there is a clear progression of evolutionary changes in arm and leg bones from Orrorin to Lucy to Turkana boy #148 Stonethrowing theory central to anthropology
Archimedes Plutonium
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_afarensis
In this picture of Lucy the femur looks larger than the humerus so the
throwing of Lucy and Australopithecus appears to be more dominant than
the bipedalism.
And both the throwing and the bipedalism is Lucy looks
like a vast improvement over that of Orrorin some 6
million years ago (Lucy was 3.2 million years ago).
The lower arm of Lucy looks larger than the upper arm.
So the evidence, when we ignore brain size, appears to fit all nice
and neatly with a comprehensive Stonethrowing theory
So if we take all the hominid fossils of their arm and leg bones and
listed them as per how old they are:
6 million year
5 million year
4 million year
3 million year
2 million year
and then correlate their elbow, knee, hip as midpoints they all fit in
well as progressively approaching the bone anatomy of humanity as per
arm and legs.
In old-anthropology, they listed only the brain size
and then were stuck with inconsistencies and not
a progression.
It is the brain size that had flatlined and misled the anthropology
community. And the probable cause of a flatlining of brain size was
Inbreeding, but the Throwing and increased throwing was a straightline
increasing evolution that would end up as our species.
So in old-anthropology analysis where brain size was
the only item looked at that underpinned their lists, inconsistencies
arose where Australopithecus was questioned as being our direct
ancestors and even
more paradoxes with Hobbit man. But if we charted
and listed all anthropology fossil finds as per length
of arm and leg bones per Throwing, then there are no
more inconsistencies and paradoxes. They all fit
nicely as a straightline evolution. Where Orrorin can be
said to be 50% of a Human overarm thrower
and Australopithecus is 60% Human overarm thrower
and Homo habilis and erectus about 75% Human
overarm thrower.
So once we set this guage of measurement of
arm and leg bone length with elbow, knee, hip as
midpoints then all is well fitting.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Lee Olsen
<plutonium.archime...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If one looks at this picture of Lucy in Wikipedia:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus_afarensis
>
> In this picture of Lucy the femur looks larger than the humerus so the
> throwing of Lucy and Australopithecus appears to be more dominant than
> the bipedalism.
ROFL
> And both the throwing and the bipedalism is Lucy looks
> like a vast improvement over that of Orrorin some 6
> million years ago (Lucy was 3.2 million years ago).
No manuports, no evidence, no hypothesis.
>
> The lower arm of Lucy looks larger than the upper arm.
Now there's real science at work. Just guess.
>
> So the evidence, when we ignore brain size, appears to fit all nice
> and neatly with a comprehensive Stonethrowing theory
You mean it fits your imagination.
FYI:
"Two indepandent lines of research converged on the
conclusion that early Homo was an efficient runner, the first human
species to be so Leakey (1994:55)."