NASA misidentified Mars salts in press conference.
Lin Liangtai
In the press conference of Sept. 29, 2008, NASA released a
photomicrograph (Ref. 1) taken by Phoenix Mars Lander. In the
photomicrograph, NASA wrote: “Mixed into the soil is a small amount –
about 0.5 percent- of white grains, possibly of a salt.”
The so-called “salt grains” are actually silt-sized ( 4 to 75
microns), but rounded, originating from the blood vessel remains (Fig.
1). NASA chose not to interpret the obvious cell remains in the blood
vessel remains (Arrow 6 in Fig. 1) and the obvious Haversian canals
(Arrows 1 to 5, Fig. 1), but tried to mislead the general public into
believing the Mars soils were just inorganic grains, etc.
Let me say clearly: NASA is pulling America down. NASA is trying to
delay confirming organics on Mars until it is authorized to launch
another rover to Mars. Three months from now, you will see what my
message means.
Fig. 1: marked with “salt grains” (claimed by NASA), cells and
Haversian canals
(claimed by me).
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=20&f=1555351406&p=116
Ref. 1: Photomicrograph and interpretation released by NASA in press
conference.
http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=36683&cID=322
BradGuth
> NASA misidentified Mars salts in press conference
>
> In the press conference of Sept. 29, 2008, NASA released a
>
> about 0.5 percent- of white grains, possibly of a salt.”
>
> The so-called “salt grains” are actually silt-sized ( 4 to 75
> microns), but rounded, originating from the blood vessel remains (Fig.
> 1). NASA chose not to interpret the obvious cell remains in the blood
> vessel remains (Arrow 6 in Fig. 1) and the obvious Haversian canals
> (Arrows 1 to 5, Fig. 1), but tried to mislead the general public into
> believing the Mars soils were just inorganic grains, etc.
>
> Let me say clearly: NASA is pulling America down. NASA is trying to
> delay confirming organics on Mars until it is authorized to launch
> another rover to Mars. Three months from now, you will see what my
> message means.
>
> Fig. 1: marked with “salt grains” (claimed by NASA), cells and
> Haversian canals
>
> Ref. 1: Photomicrograph and interpretation released by NASA in press
> conference.http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/images.php?gID=36683&cID=322
As you or most anyone half as smart as a 5th grader should know, Mars
has darn little surface salt to its name. If there was ever water on
Mars it had to have been mostly fresh water or of some other mineral
brine kind of soup or muck that was extremely low in salt, but
otherwise unusually paramagnetic if not actually rather magnetic.
There's also little if hardly any soil nitrogen to be hold, which is
also not a good sign of Mars ever having surface water or even surface
muck to contend with, unless contributed by some icy comets that
included nitrogen dioxides and salt.
It seems the grand ruse/sting of the mutually perpetrated cold-war
century continues as our good ship USS LOLLIPOP is sinking faster than
our artificial global inflation efforts can manage to bail it out.
Gee whiz, folks, I can't but wonder what the actual basis of our
ongoing demise is really caused by. I suppose, if I were to inform
you folks as to my interpretations as to such, I've have to kill those
I'd told these dark and scary forbidden secrets. (dear DARPA and DHS,
I was just kidding)
~ BG