Moonless Night
Anonymous
+-------<11>04Gem33[3]---<10>06Tau37[2]---<9>06Ari39[1]---------+
| | | | |
| | Ald 15Tau00 | | |
| | | | |
| | | | OLi 0Pis25 |
<12>02Can26[4]--|-------------------------------|--[12]04Pis27<8>
| | Astrolog32 v. 2.02 chart | Ura 3Pis03r |
| | Moonless Night | Jup 1Pis26r |
| | Thu Oct 7 2010 3:00:00AM | MLi 16Aqu18 |
| Esp 28Can27 | Tehran, IR | Des 9Aqu45 |
<1>02Leo18[5]---|ST +03:30, 51:26'00E 35:40'00N|--[11]02Aqu18<7>
| | UT: 0:10:00, Sid.T: 3:57:47 | Nep 1Aqu14r |
| Asc 9Leo45 | Terrestrial Houses | |
| For 21Leo04 | Caelestial / Geocentric | |
| | Julian Day: 2455476.4792 | |
<2>04Vir27[6]---|-------------------------------|--[10]02Cap26<6>
| Moo 7Vir21 |/Ven 18Lib15 | | Ver 29Sag57 |
| Mer 11Vir02 |\Mar 20Lib02 | | MNo 11Sag55r |
| Sat 13Vir32 | | | TNo 11Sag46r |
| Sun 18Vir39 | | | Plu 7Sag58 |
+---------[7]06Lib39<3>---[8]06Sco37<4>---[9]04Sag33<5>---------+
Earth: 0.0000000~
Pluto: 32.0789819-
Neptune: 29.3313189-
Uranus: 19.1272492-
Saturn: 10.5536637+
Jupiter: 3.9927937-
Mars: 2.2742999- <=
Sun: 0.9996221+
Venus: 0.3403513+
Mercury: 1.3308310-
Moon: 0.0024038-
MNode: 0.0025696~
TNode: 0.0026034-
MLilith: 0.0027106~
OLilith: 0.0027584-
__________________________________________________________________
Friday December 21st, 2012 anno Domini is 870 days away & counting.
The final worldly pope, Benedict XVI is 30,425 days old & counting.
In Vigilance,
Daniel Joseph Min
http://www.angelfire.com/moon2/danieljosephmin/
--
I do not subscribe to usenet newsgroups. Reply
via email, <mailto:danieljosephmin@**PRIVATE**>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBTFcCrZljD7YrHM/nEQIArQCgxqhvACeQ6So4r9aVOBR1nkfKWlEAmwYM
agW+zwN5Psuco9jorNP9Zaq5
=w9Pc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Anonymous
<nob...@remailer.paranoici.org>:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi, Danny.
<snip Miniocy>
>Friday December 21st, 2012 anno Domini is 870 days away & counting.
Uh-huh. And when we're all still here on 22 Dec 2012 how do
you intend to spin the fact?
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
Sjouke Burry
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Has anyone seen Min's straitjacket? It seems he lost it again.
The Chief Instigator
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Anonymous
><nob...@remailer.paranoici.org>:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hi, Danny.
>
><snip Miniocy>
>
>>Friday December 21st, 2012 anno Domini is 870 days away & counting.
>
> Uh-huh. And when we're all still here on 22 Dec 2012 how do
> you intend to spin the fact?
I'm waiting for the day before, as it'll be my wife's birthday (she'll be 61
that day, and I'll be 58 and seven months). Min's been a consistent kook
ever since he slipped into Usenet not long after I got to it 21 years ago.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@prismnet.com) Houston, TX
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 3, Houston 2 (April 11)
NEXT GAME: The 2010-11 opener vs. TBA, October 8
Autymn D. C.
Morten Reistad
Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC), the following
>appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Anonymous
><nob...@remailer.paranoici.org>:
>
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Hi, Danny.
>
><snip Miniocy>
>
>>Friday December 21st, 2012 anno Domini is 870 days away & counting.
>
>Uh-huh. And when we're all still here on 22 Dec 2012 how do
>you intend to spin the fact?
The Mayan calendar goes from 12.20.20.18.20 to 13.1.1.1.1 on
that date. Except as a reason to have a swell party to rival
y2k, it is nothing special. Except it happens rarely, the last
time was around AD 1600. All the more reason to have a party for
the Mayans; a people that deserve a celebration.
The calendar does not end. It even has provisions for the
date after 20.20.20.18.20, which will be 2.1.1.1.1.1. In some
3280 years time. Except for using base 20 and 18, it is not
much different from the normal astronomical day count.
I am much more worried about the consequences of running out of
ipv4 addresses, in about 319 days. 233.834.000 ipv4 addresses
left. Get yours before it is too late. Or get a few billion of
ipv6 addresses, and start your upgrade.
Written on the 12.19.17.2.2. http://www.pagetworld.co.uk/mayan.php
-- mrr
Bob Casanova
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Autymn D. C."
<lysd...@sbcglobal.net>:
>What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
$3, I believe.
Martin Brown
> What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
Not the full shilling.
See http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/shilling?view=uk
Please kill file him - you cannot argue with a moron.
Regards,
Martin Brown
George
> On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:40:47 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by "Autymn D. C."
>
> >What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
>
> $3, I believe.
The Chief Instigator
> What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
No telling, but back when he got going, he was somewhere in the Rockies, but
I could agree with another respondent's concise estimation: $3, even though
that might be a bit overpriced. ;)
Bob Casanova
sci.skeptic, posted by The Chief Instigator
<pat...@io.com>:
>On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:40:47 -0700 (PDT), Autymn D. C. <lysd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
>
>No telling, but back when he got going, he was somewhere in the Rockies, but
>I could agree with another respondent's concise estimation: $3, even though
>that might be a bit overpriced. ;)
Well, yeah, but I was actually thinking of the well-known
quotation about "$3 bills".
The Chief Instigator
> On 05 Aug 2010 05:43:25 GMT, the following appeared in
> sci.skeptic, posted by The Chief Instigator
><pat...@io.com>:
>
>>On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:40:47 -0700 (PDT), Autymn D. C. <lysd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>> What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
>>
>>No telling, but back when he got going, he was somewhere in the Rockies, but
>>I could agree with another respondent's concise estimation: $3, even though
>>that might be a bit overpriced. ;)
>
> Well, yeah, but I was actually thinking of the well-known quotation about
> "$3 bills".
Actually, the Republic of Texas used those in its decade of existence, but
they've been worthless for 165 years, so far.
rob
> ....................................................................................
> Well, yeah, but I was actually thinking of the well-known
> quotation about "$3 bills".
Maybe gotta be real old? Hell, I got it instantly! lol
Prai Jei
continuum:
> In article <enrg565ee9g9ijrqg...@4ax.com>,
> Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
>>On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 04:33:45 +0000 (UTC), the following
>>appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Anonymous
>><nob...@remailer.paranoici.org>:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>Hi, Danny.
>>
>><snip Miniocy>
>>
>>>Friday December 21st, 2012 anno Domini is 870 days away & counting.
>>
>>Uh-huh. And when we're all still here on 22 Dec 2012 how do
>>you intend to spin the fact?
>
> The Mayan calendar goes from 12.20.20.18.20 to 13.1.1.1.1 on
> that date. Except as a reason to have a swell party to rival
> y2k, it is nothing special. Except it happens rarely, the last
> time was around AD 1600. All the more reason to have a party for
> the Mayans; a people that deserve a celebration.
>
> The calendar does not end. It even has provisions for the
> date after 20.20.20.18.20, which will be 2.1.1.1.1.1.
Not 1.1.1.1.1.1?
The date to worry about is 19 January 2038 when the count of seconds since
the start of January 1970 (the beginning of time in *x systems) overflows
the signed 32-bit integer. Unlike the Mayan calendar, there is no higher
significant bit available.
--
ξ:) Proud to be curly
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
Puppet_Sock
> On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:46:39 -0700, Bob Casanova <nos...@buzz.off> wrote:
> > On 05 Aug 2010 05:43:25 GMT, the following appeared in
> > sci.skeptic, posted by The Chief Instigator
>
> >>On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:40:47 -0700 (PDT), Autymn D. C. <lysde...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >>> What denomination is Daniel Min, if any?
>
> >>No telling, but back when he got going, he was somewhere in the Rockies, but
> >>I could agree with another respondent's concise estimation: $3, even though
> >>that might be a bit overpriced. ;)
>
> > Well, yeah, but I was actually thinking of the well-known quotation about
> > "$3 bills".
>
> Actually, the Republic of Texas used those in its decade of existence, but
> they've been worthless for 165 years, so far.
They have some value as collectors items.
http://www.crutchwilliams.com/RepublicOfTexas.htm
Socks
Androcles
"Puppet_Sock" <puppe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b857c068-2bdf-4f53...@p7g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
http://www.crutchwilliams.com/RepublicOfTexas.htm
============================================
That $20 bill with the 10% compound interest issued in 1839
http://www.crutchwilliams.com/RoTx/PriceList/H19_2184o.jpg
is today worth
$239,430,326.50
The £50 bill is worth 2.5 times as much.
$598,575,816.20
1839 $20.00
1840 $22.00
1841 $24.20
1842 $26.62
1843 $29.28
1844 $32.21
1845 $35.43
1846 $38.97
1847 $42.87
1848 $47.16
1849 $51.87
1850 $57.06
1851 $62.77
1852 $69.05
1853 $75.95
1854 $83.54
1855 $91.90
1856 $101.09
1857 $111.20
1858 $122.32
1859 $134.55
1860 $148.00
1861 $162.81
1862 $179.09
1863 $196.99
1864 $216.69
1865 $238.36
1866 $262.20
1867 $288.42
1868 $317.26
1869 $348.99
1870 $383.89
1871 $422.28
1872 $464.50
1873 $510.95
1874 $562.05
1875 $618.25
1876 $680.08
1877 $748.09
1878 $822.90
1879 $905.19
1880 $995.70
1881 $1,095.27
1882 $1,204.80
1883 $1,325.28
1884 $1,457.81
1885 $1,603.59
1886 $1,763.95
1887 $1,940.34
1888 $2,134.38
1889 $2,347.82
1890 $2,582.60
1891 $2,840.86
1892 $3,124.94
1893 $3,437.44
1894 $3,781.18
1895 $4,159.30
1896 $4,575.23
1897 $5,032.75
1898 $5,536.03
1899 $6,089.63
1900 $6,698.60
1901 $7,368.46
1902 $8,105.30
1903 $8,915.83
1904 $9,807.41
1905 $10,788.16
1906 $11,866.97
1907 $13,053.67
1908 $14,359.04
1909 $15,794.94
1910 $17,374.43
1911 $19,111.88
1912 $21,023.06
1913 $23,125.37
1914 $25,437.91
1915 $27,981.70
1916 $30,779.87
1917 $33,857.85
1918 $37,243.64
1919 $40,968.00
1920 $45,064.80
1921 $49,571.29
1922 $54,528.41
1923 $59,981.26
1924 $65,979.38
1925 $72,577.32
1926 $79,835.05
1927 $87,818.56
1928 $96,600.41
1929 $106,260.45
1930 $116,886.50
1931 $128,575.15
1932 $141,432.66
1933 $155,575.93
1934 $171,133.52
1935 $188,246.87
1936 $207,071.56
1937 $227,778.72
1938 $250,556.59
1939 $275,612.25
1940 $303,173.47
1941 $333,490.82
1942 $366,839.90
1943 $403,523.89
1944 $443,876.28
1945 $488,263.91
1946 $537,090.30
1947 $590,799.33
1948 $649,879.26
1949 $714,867.19
1950 $786,353.91
1951 $864,989.30
1952 $951,488.23
1953 $1,046,637.05
1954 $1,151,300.75
1955 $1,266,430.83
1956 $1,393,073.91
1957 $1,532,381.30
1958 $1,685,619.43
1959 $1,854,181.38
1960 $2,039,599.51
1961 $2,243,559.47
1962 $2,467,915.41
1963 $2,714,706.95
1964 $2,986,177.65
1965 $3,284,795.41
1966 $3,613,274.95
1967 $3,974,602.45
1968 $4,372,062.70
1969 $4,809,268.96
1970 $5,290,195.86
1971 $5,819,215.45
1972 $6,401,136.99
1973 $7,041,250.69
1974 $7,745,375.76
1975 $8,519,913.34
1976 $9,371,904.67
1977 $10,309,095.14
1978 $11,340,004.65
1979 $12,474,005.12
1980 $13,721,405.63
1981 $15,093,546.19
1982 $16,602,900.81
1983 $18,263,190.89
1984 $20,089,509.98
1985 $22,098,460.98
1986 $24,308,307.07
1987 $26,739,137.78
1988 $29,413,051.56
1989 $32,354,356.72
1990 $35,589,792.39
1991 $39,148,771.63
1992 $43,063,648.79
1993 $47,370,013.67
1994 $52,107,015.03
1995 $57,317,716.54
1996 $63,049,488.19
1997 $69,354,437.01
1998 $76,289,880.71
1999 $83,918,868.78
2000 $92,310,755.66
2001 $101,541,831.23
2002 $111,696,014.35
2003 $122,865,615.78
2004 $135,152,177.36
2005 $148,667,395.10
2006 $163,534,134.61
2007 $179,887,548.07
2008 $197,876,302.88
2009 $217,663,933.16
2010 $239,430,326.48