Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: rudolfensis; New fossils from Koobi Fora confirm taxonomic diversity in early Homo
51 views
Skip to first unread message
JTEM
Oct 5, 2012, 12:44:05 PM10/5/12
to
I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
mine they are never going to be. Your
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
It was a seriously dumb argument even before all the
evidence for interbreeding, but there's an even more
comical example: The Triceratops Dinosaur!
Presently, the popular belief is that what was at one
time thought of as three separate species are actually
all members of the same species -- only at different
life stages!
And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
It is undeniably true that, had all our current breeds
of dogs lived 50 million years ago instead of today,
"Scientist" would be claiming that they were all different
species... and just think of what they would have made
of our mutts!
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
mine they are never going to be. Your
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
It was a seriously dumb argument even before all the
evidence for interbreeding, but there's an even more
comical example: The Triceratops Dinosaur!
Presently, the popular belief is that what was at one
time thought of as three separate species are actually
all members of the same species -- only at different
life stages!
And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
It is undeniably true that, had all our current breeds
of dogs lived 50 million years ago instead of today,
"Scientist" would be claiming that they were all different
species... and just think of what they would have made
of our mutts!
Lee Olsen
Oct 5, 2012, 10:21:18 PM10/5/12
to
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
aren't.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sock%20puppet
sock puppet
1: A fake personality, usually a 'friend' or 'sister,' created by a
drama queen/king for the sake of defending him/herself against others
in an online forum.
2: Someone who might be an actual person but behaves like the above,
defending someone who really deserves no defense.
Nope, not one word about multiple I.P. addresses.
The real issue, you keep avoiding, is you are a convicted sock puppet
by your own admission.
Confession 1
JTEM 12 Dec 2007 04:18 GMT
"I've also posted many, many, many other "fake" articles in
other groups, which few people didn't recognize as parody.
Yes, even when posted under a different name people had
no problems seeing that they were parodies."
Confession 2
From: Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
>I need only crank the organ and the monkey will dance!
Mar 24, 5:23 pm
Lee Olsen wrote:
> > Cranking your organ is the only job you ever had.
JTEM replies with this classic:
On Mar 25, 5:03 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you a sick fuck because you sexualize everything
> I say, or do you sexualize everything I say because
> you're a sick fuck?
"I"? You are so stupid you forgot which pseud you were using.
http://tinyurl.com/39hlw25
"Ooooh, lookee here! Turns out JTEM has been accusing anyone and
everyone, for years now, of being sock puppets. What is it with JTEM
and sock puppets? Does JTEM harbour a sock-puppet fetish? Is he in an
illicit relationship with a muppet? Perhaps he was caught cheating on
Mrs Piggy, in bed with Lamb Chop. Clearly, his interest has nothing to
do with the Internet usage of the word, no matter how much he might
claim otherwise. He makes the accusations wildly, without any
rationale behind them, so clearly he does not actually believe the
Internet usage even applies.
So, given that he can only be thinking of physical sock puppets, we
can see JTEM is a very, very sick person indeed."
>One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
>interbreeding was that they were two different species,
>and different species can't interbreed...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/05/2/l_052_02.html
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 5, 9:44 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
> much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
> mine they are never going to be.
Moron, no one said they were and nobody cares if they are or they
> I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
> much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
> mine they are never going to be.
aren't.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sock%20puppet
sock puppet
1: A fake personality, usually a 'friend' or 'sister,' created by a
drama queen/king for the sake of defending him/herself against others
in an online forum.
2: Someone who might be an actual person but behaves like the above,
defending someone who really deserves no defense.
Nope, not one word about multiple I.P. addresses.
The real issue, you keep avoiding, is you are a convicted sock puppet
by your own admission.
Confession 1
JTEM 12 Dec 2007 04:18 GMT
"I've also posted many, many, many other "fake" articles in
other groups, which few people didn't recognize as parody.
Yes, even when posted under a different name people had
no problems seeing that they were parodies."
Confession 2
From: Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
>I need only crank the organ and the monkey will dance!
Mar 24, 5:23 pm
Lee Olsen wrote:
> > Cranking your organ is the only job you ever had.
JTEM replies with this classic:
On Mar 25, 5:03 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you a sick fuck because you sexualize everything
> I say, or do you sexualize everything I say because
> you're a sick fuck?
"I"? You are so stupid you forgot which pseud you were using.
http://tinyurl.com/39hlw25
"Ooooh, lookee here! Turns out JTEM has been accusing anyone and
everyone, for years now, of being sock puppets. What is it with JTEM
and sock puppets? Does JTEM harbour a sock-puppet fetish? Is he in an
illicit relationship with a muppet? Perhaps he was caught cheating on
Mrs Piggy, in bed with Lamb Chop. Clearly, his interest has nothing to
do with the Internet usage of the word, no matter how much he might
claim otherwise. He makes the accusations wildly, without any
rationale behind them, so clearly he does not actually believe the
Internet usage even applies.
So, given that he can only be thinking of physical sock puppets, we
can see JTEM is a very, very sick person indeed."
>One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
>interbreeding was that they were two different species,
>and different species can't interbreed...
JTEM
Oct 6, 2012, 1:15:39 AM10/6/12
to
I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
mine they are never going to be. Your
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
Lee Olsen
Oct 6, 2012, 10:22:51 AM10/6/12
to
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 5, 10:15 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
>And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
Message-ID: <87ocvgs2...@nospam.pacbell.net>
>And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009
"JTEM is repeating a number of his lies, hoping some will
stick including
1. lies about my identity (Bill Taylor is someone
else.)
(and, depending on the post)
2. lies about what I posted.
3. lies about what a discussion is about.
The extent to which he is lying is strong evidence that
he is in fact a pathlogical liar. He has reduced himself
to figuratively getting into bed with Bill Taylor, one of
the most rabid homophobes plaguing this/these newsgroups
while pretending to be just the opposite.
And he's been complaining that I'm giving him a default
response when he posts the same lies over and over in spite
of the obvious fact that he is posting his garbage merely
as harassment (and possibly as an indication that he suffers
from Tourette syndrome given the language he often uses).
Until he has something substantial to contribute and can
express himself civilly, this idiot will get this canned
reply."
JTEM
Oct 7, 2012, 1:31:26 AM10/7/12
to
I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
mine they are never going to be. Your
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
It was a seriously dumb argument even before all the
evidence for interbreeding, but there's an even more
comical example: The Triceratops Dinosaur!
Presently, the popular belief is that what was at one
time thought of as three separate species are actually
all members of the same species -- only at different
life stages!
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
mine they are never going to be. Your
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
It was a seriously dumb argument even before all the
evidence for interbreeding, but there's an even more
comical example: The Triceratops Dinosaur!
Presently, the popular belief is that what was at one
time thought of as three separate species are actually
all members of the same species -- only at different
life stages!
And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
Lee Olsen
Oct 7, 2012, 9:30:55 AM10/7/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 6, 10:31 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
> Now, I repeat
Repeating your stupidity isn't going to make it come true.
JTEM
Oct 8, 2012, 3:06:33 PM10/8/12
to
Lee Olsen
Oct 8, 2012, 3:45:01 PM10/8/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
JTEM
Oct 11, 2012, 4:33:51 AM10/11/12
to
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139
> "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME CITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139
> "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME CITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
Lee Olsen
Oct 11, 2012, 8:34:08 AM10/11/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Oct 11, 1:33 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out
> Sick fuck
What's the matter, are you too stupid to understand a shell midden
isn't a boat?
> Check this out
> Sick fuck
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
Still no evidence for 13 kya boats.
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
What's the matter, are you too stupid to understand a shell midden
isn't a boat?
C. Jackson Rogers
Oct 11, 2012, 8:06:41 PM10/11/12
to
Jtem wasn't kidding. The rich/mike/lee retard really
did cherry pick a quote from a cite, a quote that the
cite itself refutes!
And Jtem really did point this out and retard really did
post the exact same refuted quote in response.
Disgusting.
did cherry pick a quote from a cite, a quote that the
cite itself refutes!
And Jtem really did point this out and retard really did
post the exact same refuted quote in response.
Disgusting.
Lee Olsen
Oct 11, 2012, 8:49:15 PM10/11/12
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
JTEM
Oct 15, 2012, 12:53:17 AM10/15/12
to
Lee Olsen
Oct 15, 2012, 11:25:26 AM10/15/12
to
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
>And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
Yes, and you have tried to deceive people using multiple names many
times also.
http://tinyurl.com/2bclbfy
JTEM
Oct 24, 2012, 12:10:23 AM10/24/12
to
Lee Olsen
Oct 24, 2012, 12:56:48 AM10/24/12
to
On Oct 23, 9:10 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sick fuck
JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Message-ID: <9d955fbd-9672-4d43-a554-
f45c5d...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
"The point is that the remains do not match those of the supposed
Beringer
population."
Archaeologists
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat
"only" by boat? So he's making a false claim and only illiterate sock
puppets would believe such tripe:
http://sanjuancapistrano.patch.com/articles/teen-sets-record-in-swim-from-channel-islands-to-mainland
"Fiona Goh, 13, swims more than 12 miles in about 10 hours. She's the
youngest to complete a swim from one of the Channel Islands."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/21/us-cuba-swim-idUSBRE87K0J120120821
"Nyad's latest swim followed that of Penny Palfrey, a British-born 49-
year-old grandmother from Australia, who tried the Cuba-Florida
crossing in late June and swam 93 miles before the Gulf Stream forced
her to stop.
Palfrey holds the record for the longest unassisted swim, 67.5 miles
in the Cayman Islands last summer."
And let's not forget that at the end of the Pleistocene the distance
to Santa Rosae was only about a third of what it is today.
> Sick fuck
JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
Message-ID: <9d955fbd-9672-4d43-a554-
f45c5d...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
"The point is that the remains do not match those of the supposed
Beringer
population."
Archaeologists
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat
puppets would believe such tripe:
http://sanjuancapistrano.patch.com/articles/teen-sets-record-in-swim-from-channel-islands-to-mainland
"Fiona Goh, 13, swims more than 12 miles in about 10 hours. She's the
youngest to complete a swim from one of the Channel Islands."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/21/us-cuba-swim-idUSBRE87K0J120120821
"Nyad's latest swim followed that of Penny Palfrey, a British-born 49-
year-old grandmother from Australia, who tried the Cuba-Florida
crossing in late June and swam 93 miles before the Gulf Stream forced
her to stop.
Palfrey holds the record for the longest unassisted swim, 67.5 miles
in the Cayman Islands last summer."
And let's not forget that at the end of the Pleistocene the distance
to Santa Rosae was only about a third of what it is today.
JTEM
Oct 29, 2012, 5:54:52 AM10/29/12
to
Lee Olsen
Oct 29, 2012, 7:13:21 PM10/29/12
to
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
wrote:
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
> : Maritime people did have boats off the North American
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago
> : Archaeologists
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
Too bad some idiots still think shell middens are boats and people
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
can't swim.
http://sanjuancapistrano.patch.com/articles/teen-sets-record-in-swim-from-channel-islands-to-mainland
"Fiona Goh, 13, swims more than 12 miles in about 10 hours. She's the
youngest to complete a swim from one of the Channel Islands."
Not to mention the islands were only about a third the distance from
"Fiona Goh, 13, swims more than 12 miles in about 10 hours. She's the
youngest to complete a swim from one of the Channel Islands."
the mainland at the end of the Pleistocene as they are today.
http://tinyurl.com/8nrkvbl
JTEM
Oct 30, 2012, 2:43:08 AM10/30/12
to
Lee Olsen
Oct 30, 2012, 2:56:41 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 29, 11:43 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sick fuck
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
wrote:
> Sick fuck
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
wrote:
> : Maritime people did have boats off the North American
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago
> : Archaeologists
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
JTEM
Oct 30, 2012, 6:34:00 AM10/30/12
to
If you don't know a thing about anthropology
but insist on posting anyways, you end up
making a fool out of yourself. Take a look:
but insist on posting anyways, you end up
making a fool out of yourself. Take a look:
Lee Olsen
Oct 30, 2012, 11:41:03 AM10/30/12
to
On Oct 30, 3:34 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sick fuck
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
> wrote:
> Sick fuck
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
> wrote:
> : Maritime people did have boats off the North American
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago
Oh really, just exactly where are they hiding all this imaginary boat
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago
evidence?
> : Archaeologists
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
0 new messages