L_f00/gamma/gamma.html

>>>Do you know how a fridge works?

>> Thermodynamics is my spciality.

>ROFL, quoting you from above: ".. there is no decent
>theory linking expansion with temperature change."

Don't lie and snip George.
This is what I said:

"there is no decent theory linking expansion (of a cepheid) with its brightness
variation"

> :-)

>George

www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm

The difference between a preacher and a used car salesman is that the latter at least has a product to sell.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google