<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research</id>
  <title type="text">sci.astro.research Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Forum in astronomy/astrophysics research. (Moderated)
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.astro.research/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.astro.research feed"/>
  <updated>2008-07-23T14:06:07Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Kent Paul Dolan</name>
  <email>xanth...@well.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-23T14:06:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/d6ac5b3a02a399f4/72c1eddf6429902f?show_docid=72c1eddf6429902f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/d6ac5b3a02a399f4/72c1eddf6429902f?show_docid=72c1eddf6429902f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Null Physics?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Joe wrote: &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; Just noticed in the latest Scientific American a 2 &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; page advertisement for a book, &amp;quot;Our Undiscovered &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; Universe&amp;quot; subtitled &amp;quot;Introducing Null Physics&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; The book has a web site at &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; I&#39;m no physicist but from looking at that web &lt;br&gt; &amp;gt; site- the subject/concept looks flakey. That&#39;s OK,
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Joe</name>
  <email>a...@xyz.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-07-22T09:24:33Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/d6ac5b3a02a399f4/0d24dce94eea4765?show_docid=0d24dce94eea4765</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/d6ac5b3a02a399f4/0d24dce94eea4765?show_docid=0d24dce94eea4765"/>
  <title type="text">Null Physics?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Just noticed in the latest Scientific American a 2 page advertisement for a &lt;br&gt; book, &amp;quot;Our Undiscovered Universe&amp;quot; subtitled &amp;quot;Introducing Null Physics&amp;quot;. The &lt;br&gt; book has a web site at &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.ourundiscovereduniverse.com&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt; I&#39;m no physicist but from looking at that web site- the subject/concept &lt;br&gt; looks flakey. That&#39;s OK, there&#39;s plenty of flakey scientists and non
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Thomas Smid</name>
  <email>thomas.s...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-06T19:40:57Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/cb1db399c32f69a5?show_docid=cb1db399c32f69a5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/cb1db399c32f69a5?show_docid=cb1db399c32f69a5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: CMB temperature: cooling down or... heating up???</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;lt;carlip-nos...@physics.ucdavis .edu&amp;gt; wrote in &lt;br&gt; I would consider the results presented in these papers as anything but &lt;br&gt; accurate. Most of the measurements presented in the first paper &lt;br&gt; (Srianand et al.) represent anyway only upper limits, and in addition &lt;br&gt; they use the COBE measurement of the present temperature to constrain
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Oh No</name>
  <email>n...@charlesfrancis.wanadoo.co.uk</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-06-05T08:16:40Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/93ab8a053adf6c58/72fdbb855df496e4?show_docid=72fdbb855df496e4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/93ab8a053adf6c58/72fdbb855df496e4?show_docid=72fdbb855df496e4"/>
  <title type="text">Two spiral arms go missing</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Here&#39;s an interesting press release: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2008-094&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Gorgeous map... &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/236084main_MilkyWay-full-&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; annotated.jpg &lt;br&gt; .. &lt;br&gt; Regards
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Paul Schlyter</name>
  <email>pau...@saaf.se</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-29T09:34:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/39f2c0fdd178b1cf/87e170b4ca1f7e1f?show_docid=87e170b4ca1f7e1f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/39f2c0fdd178b1cf/87e170b4ca1f7e1f?show_docid=87e170b4ca1f7e1f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Nibiru ecliptic event facts</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;mt2.0-24487-1211967...@hercul es.herts.ac.uk&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; There are no such events. Nibiru is a fantasy planet which does not exist.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>poorrichard</name>
  <email>poorrichar...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-29T09:35:32Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/6296132ec83afb23/8a90c79848eb6302?show_docid=8a90c79848eb6302</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/6296132ec83afb23/8a90c79848eb6302?show_docid=8a90c79848eb6302"/>
  <title type="text">{!!! SPAM ???} Re: Computing Upper-Limits for IRAS...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  To answer my own question: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://scanpiops.ipac.caltech.edu:9000/applications/Scanpi/index.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>poorrichard</name>
  <email>poorrichar...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-28T09:39:41Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/6296132ec83afb23/a1122ab6f1e0ef3b?show_docid=a1122ab6f1e0ef3b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/6296132ec83afb23/a1122ab6f1e0ef3b?show_docid=a1122ab6f1e0ef3b"/>
  <title type="text">Computing Upper-Limits for IRAS...</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Hello. I was wondering if someone would be so kind as to explain, or point &lt;br&gt; me to some reference that explains, how to determine the upper-limits for &lt;br&gt; censored objects in the IRAS surveys. &lt;br&gt; If I am not mistaken, the running rms was not kept track of because of the &lt;br&gt; limitations of the system then. So how does one get a good estimate of it?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Inews</name>
  <email>sono...@cox.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-28T09:43:14Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/39f2c0fdd178b1cf/f0702cdf9be38ffc?show_docid=f0702cdf9be38ffc</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/39f2c0fdd178b1cf/f0702cdf9be38ffc?show_docid=f0702cdf9be38ffc"/>
  <title type="text">Nibiru ecliptic event facts</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Seeking facts on sister solar system of Planet X (Nibiru) that will cross &lt;br&gt; our solar system&#39;s ecliptic by between February 2011 and March 2013. Also, &lt;br&gt; I am seeking astronomical coordinates of Nibiru as observed from position &lt;br&gt; 36° 10&#39;28.02&amp;quot;° N and 115° 14&#39;49.955&amp;quot;° &lt;br&gt; Not interested in opinion of &amp;quot;what may come&amp;quot;, but only interested to confirm
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Peter Holm</name>
  <email>pjwh...@yahoo.es</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-26T05:44:07Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/138b9b06de5217f7/09c4673954917372?show_docid=09c4673954917372</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/138b9b06de5217f7/09c4673954917372?show_docid=09c4673954917372"/>
  <title type="text">unnamed star cloud?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  This might sound presumptuous, but just in case it isn&#39;t: &lt;br&gt; On Google Sky I have run into something about which I believe that it &lt;br&gt; might exist, even though I have never heard about it before. And since &lt;br&gt; I don&#39;t know how to call it, I have provisionally dubbed it &amp;quot;Holm&#39;s &lt;br&gt; Cloud&amp;quot; (pardon, it&#39;s just for internal use). It appears to me as a
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Oldershaw</name>
  <email>rlolders...@amherst.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-21T09:14:59Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/0857121c862e151b/21cda3f363bc9690?show_docid=21cda3f363bc9690</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/0857121c862e151b/21cda3f363bc9690?show_docid=21cda3f363bc9690"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Fractal Cosmology&quot; entry in Wikipedia</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On May 19, 10:22 am, &amp;quot;Nicolaas Vroom&amp;quot; &amp;lt;nicolaas.vr...@pandora.be&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; The graphic you mention shows one of the beautiful and thought-provoking &lt;br&gt; images from deep within the M-set. It is *not* meant to directly &lt;br&gt; represent any actual physical object found in nature. The author of the &lt;br&gt; Wikipedia addition probably chose it for aesthetic reasons and for a
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>GSS</name>
  <email>gurcharn_san...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-21T09:09:24Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/8b4494bc35627a39/3f89139d8b9fcffd?show_docid=3f89139d8b9fcffd</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/8b4494bc35627a39/3f89139d8b9fcffd?show_docid=3f89139d8b9fcffd"/>
  <title type="text">[WWW] Request for Review of a pre-print book titled, &quot;Fundamental Nature of</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Friends, &lt;br&gt; I have been taking part in various sci.physics discussion forums on &lt;br&gt; usenet for almost a decade now. Even though I found these discussions &lt;br&gt; quite useful, still I failed to communicate my viewpoint to most of &lt;br&gt; the readers. Perhaps, communication of a certain viewpoint in bits and &lt;br&gt; pieces cannot be expected to &#39;stick&#39;, to have any permanent
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Nicolaas Vroom</name>
  <email>nicolaas.vr...@pandora.be</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-19T14:22:46Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/0857121c862e151b/45b36029794a2583?show_docid=45b36029794a2583</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/0857121c862e151b/45b36029794a2583?show_docid=45b36029794a2583"/>
  <title type="text">Re: &quot;Fractal Cosmology&quot; entry in Wikipedia</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  &amp;quot;rlolders...@amherst.edu&amp;quot; &amp;lt;rlolders...@amherst.edu&amp;gt; schreef in bericht &lt;br&gt; Is this really such a breakthrough ? &lt;br&gt; At &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_cosmology&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; we read: &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;In a wide variety of places, in fact almost anywhere they &lt;br&gt; look in the universe, people studying the heavens are &lt;br&gt; finding fractals or fractal-like structures.&amp;quot;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <email>carlip-nos...@physics.ucdavis.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-16T08:58:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/12f89ed3389a58c4?show_docid=12f89ed3389a58c4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/12f89ed3389a58c4?show_docid=12f89ed3389a58c4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: CMB temperature: cooling down or... heating up???</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Does your model predict anything about the past CMB &lt;br&gt; temperature? This can be measured -- for a very recent &lt;br&gt; and apparently quite accurate result, see the preprint &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.0116&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;, or for a different method, &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0208027&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt; Steve Carlip
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Richard Saam</name>
  <email>rds...@att.net</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-16T08:57:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/f580563cb29bd768?show_docid=f580563cb29bd768</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/f580563cb29bd768?show_docid=f580563cb29bd768"/>
  <title type="text">Re: CMB temperature: cooling down or... heating up???</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  And further confirmation of CMBR cooling vs universe age: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/A_Molecular_Thermometer_For_The_Distant_Universe_999.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Steve Willner</name>
  <email>will...@cfa.harvard.edu</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2008-05-16T08:57:45Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/86db971b934059f5?show_docid=86db971b934059f5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.astro.research/browse_thread/thread/90bf1fe05a8b80d4/86db971b934059f5?show_docid=86db971b934059f5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: CMB temperature: cooling down or... heating up???</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &amp;lt;mt2.0-600-1210838...@hercules .herts.ac.uk&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; By coincidence, I just saw an ESO press release reporting a &lt;br&gt; measurement of the CMB temperature at redshift 2.4. At this &lt;br&gt; redshift, the lines measured are from CO, not CN, but the idea is the &lt;br&gt; same. &lt;br&gt; The press release is at &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2008/pr-13-08.html&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
