new theory, volume of space linked to health
Archimedes Plutonium
Nick Ferrala <nfer...@binax-nel.com> writes:
> Interesting, Mr. Plutonium, but really 2 completely different principles at
> work here. The first one, of confining or artificial space, is clearly
Well, thanks but this new theory of mine has many gaps in it at the
moment, but I rather post it roughly and later refine it to remove the
gaps. For instance I need to clarify the zoo-keeper gap. But most
important of all of this is the theoretical notion that volume-of-space
is intimately connected to DNA. And to be able to say, given a volume
of space with certain features, then, one can predict what DNA is *in
harmony* with that volume-of-space.
This volume-of-space and DNA in harmony is a reverse order of Darwin
evolution. It is flipping around by 180 degrees of Darwin evolution.
For example, given a volume-of-space of 1 meter x 1 meter x 1 meter
that is full of water and at constant temperature 25C. (Which is
commonly known as a fish tank) That this volume of space is destined in
1999 to have fungus/bacteria/mold rule this space, the moment added
energy is stopped.
Given another volume-of-space that is the oceans of Earth. That this
volume of space is destined to have some plant life rule this volume of
space and all other forms of DNA are temporary and will perish in these
oceans.
What I am attempting to do is to link volume-of-space (with certain
physical conditions), to that of the actual DNA/RNA structure. That
some structure of fungus DNA is the most harmonious structure for a
particular volume-of-space and needs no added energy.
And, whereas some zoo animals in fact live longer in a zoo than if
they were in the wilds where no imposed boundaries such as the glass
walls of a fish tank or fencing of the animals, however, the zoo
animals need constant attention and so this added energy by the
caretakers of the zoo, it is this added energy that keeps the zoo
animals living longer than if in the wilds. Same with the fish tank for
we supply energy to the system to keep the fish alive, but if this
added energy were stopped then the fish would quickly die and that
volume-of-space would revert quickly to a form of DNA which has a DNA
structure that is the most harmonic tune with that volume of space and
take over.
So, what I am proposing is that we get the genomes of many species
and we get the volumes-of-space where those genomes flourish and we
thus link the specific genome structure to that volume-of-space.
In the distant future, some scientific archive will have huge
tabulations of the genomes of many species and also have tabulations of
volumes-of-space, and links to special sites on that genome showing
that those sites are what makes for fungus the ruling DNA for fish
tanks under certain conditions.
By doing this research work, we link physical space, physics, to DNA,
biology. It is as if each volume of space has only certain DNA that is
harmonic to it and that other DNA is out of tune and will be only
transitory in that volume of space.
It is not a formula of equality, ie an equation, but a chemical
process. A chemical reaction. Volumes-of-Space connected to DNA are
chemical reactions.
Give someone a volume of space, say 1 cubic centimeter or 1 cubic
meter, or
1 billion cubic meters and give some physical conditions to this volume
of space such as temperature, density, how much water etc. Then,
suppose we had a complete list of every organisms genome, then, from
that list we should be able to match a genome that will rule that
volume of space. Other DNA genomes may live in the volume of space only
temporarily before going extinct within that volume of space.
Obviously the human genome would never rule a volume of space that is
1 cubic centimeter simply because no human could fit into a cubic
centimeter. But there exists a DNA genome that is superior to all other
DNA genomes for one cubic centimeter of space under certain physical
conditions. Perhaps a bacteria or virus DNA/RNA is most harmonic to 1
cubic centimeter of specific conditions.
A fish tank will allow fish to live in it only because humans provide
the energy for the fish to survive, but the moment this energy is
stopped, then, there exists a DNA genome for which that specific fish
tank is in greatest harmony and will revert to.
The most important aspect I am trying to unravel in this new theory
is to link volume-of-space (physics parameter) to that of the structure
of DNA genomes (biology parameter). And if this theory is correct,
whether in partial or in whole, would mean that we can look at a
specific genome of say a rat or liverwort or whale or donkey or elm,
examine its genome and be able to point at a structure of that genome
and from this structure compute its corresponding Volume of Space with
Physical Conditions.
This new theory implies that each DNA genome has a volume of space
that is in harmony with the genome, and if it is out of harmony means
that the species is only temporary to that volume of space and will
eventually perish from it and be succeeded by another species whose
genome is more in harmony with that volume of space.
I am saying that if we could fully list every species genome, that
each has a Volume of Space where it is in maximum harmony. And we can
pinpoint certain strings of the genome, say of fish and of fungus, and
point to the string on the fish that proves that the fish will die in a
Volume of Space that is a fish tank, and point to a string on the
fungus genome that proves that this string is in maximum harmony with
the volume of space that is a fish tank.
What keeps the fish alive in the fish tank and the zoo animals
lifespan longer than its wild counterpart is the fact that _added
energy_ is constantly supplied to these volumes of space. The instant
the added energy stops, then the DNA that is in harmony with that
volume of space begins to take over.
The thought just occurred to me that if I can link volume of space
to genomes, then, some tests are readily available. Consider that the
human genome is different from the ape or monkey genome, but not by
much difference. But this difference would make for a difference in
Volume of Space from that of apes and monkeys and humans. Thus, the
difference in DNA structure of ape from human requires that ape Volume
of Space be so much less than human Volume of Space. Call these
structural DNA entities the volume-of-space-genes. Should this be true,
then we may have a new tool for anthropology dating.
Nick Ferrala
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> In article <3733044B...@binax-nel.com>
> Nick Ferrala <nfer...@binax-nel.com> writes:
>
> > Interesting, Mr. Plutonium, but really 2 completely different principles at
> > work here. The first one, of confining or artificial space, is clearly
>
> Well, thanks but this new theory of mine has many gaps in it at the
> moment, but I rather post it roughly and later refine it to remove the
> gaps. For instance I need to clarify the zoo-keeper gap. But most
> important of all of this is the theoretical notion that volume-of-space
> is intimately connected to DNA. And to be able to say, given a volume
> of space with certain features, then, one can predict what DNA is *in
> harmony* with that volume-of-space.
>
>
What you are saying makes no sense, man, as volume of space is irrelevant. Will
there be a different fungus in a 10 gallon fish tank vs. a 100 gallon fish tank?
Yes, if the prevailing conditions are different, such as temperature gradient,
light penetration, number of fish producing waste products, amount of food added
to feed the fish (and hence amount of excess or wasted food in the system), etc.
Do we tend to see a different fungus in these 2 tanks? Probably, because it is
unlikely that the conditions will be identical in these two vastly different
environments. However, if the conditions were identical, then it would support
an identical community of organisms, irregardless of the volume of water.
DNA and organismal genomes will correlate with the conditions within the
environment - i.e., organisms are best suited for particular environments based
upon their DNA in as much as their DNA determines their overall functional
capabilities (temperature regulation, metabolic capabilities, instinct, etc.).
Volume of space is irrelevant other than given 2 identical processes (such as the
decay of a 10 gram fish) in different volume tanks, these processes may vary if
the volume were significantly different among the 2 tanks. For example,
nutrient, waste, bacterial levels and other parameters will vary if that
degradation occurs in a 10 vs a 100 gallon tank due to some of the factors listed
above as well as simple dilution. The variations in these parameters will affect
the individual environments and dictate which organisms (and hence genomes) are
best suited to take hold and grow in each tank.
Why are there vastly differing communities in a puddle vs. a lake? Not at all
because of volume, but because these are 2 incredibly different environments, and
the organisms that are successful in each environment are the ones that have the
best abilities, as dictated through their genetic makeup, to utilize the
resources in each environment and whoes life-sustaining processes (e.g.
temperature regulation) are operating within required ranges (also determined
genetically) and that these ranges are consistent with the particular
environmet. These interrelationships are very complex, and the only factor
volume plays is that it affects some of these factors. However, is will never be
consistent and will never correlate with genetics in any sort of consistent
manner. What you are saying is consistent with this in many ways, but you must
look into it much deeper and understand the complex processes that are occuring
in these environments.
But remember... you definitely get an A+ for abstract yet logical thinking!
Archimedes Plutonium
Nick Ferrala <nfer...@binax-nel.com> writes:
> What you are saying makes no sense, man, as volume of space is irrelevant.
To the contrary, it makes alot of sense. Each DNA is coded for a size
of that individual organism. Thus the DNA of a human cannot be born in
a fish bowl nor a cell, but the DNA of a fungus is coded to be born in
a fish bowl and the DNA of a bacteria is coded to be born inside a
volume of space that is a cell.
So, quite evidently DNA has coding for Volume-of-Space. So, from the
very beginning of an individual DNA life, its birth, it has a coded
relationship of either _in harmony_ with its volume of space or
_disharmony_ with its volume of space.
This is sort of analogous to Mathematical Induction, show true for the
case of 1. But the analogy breaks down.
Anyway. We have this new theory of Volume of Space linked to DNA for
the case of birth. And we can get quantitative data and we can analyze
the Genome of DNA that dictates volume of the species organism
Now comes the difficult part, to analyze the volume of space
necessary and sufficient for various DNA as they grow. Not only the
individual but all the members of a species. So, it is
species-volume-of-space that we need to analyze also.
Consider what the history of humanity had been if there never existed
a New World. Better yet, consider the history of humanity if the Earth
were one continent only and the rest was ocean. Say Africa only or
Australia only. With such a Thought-Experiment we can easily see that
Volume of Space and the characteristics of that space are very
important and correlates to the Progression of Life. I say with ease,
that if the geologic history of Earth had been one continent only and
the rest ocean, that humanity would not be here and that humanity would
have to wait for some future time before our species was manufactured.
The important science I want to get out of this is to correlate
Physical Space to DNA genome. This new theory is a reversal of the
ideas of Darwin Evolution in that Physics, the environment makes and
shapes biological entities. In this new theory I claim that
Physics/environment and biological entities are in a Harmonic Motion or
Oscillation with each other. That a specific DNA is in Harmony with a
specific Volume-of-Space and if it cannot live in the volume of space
where it is in physical harmony, then that DNA will have a shortened
lifespan.
Correlate Volume-of-Space with DNA genomes.
Graham Shepherd
Archimedes Plutonium wrote in message
<7h3bp9$5rg$1...@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>...
>In article <3734964D...@binax-nel.com>
>Nick Ferrala <nfer...@binax-nel.com> writes:
>
>> What you are saying makes no sense, man, as volume of space is
irrelevant.
>
> To the contrary, it makes alot of sense. Each DNA is coded for a size
>of that individual organism. Thus the DNA of a human cannot be born in
>a fish bowl nor a cell, but the DNA of a fungus is coded to be born in
>a fish bowl and the DNA of a bacteria is coded to be born inside a
>volume of space that is a cell.
>
> So, quite evidently DNA has coding for Volume-of-Space. So, from the
>very beginning of an individual DNA life, its birth, it has a coded
>relationship of either _in harmony_ with its volume of space or
>_disharmony_ with its volume of space.
<snipped rest>
This unfortunately breaks down completely when you realise that no matter
what organism you look at it's composed of cells; the cells are all pretty
much the same size; and some of the biggest multicellular organisms are
microrganisms (soil fungi in forests which can extend throughout hundreds of
cubic yards of soil). The DNA codes the cells and the cells then
differentiate in the more complex organisms. What you're really seeing is a
dispersal phenomenon. Bigger niches are more compex because they receive a
wider range of organisms arriving in them. If you compartmentalised a big
niche into lots of small ones, each would be much less complex.
GS