The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.astro.research
From: Phillip Helbig---undress to reply <hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 12 08:54:11 GMT
Local: Tues, Oct 30 2012 4:54 am
Subject: Re: Cooray et al - A Possible Solution to IR/X-ray Correlation?
In article <mt2.0-26675-1351532...@hydra.herts.ac.uk>, Jos Bergervoet
<jos.bergerv...@xs4all.nl> writes: Interesting point. I admit that I normally don't think of, say,
> Can we be sure that there aren't even larger > numbers at extremely low frequencies? Wouldn't > slowly varying strong magnetic fields require > an enormous amount of photons? metre-wave radiation being photons, but of course it is. (What I mean is that the typical radio receiver is not a photon-counting device.) So, to answer your question, I don't know. What is true, though, is that most of the energy in radiation comes from [Mod. note: for observational constraints on the low-frequency radio
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||