Message from discussion
rudolfensis; New fossils from Koobi Fora confirm taxonomic diversity in early Homo
Received: by 10.66.78.40 with SMTP id y8mr2521473paw.2.1349490078676;
Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.212.99 with SMTP id nj3mr3645776pbc.20.1349490078661; Fri,
05 Oct 2012 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Path: g9ni23679pbh.1!nntp.google.com!kr7no6349156pbb.0!postnews.google.com!i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Followup-To: sci.anthropology, alt.history
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=97.119.240.245; posting-account=qDV0SwkAAAA_Kw-D3zmf7uXtBWQ6Ctyx
NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.119.240.245
References: <502838C6.4862E502@hotmail.com> <bc5ea0dc-858e-4c0e-8328-04e87ddaa084@vt2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<1f53b149-8dcd-43a9-8121-179024e04f52@j14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
<c2eb6dbf-90b2-4aaf-b361-bb1040738bcc@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
<c59055fc-8108-49a3-b302-e83b85ed815d@e14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
<641ca8b9-7757-47b6-98a1-8ccf1a447c9d@lo4g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <ab35836e-e164-45cc-8e01-e0dd04ff5bd8@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/5.0),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <f79a5273-92f4-419d-98c8-c167c55b21f8@i7g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: rudolfensis; New fossils from Koobi Fora confirm taxonomic
diversity in early Homo
From: Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 02:21:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 5, 9:44=A0am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
> much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
> mine they are never going to be.
Moron, no one said they were and nobody cares if they are or they
aren't.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=3Dsock%20puppet
sock puppet
1: A fake personality, usually a 'friend' or 'sister,' created by a
drama queen/king for the sake of defending him/herself against others
in an online forum.
2: Someone who might be an actual person but behaves like the above,
defending someone who really deserves no defense.
Nope, not one word about multiple I.P. addresses.
The real issue, you keep avoiding, is you are a convicted sock puppet
by your own admission.
Confession 1
JTEM 12 Dec 2007 04:18 GMT
"I've also posted many, many, many other "fake" articles in
other groups, which few people didn't recognize as parody.
Yes, even when posted under a different name people had
no problems seeing that they were parodies."
Confession 2
From: Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
>I need only crank the organ and the monkey will dance!
Mar 24, 5:23 pm
Lee Olsen wrote:
> > Cranking your organ is the only job you ever had.
JTEM replies with this classic:
On Mar 25, 5:03 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you a sick fuck because you sexualize everything
> I say, or do you sexualize everything I say because
> you're a sick fuck?
"I"? You are so stupid you forgot which pseud you were using.
http://tinyurl.com/39hlw25
"Ooooh, lookee here! Turns out JTEM has been accusing anyone and
everyone, for years now, of being sock puppets. What is it with JTEM
and sock puppets? Does JTEM harbour a sock-puppet fetish? Is he in an
illicit relationship with a muppet? Perhaps he was caught cheating on
Mrs Piggy, in bed with Lamb Chop. Clearly, his interest has nothing to
do with the Internet usage of the word, no matter how much he might
claim otherwise. He makes the accusations wildly, without any
rationale behind them, so clearly he does not actually believe the
Internet usage even applies.
So, given that he can only be thinking of physical sock puppets, we
can see JTEM is a very, very sick person indeed."
>One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
>interbreeding was that they were two different species,
>and different species can't interbreed...
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/05/2/l_052_02.html