Hi Sassan,
I've been in the same position myself at times. I guess the first question
would be, what do you want to observe? The solar system, deep space objects
such as galaxies, or both? Another question would be whether or not you
would want the scope to automatically track the stars or not? Believe it or
not, there can be an enormous price difference between auto tracking versus
manual and a planetary only scope versus one for both or deep sky.
I myself started off with a 4.25" reflector telescope that was handed down
from a family member. It was able to show me both the planets and deep
space. Of course, the cost was not a factor, but new the scope would have
been probably been within the $300-400 range.
Later, I graduated to a 10" Dobsonian, again around $400 at the time. This
scope lacked the clock drive that the 4.25" had, but it showed a lot of the
deep space objects in far more detail than the smaller scope would have.
In the price range you indicate, my next and final telescope also ran within
that range and it was a Celestron 9.25 on the GC-5 mount. The mount was
clock driven and the scope type pretty easily allows it to be used for both
deep space and planets. Best of all, it was compact due to the type of
design.
Of course, you do realize that objects you see in the eyepiece will
generally not look like photographs? Even with a large aperture telescope,
much of deep space will appear as a faint smudge. Planets like Jupiter and
Saturn are often exceptions, however, and will rival most photographs on a
night of good seeing.
I have only touched the basics of the basics here. My advice would be to do
your research first, perhaps visit a local astronomy club in your area to
get a feel for different types of telescopes, and then make your decision.
Good luck,
Jason
"ILoveKnowledge" <
ILoveKnowle...@spacebanter.com> wrote in message
news:ILoveKnowle...@spacebanter.com...