(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2' 32" W, 2700 feet
Web Page: <www.speckledwithstars.net/>
Horizontal lines are probably due to seeing effects with a small telescope,
with the star dancing around. We have (presumably) the same thing on
telescopes of 8-14 inches aperture.
Are these apochromatic refractors? We have tried this on a classical old
achromat but the residual CA (chromatic aberration), which doesn't matter
much for ordinary visual observing, does affect the dispersed spectrum focus
a lot and we have to change focus for different wavelengths outside the
range of good correction. It is best on reflectors, which lack CA. On
apochromats this should not be a problem either.
The other thing is that it works better for us with a 25-mm eyepiece than a
40-mm.
I'm assuming you are using the cylinder lens supplied with the correct
orientation, to make the lines perpendicular to dispersion.
--
Mike Dworetsky
(Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply)
With some prompting and exchanges on a spectroscopy group, I've managed to
catch some spectra for Vega and Arcturus with my DSLR.
I've abandoned the 6" in favor of SCTs, because of CA problems. The SCTs are
working well, but I need to get around the orientation problem. I had
noticed an uneven bluish cast around stars with the LXD AR-6. I'm told by a
fellow who seems to know the LXD AR-6 well that I can use a Cheshire tool to
square it away; however, I have my doubts. I used one a year ago on it to
correct a bad alignment. It helped, but left me with the bluish cast.
Another source tells me the Cheshire is really only meant for reflectors. He
tells me it needs shop work. I need to work this out to understand which is
right. In favor of the Cheshire approach, the fellow mentioned other tips
that will help. Unfortunately, he has yet to reveal what they are. They are
posted somewhere where I do not yet have access.