Message from discussion
Lee/etc is a mental case: Here's the proof!
Received: by 10.224.213.1 with SMTP id gu1mr5475860qab.7.1350207210615;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.201.134 with SMTP id b6mr1147436yho.15.1350207210594; Sun,
14 Oct 2012 02:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r17ni24752519qap.0!nntp.google.com!l8no51105203qao.0!postnews.google.com!c20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 02:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Followup-To: alt.idiots
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: c20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=76.118.32.99; posting-account=Si1SKwoAAADpFF5n-E1OIJfy3ARZBlIl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.118.32.99
References: <502838C6.4862E502@hotmail.com> <bc5ea0dc-858e-4c0e-8328-04e87ddaa084@vt2g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
<1f53b149-8dcd-43a9-8121-179024e04f52@j14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
<c2eb6dbf-90b2-4aaf-b361-bb1040738bcc@ph9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
<c59055fc-8108-49a3-b302-e83b85ed815d@e14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
<641ca8b9-7757-47b6-98a1-8ccf1a447c9d@lo4g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
<ab35836e-e164-45cc-8e01-e0dd04ff5bd8@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
<c603734a-c78e-4fa4-9365-018bdd395c53@googlegroups.com> <43bf2ff5-a882-431f-b136-ecf276a38991@z8g2000yql.googlegroups.com>
<aba69f5a-6ce5-4287-8e86-3a5ac526fb1e@rj6g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <57300114-2ddb-4860-9149-83c1a41a776b@c20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Lee/etc is a mental case: Here's the proof!
From: JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:33:30 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
I'm sorry, mental case, but no matter how
much you want those I.P. Addresses to be
mine they are never going to be. Your
mental illness is steering you wrong, AGAIN!
Now, I repeat for you to not understand:
Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> If we were looking back on canine evolution from millions of years
> into the future we would conclude that toy terriers and great danes
> were members of different species. But they aren't. The same
> reasoning is applicable to hominids.
I hate to admit it, but you do have a point here. In
fact, it's worse than you make it out to be...
One COMMON argument against Neanderthal/Modern
interbreeding was that they were two different species,
and different species can't interbreed...
It was a seriously dumb argument even before all the
evidence for interbreeding, but there's an even more
comical example: The Triceratops Dinosaur!
Presently, the popular belief is that what was at one
time thought of as three separate species are actually
all members of the same species -- only at different
life stages!
And I have used the dog argument myself, many times.
It is undeniably true that, had all our current breeds
of dogs lived 50 million years ago instead of today,
"Scientist" would be claiming that they were all different
species... and just think of what they would have made
of our mutts!