#32 Luminet team made an error just as Johns Hopkins made an error on color of Universe; new book: "How the Universe is organized into Galaxies & Voids by the Atom Totality"
plutonium....@gmail.com
to how much more dense
the galaxies are in the Great Wall Zones compared to our Local Group
of galaxies and I
happened to stumble on this website.
---quoting http://members.aol.com/newssciencepage/041005_univshape.htm
In the September 2004 issue of the research journal Astronomy &
Astrophysics, a group of researchers write that they has found “hints”
of the structure Luminet described. If space is structured this way,
researchers believe that the cosmic microwave background should
exhibit a specific pattern called “matched circles.” This means that
as we peer into space, certain areas of the radiation should look the
same as other areas.
(snipped)
One outcome of the hypersphere framework is that objects leaving one
face of the dodecahedron come back in the opposite face, but rotated
partially. To be exact, the amount of the rotation is 36 degrees,
which also happens to be the angle by which your direction would
change if you turned a corner while walking along the edge of a
pentagon.
--- end quoting ---
For years now, since Luminet team has reported their dodecahedron
result, I have given them
the benefit of the doubt that the Cosmos is 12 faced dodecahedron and
I have doubled or 2X
the 6 lobes of 5f6. So I adjusted the plutonium atom to accomodate the
Luminet findings.
Six lobes of a 5f6 would give a cube not a dodecahedron, so I altered
my theory of 5f6 by saying
it is easy to 2X the 6 lobes to get 12 faces. That somehow the lobes
of 6 turn into a 12 faced
dodecahedron.
But, after reading that website and noticing that the Luminet team
offers a Experimental Testing
as to whether the Observable Cosmos obeys a Dodecahredon or whether it
obeys a Cube.
And fortunately that website speaks of a experimental test. It talks
of the "Matching Circles Test"
Now, if Luminet team is correct of a dodecahedron then the angle of 36
degrees should be
prominent somewhere of Equality or Duality in physics. I know of not
one single case where
there is duality of a 36 degree angle.
What I do know for sure is that in EM theory that electricity equals
magnetism or is the dual
of one another. And the angle that separates Electricity from
Magnetism such as the transverse
light wave or the Oersted Experiment is a 90 degree angle. In other
words, Quantum Mechanics
duality of Electricity and Magnetism is a "Matching Circle" and that
matching circle is not a
36 degree angle expected in a Dodecahredon but rather a 90 degree
angle expected of a
Universe that is shaped as a Cube.
So the Luminet team made a mistake somewhere in their calculations
around with the Microwave
Background radiation and forgot to apply a 1/2 correction for it is
not 12 faces but 6 faces.
Similarly in the early 2000s a Johns Hopkins team announced the
Observable Cosmos has
a pale green color but a Rochester Optics team pointed out they
neglected a correction factor
and now it is widely known the Cosmos is a silvery white color close
to the color of what
a sample of the metal plutonium looks like.
So, ever since Luminet's team announced Dodecahedron, I have been
giving them the benefit
of doubt and fixing my Plutonium Atom Totality to accomodate a
Dodecahedron, but now
that I see there is a Experimental Test to decide on whether
Dodecahedron or Cube, I see
that the Luminet Team was in error and the Plutonium Atom Totality was
correct all along
with a 6 faced Cosmos as a 6 lobed figure.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
porky_...@my-deja.com
> that the Luminet Team was in error and the Plutonium Atom Totality was
> correct all along
> with a 6 faced Cosmos as a 6 lobed figure.
>
nipple model?
plutonium....@gmail.com
"Matching Circles" would have all 6 lobes the same and allow a focused
concentration on the one lobe containing the Milky Way. Each lobe is
one electron
and the 5f6 is the last 6 electrons of 231Pu. Each lobe has a nipple
end closest
to the nucleus. And each lobe grows its galaxies as a double-slit
Dirac Radioactivity.
But one has to wonder where the other Electrons of a Plutonium Atom
Totality
stack up. What about the s and p and d and f orbitals. Are they hidden
in
nodes which we are forbidden to see? Is the Observable Universe
just the last electron of 5f6 or is it the last 6 electrons? A hint of
that answer was
in the last decade of the 20th century when Sandage found stars of 20
billion years
old and Freedman later found the age of the Cosmos as a mere 7 to 9
billion years
old. So there ensued a clash because they undermined the Big Bang, and
so Sandage
fudged his work to climb down from 20 billion years to that of around
14 and Freedman
was coerced to move up from 7 billion to that of 14 so that the Big
Bang community
could restore its dignity continue with their fake theory.
The data cannot be fudged or lied about, in that the Observable
Universe has layered ages
of stars older than the newest lobe of the Atom Totality. Because we
can see 20 billion year
old stars in a nearby lobe while the Milky Way lobe is only 7 billion
years old means that
we can observe at least two different electrons which are in two
different lobes of the 5f6 of 231Pu.
As the Atom Totality answers many old questions, a flood of new
questions
come in.