On May 22, 8:02 am, Wretch Fossil <
wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
> seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
> all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
> daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
> 3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
> the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.
>
> Ref. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515
>
> Ref. 2:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#A...
> Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
> states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
> on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
> the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
> the landings were in daylight.[7]”
>
> Ref. 3:
http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temperature-lunar-days-night.html
> Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
> daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
> lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
> Earth weeks long.”
>
> Read more at
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
The physically dark and naked moon is a highly charged item, and there
should have been considerable voltage differentials in addition to its
crystal dryness.
btw; you are simply too young and inexperienced to realize what Kodak
film is, and how it records images, which is actually a whole lot more
truth-telling than anything you've mentioned thus far. Our inability
to get safely to/from our moon and the taboo/nondisclosure as to the
EML1 are a couple of really big problems for those that'll insist that
each and every word of their Apollo era represents the whole truth and
nothing but the truth.
Only nowadays with a butt-load of fancy computers and sophisticated
thrusters in addition to packing extra fuel and powerful momentum
reaction gyros, can a truly fly-by-rocket lander function safely
enough to be trusted with any crew of humans and passengers.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus