NASA ANNOUNCES TWO NEWS CONFERENCES TO DISCUSS THE 2011 BUDGET AND A BOLD NEW APPROACH TO EXPLORATION
WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold news conferences on Monday, Feb. 1, and Tuesday, Feb. 2, to discuss the fiscal year 2011 budget request and announce bold new developments in the nation's civil space effort.
Astronomy.FM Radio will carry these events live.
On Monday, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and Chief Financial Officer Beth Robinson will brief reporters about the agency's fiscal year 2011 budget during a teleconference at 12:30 p.m. US Eastern time (1730 UTC).
On Tuesday, Administrator Bolden, Dr. John Holdren, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, will introduce new commercial space pioneers, launching a game-changing way of developing technology to send humans to space.
The announcement will take place at 10 a.m. US Eastern time (1500 UTC) in the National Press Club's ballroom, located at 529 14th Street NW in Washington.
In addition to the two NASA events, Deputy Administrator Lori Garver will participate with Dr. Holdren in a briefing by the Office of Science and Technology Policy about the federal government's 2011 research and development budget. The briefing will take place at 1 p.m. US Eastern time (1800 UTC), Monday, Feb. 1 in the auditorium of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Summary of Events What: Fiscal Year 2011 budget briefing When: 12:30 p.m. EST on Monday, Feb. 1 Who: NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and Chief Financial Officer Beth Robinson
What: Briefing by the Office of Science and Technology Policy on the federal government's 2011 research and development budget When: 1 p.m. EST on Monday, Feb. 1 Who: NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver and Dr. John Holdren, assistant to the President for science and technology and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Where: The American Association for the Advancement of Science's auditorium
What: Newsmaker event at the National Press Club When: 10 a.m. EST on Tuesday, Feb. 2 Who: NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and Dr. John Holdren, assistant to the President for science and technology and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy Where: The National Press Club
NASA budget and supporting information will be posted at 12:30 p.m., Feb. 1, at: http://www.nasa.gov/budget
On Jan 31, 10:57 pm, SkyGuide <skyguide.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold news conferences on Monday, Feb. 1, and > Tuesday, Feb. 2, to discuss the fiscal year 2011 budget request and > announce bold new developments in the nation's civil space effort.
Despite the abandonment of the plan to return to the Moon and go to Mars... which, although regrettable, was not totally unexpected all along... this is not impossible. Unmanned space exploration returns a great deal of scientific knowledge at a fraction of the cost. Ultimately, we still need to send people into space to complete the task, but there is simply no compelling reason to go to Mars now like the one we had to go to the Moon.
And, of course, there has to be some way to get American astronauts to the ISS.
On Feb 1, 12:57 am, SkyGuide <skyguide.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ***BREAKING NEWS!***
> NASA ANNOUNCES TWO NEWS CONFERENCES TO DISCUSS THE 2011 BUDGET AND A > BOLD NEW APPROACH TO EXPLORATION
We carried the first two press briefings on Astronomy.FM today. There is a detailed briefing to be held at the AAAS tomorrow (Tuesday), at 10pm US Eastern time (1500 UTC); we'll carry that event live as well.
I expect that on AFM*Radio tonight (starting at 9pm Eastern / 0200 UTC) we shall begin the pissing, moaning, and general gnashing of teeth, as we discuss "NASA, whatzup?"
Quadibloc wrote: > On Jan 31, 10:57 pm, SkyGuide <skyguide.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold news conferences on Monday, Feb. 1, and > > Tuesday, Feb. 2, to discuss the fiscal year 2011 budget request and > > announce bold new developments in the nation's civil space effort.
> Despite the abandonment of the plan to return to the Moon and go to > Mars... which, although regrettable, was not totally unexpected all > along... this is not impossible. Unmanned space exploration returns a > great deal of scientific knowledge at a fraction of the cost. > Ultimately, we still need to send people into space to complete the > task, but there is simply no compelling reason to go to Mars now like > the one we had to go to the Moon.
> And, of course, there has to be some way to get American astronauts to > the ISS.
Firstly, O'bama will very likely not be in office more than one term -
Secondly, there are strong military-national defense needs the Obama plan does not take into consideration. The Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs and related Congressional Committees, have yet to weigh in on this -
Thirdly, I dont know why NASA is weighing in so early as if this is a done-deal. It is NOT a done-deal for all of the reasons cited above. NASA is not the DOD or Congress!
NASA should stop pimping ..... before the clients have even arrived!?
On Feb 1, 4:52 pm, jerry warner <jwarn...@mchsi.com> wrote:
> Firstly, O'bama will very likely not be in office more than > one term -
I suppose that's possible, if the Republicans decide they'll filibuster all legislation the country needs until they're given power back again.
I wish they could put the Republicans in charge of foreign affairs and the Democrats in charge of the economy, but unfortunately, there is no such option on the ballot. If it isn't possible to find Republicans who don't serve the wealthy, or Democrats who value the nation's security, it's time for Americans to look for a Populist party to vote for.
On Feb 1, 1:02 pm, SkyGuide <skyguide.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Today's briefing referenced several written statements.
According to Buzz Aldrin, Obama's direction lays a more solid foundation for actually getting people to Mars eventually than that of G. W. Bush.
That might even be true, but I'm not sure if the reasons are ones anyone would like.
One obvious possibility is that the Democrats will be in power for a while, so the program won't fly unless they can say it's their idea.
The other is that since Bush never really tried to fund his plan, "slow and steady wins the race" is applicable here.
Or even: the Apollo program followed Sputnik, so don't expect a serious U.S. attempt to send men to Mars until _after_ Chinese "taikonauts" walk on the Moon.
Then there's first we have to overcome the opposition to nuclear power before we can get the American economy (and maybe even Western civilization) positioned to survive long enough to support a Mars mission.
>> On Jan 31, 10:57 pm, SkyGuide <skyguide.ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold news conferences on Monday, Feb. 1, and >> > Tuesday, Feb. 2, to discuss the fiscal year 2011 budget request and >> > announce bold new developments in the nation's civil space effort.
>> Despite the abandonment of the plan to return to the Moon and go to >> Mars... which, although regrettable, was not totally unexpected all >> along... this is not impossible. Unmanned space exploration returns a >> great deal of scientific knowledge at a fraction of the cost. >> Ultimately, we still need to send people into space to complete the >> task, but there is simply no compelling reason to go to Mars now like >> the one we had to go to the Moon.
>> And, of course, there has to be some way to get American astronauts to >> the ISS.
> Firstly, O'bama will very likely not be in office more than > one term -
> Secondly, there are strong military-national defense needs > the Obama plan does not take into consideration. The > Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs and related Congressional Committees, have > yet to weigh in on this -
> Thirdly, I dont know why NASA is weighing in so early as if this is a > done-deal. It is NOT a done-deal for all of the > reasons cited above. NASA is not the DOD or Congress!
> NASA should stop pimping ..... before the clients have even arrived!?
He's doing what Clinton did, selling the U.S. out to China. It made Clinton a very rich man.