'Sacks' In Any Religion - {HRI 20060521-UAA} (Version UAA - proper for, and thus adapted to reach Under Age Americans, etc.)
Koos Nolst Trenite
21 May 2006
{HRI 20060521-UAA}
(Version UAA for
Under Age Americans)
'
Men and women are souls, spiritual beings, and all their feeling and
their thinking and their looking and their communicating and their
emotions, are entirely spiritual in nature (which is also called
spiritual Energy).
By DENYING the continuous, spiritual (or spiritual Energy) exchange
between men and women, that takes place all the time, you are then
degrading men and women
as if they are like animals, or worse. Which is a degradation
that in any religion is opposed.
'
There is, there exists, there is taking place, everywhere,
and entirely regardless of whether the body is dressed and
covered, or not,
there is a constant 'sacksuwal' Energy exchange between men and women
(and boys and girls, and girls and men, and boys and women).
'
And this continues to takes place also when they do not see each
other, as you know very well to be the case:
Love, or your liking for another, is not stopped by walls; Love,
or your liking for another, knows no distance, and neither does
'sacksuwal' Energy.
And the same applies, of course, to someone who Loves you, or who
has a liking for you - spiritual Energy knows no distance, no
walls, and so it is with 'sacksuwal' Energy too.
Again, whether you are taught "that you are not a
spiritual being, that you are not a soul," does not make
any difference at all as regards the fact of your
spiritual activity - truth is absolute.
'
It does not wait, and it does not ask whether someone is married, and
it does not ask for someone's age, but it radiates, it emanates, it
is a natural component of Love, of Love for Life, of Love for people,
as long as someone's soul is alive, as long as your soul is alive.
Now whether that ALSO results in an activity of physically
joining bodies, THAT is an entirely different matter,
and that primarily is guided by the amount of Truth, of
Love and Beauty that would be contained in and resulting
from such a union of bodies,
which you may also want to translate as 'absence of
Lies,' 'absence of Hate,' and 'absence of Ugliness.'
*(1)
'
Again: When you DENY the continuous, 'sacksuwal,' spiritual
Energy exchange that does take place between men and women all
the time, when you DENY the spiritual activity of 'sacks,' then
you degrade men and women into being animals.
'
Thus any ban on contact between men and women, does oppose, does deny
and does destroy the active, existing, real and true spiritual nature
of man,
and so, that of course destroys ANY religion
- and indeed has destroyed or severely damaged any religion
at times in the past, and has been A MEANS of destroying
religions in the past.
'
To regard and define "'sacks'" as 'a physical (bodily) contact between
people'
- as has been done at various times in history by various
Criminally Minded "religious leaders," and which was - of
course not voiced as being such, but which was - done entirely
with the purpose to DESTROY the religion they were part of -
because to make people regard and define "'sacks'" as being
'a physical(bodily) contact between people'
is degrading people into regarding and treating people as if they "are
animals," or worse.
'
And indeed, THEN - in order to agree and comply with such doctrines
about "'sacks'" - many start to behave like animals, and indeed THEN
many start to treat the opposite 'sacks,' as if these "are animals."
But that is exactly what you try to prevent.
And such a "definition" and resulting practice of "'sacks'," is
indeed wholly opposed to the purpose and activity of ANY
religion.
'
Now we have cleared the main subject, and then we can again look at
the details that life provides, also regarding existing 'sacksuwal'
activities:
As in any activity, so also in 'sacksuwal' activities, Religion
may have - and in my opinion should have - legitimate objections
against Hatred, against Ugliness and against Lies, *(1)
which are injected by Criminal Minds *(2) indeed into any
activity of Life, and so
of course also in 'sacksuwal' activities and 'sacksuwal'
communications. *(a)
Criminal Minds can get very Ugly, extremely Hateful, and
utterly Deceptive, also in their 'sacksuwal' "activities."
'
Some have tried to "remedy" for instance the acts of Criminal Minds of
greed and theft, BY NOT HAVING THINGS "that could be the object
of anyone else's evil," of anyone's desire to steal or to vandalize.
This was proclaimed in Communism, to abolish ownership, in
order "to remedy Crime and Criminals"
- while in fact, Communism was designed to ENABLE Criminal
Minds to take all your possessions away and to prevent your
responsibility for life and for people, and to dominate you,
an activity which is of course denying and opposing the
very nature of life itself.
'
But agreeing with such "remedies," is doing exactly what Criminal
Minds want of you:
They try to get you to somehow destroy life - in any way that they
can trick and force you to do so.
'
Thus to "wait with 'sacks'" till you are married
- while the natural truth is, that men and women, boys and
girls, do have 'sacksuwal' feelings for each other
continuously,
which is not waiting at all, and which is felt
continuously by the opposite 'sacks' too, and
which you feel towards many and which many feel towards
you,
as it is the nature of men and women to like people,
which automatically generates 'sacksuwal' spiritual
Energy as well,
so you are NOT AT ALL in actual fact "waiting with 'sacks' till
you are married," nor are you, in actual fact, "waiting with
'sacks' till you have found the very true one, and waiting
still then till after the wedding,"
thus such "waiting with 'sacks'" -
must be an idiotic a lie which has no basis in factual life,
UNLESS you define "'sacks'" as the 'physical joining of bodies,'
suggesting and implying and enforcing in many aspects the
atrocious lie, that "you are a physical object," "a body,"
"ONLY WHAT YOUR BODY DOES, is done by you," enforcing,
that "you are not of spiritual nature," which is an idiotic lie,
and which leads
to define the FEELINGS - the spiritual Energy - as "not 'sacks'," but
to define the physical touching (which may be without feeling, and in
many cases is indeed without or with very little feeling) as "being
the 'sacks'."
'
When you (being a girl or woman, or a boy or man, respectively,
and of normal, healthy 'sacksuwal' disposition) when you think
of a Beautiful, Loving man or woman, you NATURALLY create and
flow 'sacksuwal' Energy towards him or her!
And vice-versa, this occurs from him or her to you as well.
'
To DENY that, IS DENYING your own spiritual nature, and IS
DENYING the spiritual nature of others, and IS DENYING the
spiritual nature of your own body and the spiritual nature of
someone else's body. *(3)
'
'
'Sacksuwal' activity is thus entirely a spiritual matter, and without
it
- if you still would call it ''sacks'' when it is in fact not
more of an activity, than moving your legs would be -
"'sacks'" is then a mechanical activity which has nothing to do with
the nature of people,
not with your nature, nor with the nature of someone you love,
of the opposite 'sacks,' *(4)
then "'sacks'" is - at best - a degrading, soul-less activity.
'
Such a degrading, soul-less view of life, is opposed to ANY religion,
and so, if the continuous creation and existence of 'sacks' as an
entirely spiritual activity, which takes place continuously,
IS DENIED in any religion, then it is destroying itself, and is
destroying any other religion as well. *(5)
'
Koos Nolst Trenite "Cause Trinity"
human rights philosopher and poet
'Men of all nations came
to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
sent by all the kings of the world,
who had heard of his wisdom.'
1 Kings 4:34
_________
Footnotes:
(1) 'The Trinity Of Science - Truth, Love and Beauty'
{HRI 20030307-pi-1-V2.1} (7 Mar 2003 - Ver. 2.1 on 17 Oct 2003)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/4129fa4f1a67840e?fwc=1
(2) 'Rights of Criminal Minds' {HRI 20040108-V1.0.1}
(8 January 2004 - Version 1.0.1 on 12 Nov 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/2d74f7c389973d14?fwc=1
(3) 'Plato On Making Love - And Defining Loneliness'
{HRI 20041114-V2.0.2}
(14 November 2004 - Version 2.0.2 on 29 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/a8326be589085802?fwc=1
{HRI 20041114-V2.0-UAA}
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/ebdd8f227dd037e2?fwc=1
(4) 'About 'Sacksuwal' Orientation' {HRI 20050619} (19 June 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology/msg/8b802829a1da95d8?fwc=1
(5) 'Religious Freedom - (Definition for Human Rights enforcement)'
{HRI 20030407-3-V1.0} (7 April 2003 - Issue 3)
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.europe/msg/eae554cbb7bed58?fwc=1
(6) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Introduction: Life Forms'
(p1) {HRI 20010829-pi1-V1.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 1 Version 1.1 on 8 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/ca03e63aa71603eb?fwc=1
(p2) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Introduction: Our Planet'
{HRI 20010829-pi2-V1.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 2 Version 1.1 on 9 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/660053d9538d4c54?fwc=1
(p3) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - The Denial'
{HRI 20010829-pi3-V1.1}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 3 Version 1.1 on 10 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/2529732655e60747?fwc=1
(p4) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- Some Fine Particle Physics' {HRI 20010829-pi4-V2.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 4 Version 2.0 on 11 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/a5c1ca01fa700c16?fwc=1
(p5) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- The Nature Of The Physical Universe' {HRI 20010829-pi5-V1.2}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 5 Version 1.2 on 12 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/8d4e1bb6424a73f5?fwc=1
(p6) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- Opposing The Nature Of The Creation' {HRI 20010829-pi6-V2.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 6 Version 2.0 on 15 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/70dd57d6d11d5d5f?fwc=1
(p7) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth
- Life Energy Particles And Your Body' {HRI 20010829-pi7-V2.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 7 Version 2.0 on 16 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/b030e02be2ba104a?fwc=1
(p8) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles
- Perception And Motion' {HRI 20010829-pi8-V1.2}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 8 Version 1.2 on 18 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/48c04344037dac6d?fwc=1
(p9) 'The Nature Of Life As Seen From Earth - Life Energy Particles
- Perception At A Distance' {HRI 20010829-pi9-V2.0}
(29 August 2001 - part issue 9 Version 2.0 on 21 Aug 2005)
http://groups.google.com/group/Fine-Particle-Physics/msg/3c571f55d616c2c2?fwc=1
'
________
Textnote:
*(a) In some Islamic cultures, the girls and women are told to cover
their hair, even their whole body, "because they have to stop
or to not invite 'the bestial desires of men,' they have to
dominate the 'sacksuwal' behavior of men towards women."
Some might give you other "reasons" which are, however,
merely to hide that actual intention: a destructive
intention, which is - as you will see at some time -
actually 'to please Criminal Minds' by assuming or
practicing very false views about people.
'
Now, I happen to be a man, and - like the vast majority of men -
I do not at all have any 'bestial desires that should be curbed'
by anyone, also not by women.
So, to most men, it is just a straightforward insult, to be
shown by a woman, that 'she has to control his bestial desires.'
The faithful reader understands, that I am talking about
absolute truth - which means, regardless of whether
something is voiced, or understood, or even known - that
what is going on, IS going on, is absolute truth.
(I have explained this elsewhere very thoroughly, and
easily understandable for you.)
'
On top of that, the girls and women are taught, either directly
or by implying it, the ATROCIOUS LIE, that "most men are evil"
and that "men's bestial desires must be controlled by women,"
that men must be dominated by the manner in which women dress -
in this case, by covering anything
"that could remind men of 'sacks' - yes, even of the
Beauty of women - which would again unleash his bestial
desires..."
'
That is a straightforward denial of the spiritual nature of life:
YOU FEEL people, because you are a spirit, a soul, and
because others are a spirit, a soul - and this has nothing
to do at all with the clothing unless you are in a culture
where 'sacks' (the spiritual Energy of 'sacks') is heavily
denied to exist,
where the senses are supposed to be those of the
body only, without feeling or seeing the soul of
another - which means without Love, without
Understanding, without Responsibility or Care for
another. *(3)
'
A normal man or boy FEELS how women or girls feel, and equally,
a normal woman or girl FEELS how men or boys feel - and that has
nothing at all to do, with whether they are dressed or not, or
whether they are in another room, or whether they are married or
not:
You still FEEL them, simply by the fact of your being alive, and
the fact of their being alive; spiritual Energy also knows no
distance, and no walls.
But DENYING that, is the behavior of animals - and even animals
are usually not that stupid - to refuse to know, that they are
entirely spiritual in nature, and
you would also be refusing to act according to your own nature,
which IS entirely spiritual:
People are souls, and they feel and think as souls, which
IS spiritually, of course.
'
By DENYING that, then normal men, of decent nature, are indeed
led to behave like animals, also towards women:
They may develop customs of locking their wives up in their
houses, and to forbid women to take part in social life,
and they prevent women from showing their Beauty in public.
Which is then - if you like - the automatic and historic
'retaliation' of enforcing in turn on women the ugly lie, the
very destructive lie, that "women must be dominated" - "else they
will seduce men."
If you trace these customs back in history, you will find some
Criminal Minds, who intended to destroy the religion they were
part of. *(6)
____________
Verification:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
Copyright 2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it, and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)