Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Understanding Einstein's simple derivation of the Lorentz Transformation
4 views
Skip to first unread message
NoEinstein
Apr 22, 2012, 2:16:15 PM4/22/12
to
On Apr 19, 10:57 pm, palsing <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 4:32 am, "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Apr.2012> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "palsing" <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:9def3fb7-6686-4076...@h12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 18, 4:51 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > (speed includes velocity;
> > > velocity does not include speed, though it is a speed.)
>
> > I don't think that is right, you have it backwards. Speed is a rate of
> > travel without a specified direction, and velocity establishes both
> > speed and direction. One is a scalar and one is a tensor.
>
> > I understand that you know this, it just didn't come out right... lookie
> > here...
>
> >http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1dkin/u1l1d.cfm
>
> > \Paul A
>
> > ====================================
> > Velocity is a vector. See
> > <http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1dkin/u1l1d.cfm>
>
> > I know that you know this, it came out wrong.
> > Androcles.
>
> Yep, it did...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
palsing: Congratulations for your honesty! — NE —
> On Apr 19, 4:32 am, "Androcles" <H...@Hgwrts.phscs.Apr.2012> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "palsing" <pnals...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:9def3fb7-6686-4076...@h12g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> > On Apr 18, 4:51 pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane <Space...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > (speed includes velocity;
> > > velocity does not include speed, though it is a speed.)
>
> > I don't think that is right, you have it backwards. Speed is a rate of
> > travel without a specified direction, and velocity establishes both
> > speed and direction. One is a scalar and one is a tensor.
>
> > I understand that you know this, it just didn't come out right... lookie
> > here...
>
> >http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1dkin/u1l1d.cfm
>
> > \Paul A
>
> > ====================================
> > Velocity is a vector. See
> > <http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/1dkin/u1l1d.cfm>
>
> > I know that you know this, it came out wrong.
> > Androcles.
>
> Yep, it did...- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
palsing: Congratulations for your honesty! — NE —
Tonico
Apr 22, 2012, 3:30:18 PM4/22/12
to
Idiot
NoEinstein
Apr 27, 2012, 11:48:56 PM4/27/12
to
>
> - Show quoted text -
Tonico: Shoot the messenger? You can't shoot the message, idiot!
> - Show quoted text -
Ha, ha, HA! — NE —
1treePetrifiedForestLane
May 10, 2012, 12:22:56 PM5/10/12
to
just Car Econ One. I was thinking about your say-so
on kinetic energy (which is totally preposterous,
for engineers).
given the shock abosrbers,
what is the general trajectory of the little eagle on the hood --
can it be solved with the (linear) Hooke's law of springs?
on kinetic energy (which is totally preposterous,
for engineers).
given the shock abosrbers,
what is the general trajectory of the little eagle on the hood --
can it be solved with the (linear) Hooke's law of springs?
1treePetrifiedForestLane
May 10, 2012, 10:08:30 PM5/10/12
to
I say, no;
why would you say, Yes -- Ford was wrong!
why would you say, Yes -- Ford was wrong!
1treePetrifiedForestLane
May 16, 2012, 12:26:14 AM5/16/12
to
Ford was wrong -- and I have translated Einstein
from German to English & back, again;
I am the greatest Dingleberry!
from German to English & back, again;
I am the greatest Dingleberry!
1treePetrifiedForestLane
May 18, 2012, 4:05:43 PM5/18/12
to
on the wayside o' the transuniversal 'opedia de net,
I may not "go over" when the googolplex changes it front-end
to the newsgroups, but you can pretend that I just "gave up,
arguing with a fool."
although, I'm going to miss arguing with the confirmerists and
the denierists in alt.global-warming. (you, sir, are one
of the former .-)
I may not "go over" when the googolplex changes it front-end
to the newsgroups, but you can pretend that I just "gave up,
arguing with a fool."
although, I'm going to miss arguing with the confirmerists and
the denierists in alt.global-warming. (you, sir, are one
of the former .-)
0 new messages