Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

No Dirt Could Exist On U.S. Flags On The Moon

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Wretch Fossil

unread,
May 22, 2012, 11:02:04 AM5/22/12
to
Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.

Ref. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377 http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515

Ref. 2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#Absence_of_stars
Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
the landings were in daylight.[7]”

Ref. 3:
http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temperature-lunar-days-night.html
Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
Earth weeks long.”

Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Wretch Fossil

unread,
May 24, 2012, 11:37:11 AM5/24/12
to
On 5月22日, 下午11時02分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
> seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
> all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
> daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
> 3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
> the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.
>
> Ref. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377   http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515
>
> Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#A...
> Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
> states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
> on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
> the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
> the landings were in daylight.[7]”
>
> Ref. 3:http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temperature-lunar-days-night.html
> Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
> daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
> lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
> Earth weeks long.”
>
> Read more at  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on May 24, 2012: Static Charge Could Not Adhere Lunar Soil To
the American Flags

Another person suggested that the anomalies on the American flags
could have resulted from static charge from the solar wind. He claimed
that static charge could attract lunar soil/dirt/dust/particles to the
American flags on the Moon. The scenario was unlikely as explained
below.

Static charge from solar wind resulted in "a layer of suspended dust
about one meter above the lunar surface." (Ref. 1). However, the
anomalies on the American flags were about two meters high (Ref. 2).
Anyway, the American flag decal (about one meter from the ground, Ref.
3) on Lunar Module showed no signs of soil/dirt/dust/particles in this
image:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20469HR.jpg

Ref. 1: fifth line in abstract of this NASA article:
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100032922_2010034552.pdf
Ref. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044315525&p=78
Ref. 3:
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a16/AS16-113-18340HR.jpg

Wretch Fossil

unread,
May 26, 2012, 11:29:06 PM5/26/12
to
On 5月22日, 下午11時02分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
> seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
> all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
> daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
> 3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
> the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.
>
> Ref. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377   http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515
>
> Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#A...
> Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
> states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
> on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
> the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
> the landings were in daylight.[7]”
>
> Ref. 3:http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temperature-lunar-days-night.html
> Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
> daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
> lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
> Earth weeks long.”
>
> Read more at  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

Added on May 27:
No dirt could have these shapes of magnified neuron remains.

Shapes of magnified neuron remains on American flags on the Moon:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044309463&p=76
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044282671&p=67

Brad Guth

unread,
May 27, 2012, 9:29:32 AM5/27/12
to
On May 22, 8:02 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
> seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
> all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
> daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
> 3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
> the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.
>
> Ref. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377   http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515
>
> Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#A...
> Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
> states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
> on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
> the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
> the landings were in daylight.[7]”
>
> Ref. 3:http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temperature-lunar-days-night.html
> Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
> daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
> lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
> Earth weeks long.”
>
> Read more at  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

The physically dark and naked moon is a highly charged item, and there
should have been considerable voltage differentials in addition to its
crystal dryness.

btw; you are simply too young and inexperienced to realize what Kodak
film is, and how it records images, which is actually a whole lot more
truth-telling than anything you've mentioned thus far. Our inability
to get safely to/from our moon and the taboo/nondisclosure as to the
EML1 are a couple of really big problems for those that'll insist that
each and every word of their Apollo era represents the whole truth and
nothing but the truth.

Only nowadays with a butt-load of fancy computers and sophisticated
thrusters in addition to packing extra fuel and powerful momentum
reaction gyros, can a truly fly-by-rocket lander function safely
enough to be trusted with any crew of humans and passengers.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/Guth Venus

Wretch Fossil

unread,
May 30, 2012, 10:11:53 AM5/30/12
to
On 5月27日, 上午11時29分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
Added on May 30:
No dust particles/dusts/dirt/soil resemble remains of red blood cells,
 branching blood vessels, and neurons as shown in these Apollo images:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267474&p=51

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044274563&p=56

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267470&p=47

http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044274560&p=53

They are fossil cells, not minerals or rocks of Earth/Moon. No
electrostatic charge on the Moon could produce dirt of those shapes
and sizes.

Brad Guth

unread,
Jun 1, 2012, 9:32:01 AM6/1/12
to
On May 30, 7:11 am, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5月27日, 上午11時29分, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 5月22日, 下午11時02分,WretchFossil<wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Someone suggested that lunar dirt accounted for the anomalies (Ref. 1)
> > > seen on U.S.flags on the Moon. The explanation is impossible, because
> > > all Apollo astronauts carried out their activities on the Moon in
> > > daylight (Ref. 2), when the temperature is about 100 degrees C. (Ref.
> > > 3) and the flag would be bone dry. No moisture could have been left on
> > > the flag to adhere any“dirt” to the flag.
>
> > > Ref. 1:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627377  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315/21627515
>
> > > Ref. 2:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Examination_of_Apollo_Moon_photographs#A...
> > > Quote from Ref. 2:“In the Apollo 11 press conference, Neil Armstrong
> > > states that he was "never able to see stars from the lunar surface or
> > > on the daylight side of the moon by eye" [6] Stars were visible with
> > > the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of
> > > the landings were in daylight.[7]”
>
> > > Ref. 3:http://www.space.com/14725-moon-temperature-lunar-days-night.html
> > > Quote from Ref. 3: “Temperatures on the moon are very hot in the
> > > daytime, about 100 degrees Centigrade. A single "day" on the moon
> > > lasts about 28 Earth days, meaning the lunar daytime is nearly two
> > > Earth weeks long.”
>
> > > Read more at  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
>
> > Added on May 27:
> > No dirt could have these shapes of magnified neuron remains.
>
> > Shapes of magnified neuron remains on American flags on the Moon:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044309463&p=7...
>
> Added on May 30:
> No dust particles/dusts/dirt/soil resemble remains of red blood cells,
>  branching blood vessels, and neurons as shown in these Apollo images:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267474&p=51
>
> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044274563&p=56
>
> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267470&p=47
>
> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044274560&p=53
>
> They are fossil cells, not minerals or rocks of Earth/Moon. No
> electrostatic charge on the Moon could produce dirt of those shapes
> and sizes.
>
> Read more at  http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0

At least the soil is realistically depicted as near dark as coal, and
there's some kind of a bluish smoke or smog in the upper right hand
area, and it's certainly not ionized sodium (because that would be
amber/yellowish).
0 new messages