Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Exoplanet Mass Spectrum: New Data
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Robert L. Oldershaw  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 3:48 am
Newsgroups: sci.astro.research
From: "Robert L. Oldershaw" <rlolders...@amherst.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 12 07:47:38 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 3:47 am
Subject: Re: Exoplanet Mass Spectrum: New Data

On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 8:17:36 AM UTC-4, Eric Flesch wrote:
> On 09 Oct 12 "Robert L. Oldershaw" <edu> wrote:

> >That is what science is all about: ideas, predictions and testing.

> and refuting, and moving on...

------------------------------------------------------

Here is another indication of what is going on regarding the distributions of exoplanet parameters.

The Kepler mission has a huge bounty of exoplanet candidates and they are now checking to see which ones are actual planets (as opposed to other types of variable systems or transients).

The important point for this discussion is that they have published a histogram of the exoplanet candidates' radii. There is a single overwhelmingly dominant peak in the Neptune radius range.

When you combine the mass results of Mayor/Queloz with the radius results of the Kepler team, then I think you have a fairly strong argument that Discrete Scale Relativity's prediction of 8 x 10^-5 solar mass for the dominant peak of the exoplanet mass spectrum is being vindicated.

At this point I am not yet claiming total victory on this particular prediction (one of 14 definitive predictions, of which 4 are verifed or very strongly supported). However, one can see the light of knowledge rapidly approaching down at the end of the long dark tunnel.

Perhaps we need to 'refute and move on' from the old failing assumptions.

Robert L. Oldershaw
http://www3.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw
Discrete Scale Relativity


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.