Received: by 10.68.195.165 with SMTP id if5mr1438914pbc.1.1336752846323;
        Fri, 11 May 2012 09:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: pr3ni14185pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p1g2000vbv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Wombat <tri...@multiweb.nl>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn,alt.atheism,alt.talk.creationism,sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Lucy FACTOID 101
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 09:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <dbc66ff4-5130-45a9-a3ec-f2f1556c7619@p1g2000vbv.googlegroups.com>
References: <dfritzin-BF3CEA.19050527032012@news.eternal-september.org>
 <d597af65-5758-4edc-bd08-b6a6bf45ec4f@ee2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <Jason-0605120037210001@66-53-223-53.stkn.mdsg-pacwest.com>
 <11ea9272-960a-47f6-8614-6c8614c2c605@z14g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
 <Jason-0605121442260001@66-53-218-213.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>
 <f76606da-fed1-4896-b742-ba6de8531388@m15g2000vbh.googlegroups.com>
 <Jason-0705120005530001@67-150-123-77.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com>
 <5e135653-2a78-4a9d-ac9f-2d945647caa1@n4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <d39f448d-1ec9-4268-ba2d-72e864c17b6d@n4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <b26d5826-426f-4c77-a3a6-b9b796fccb4b@a3g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <bc369b02-095b-490a-824b-ff5dc41a9211@p6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <60848f65-cb2f-407a-89a4-a83a0b8f8d19@n33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <144c9941-7690-401b-9119-e56dc261d77e@e3g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.107.208.123
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1336752846 26255 127.0.0.1 (11 May 2012 16:14:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:14:06 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: p1g2000vbv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.107.208.123; posting-account=FFMfogkAAAAjF0n7I5hx_oo00OIvVsFs
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like
 Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.168 Safari/535.19,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 11, 4:57=A0pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:

snip
>
> > > > I have been reading your ravings for some time now but have not yet
> > > > worked out whether you are OEC, like the late unlamentedJasonclaime=
d
> > > > to be or a YEC likeJason'sbosom buddies, the ICR? =A0BTW, what do y=
ou
> > > > know of angular unconformities?
>
> > > I don't belong to any of your supposal orgs. =A0The only unconformity
> > > that I can think of as worthy is the eroding at the top of the
> > > canyon. =A0It shows that erosion is a process that will happen if lay=
ers
> > > aren't happening quick and protected like the GC is. =A0The eroding a=
t
> > > the top is natural from after the Flood, onward.
>
> > > And the Canyon would have been ripe for a huge 'separating' when the
> > > layers would have not been yet hardened by the vast pressure of Flood
> > > runoff.
>
> > > wg
>
> > How high were the mud walls? =A0Also, how does water runoff harden mud?
> > Why am I not surprised you don't know about angular unconformities and
> > lacked the curiosity to find out?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I'm not sure where you cometh from or where you goeth, but why would
> water need to harden mud?? =A0I would think the harder the mud, the
> better, for global floodists.
>
> wg

YOU said "And the Canyon would have been ripe for a huge
'separating'(whatever the f*** that means) when the layers would have
not been yet hardened by the vast pressure of flood runoff."  It was
your point.  BTW, you carefully(?) avoided saying whether you are OEC
or YEC by "innocently" misconstruing my question above.  Please answer
it.
Have you looked up angular unconformities yet, particularly if you are
YEC?