Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
UFO/RBC FOUND IN LUNAR SKY
29 views
Skip to first unread message
Wretch Fossil
Apr 23, 2012, 10:38:17 AM4/23/12
to
The following Apollo 11 images show UFO or red blood cell remains in
the lunar sky:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267468&p=45
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267469&p=46
Sources of above images:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS11-40-5936
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5936.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
Read More At http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
the lunar sky:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267468&p=45
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044267469&p=46
Sources of above images:
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS11-40-5936
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5936.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
Read More At http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0
RichTravsky
Apr 23, 2012, 2:19:12 PM4/23/12
to
Apollo Lens Brush
...
The lens brush was first flown on Apollo 13 and first used on Apollo 14.
The following comes from the early stage of Apollo 15 EVA-2:
142:51:19 Scott: There. Get the lens brush out. Try to take care of those
lens. (Pause) Hey, that works pretty good.
142:51:31 Irwin: Work good?
142:51:32 Scott: Man, does it ever. Bright and shiny.
...
Andrew
Apr 23, 2012, 6:34:09 PM4/23/12
to
"Wretch Fossil" wrote in message news:49d1b631-a696-4c0d...@s10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
'appears' to be one giant neuron, as we now know, and is here
evidenced? -------> http://i33.tinypic.com/154vewh.jpg
How is it that these external and internal universes have such
similar structure, and at such vastly different physical scales?
Is it not that these similarities show the design and style of the
same Creator GOD
?
http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/06/05/two-universes-same-structure/
> The following Apollo 11 images show UFO or red blood
> cell remains in the lunar sky:
What does this compare with the fact that.. the entire Universe
> cell remains in the lunar sky:
'appears' to be one giant neuron, as we now know, and is here
evidenced? -------> http://i33.tinypic.com/154vewh.jpg
How is it that these external and internal universes have such
similar structure, and at such vastly different physical scales?
Is it not that these similarities show the design and style of the
same Creator GOD
?
http://www.neurevolution.net/2007/06/05/two-universes-same-structure/
Seth Dwight
Apr 27, 2012, 10:19:50 PM4/27/12
to
Jtem pointed out like 100 times that Dna is subject to selection.
he keeps explaining that selection can explain the Dna without
the need for any migration. To prove the point he even challenged
you to come up with a model for selective genes and a model where
all the genes are equal. Instead of responding you just keeping
posting the same bullshit. Jtem is right about you. You are very
fucked
up.
On Apr 26, 8:55 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "The interpretation of genetic evidence regarding modern human
> origins depends, among other things, on assessments of the
> structure and the variation of ancient populations. Becausewe lack
> genetic data from the time when the first anatomically modern
> humans appeared, between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago, instead
> we exploit the phenotype of neurocranial geometry to compare
> the variation in early modern human fossils with that in other
> groups of fossil Homo and recent modern humans. Variation is
> assessed as the mean-squared Procrustes distance from the group
> average shape in a representation based on several hundred
> neurocranial landmarks and semilandmarks.We ?nd that the early
> modern group has more shape variation than any other group in
> our sample, which covers 1.8 million years, and that they are
> morphologically similar to recent modern humans of diverse geo-
> graphically dispersed populations but not to archaic groups. Of the
> currently competing models of modern human origins, some are
> inconsistent with these ?ndings. Rather than a single out-of-Africa
> dispersal scenario, we suggest that early modern humans were
> already divided into different populations in Pleistocene Africa,
> after which there followed a complex migration pattern. Our
> conclusions bear implications for the inference of ancient human
> demography from genetic models and emphasize the importance
> of focusing research on those early modern humans, in particular,
> in Africa."
>
> Gunz et al.
> Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided
> population
> structure and a complex
> out-of-Africa scenario
> PNAS # April 14, 2009 # vol. 106 # no. 15
he keeps explaining that selection can explain the Dna without
the need for any migration. To prove the point he even challenged
you to come up with a model for selective genes and a model where
all the genes are equal. Instead of responding you just keeping
posting the same bullshit. Jtem is right about you. You are very
fucked
up.
On Apr 26, 8:55 am, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "The interpretation of genetic evidence regarding modern human
> origins depends, among other things, on assessments of the
> structure and the variation of ancient populations. Becausewe lack
> genetic data from the time when the first anatomically modern
> humans appeared, between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago, instead
> we exploit the phenotype of neurocranial geometry to compare
> the variation in early modern human fossils with that in other
> groups of fossil Homo and recent modern humans. Variation is
> assessed as the mean-squared Procrustes distance from the group
> average shape in a representation based on several hundred
> neurocranial landmarks and semilandmarks.We ?nd that the early
> modern group has more shape variation than any other group in
> our sample, which covers 1.8 million years, and that they are
> morphologically similar to recent modern humans of diverse geo-
> graphically dispersed populations but not to archaic groups. Of the
> currently competing models of modern human origins, some are
> inconsistent with these ?ndings. Rather than a single out-of-Africa
> dispersal scenario, we suggest that early modern humans were
> already divided into different populations in Pleistocene Africa,
> after which there followed a complex migration pattern. Our
> conclusions bear implications for the inference of ancient human
> demography from genetic models and emphasize the importance
> of focusing research on those early modern humans, in particular,
> in Africa."
>
> Gunz et al.
> Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided
> population
> structure and a complex
> out-of-Africa scenario
> PNAS # April 14, 2009 # vol. 106 # no. 15
Seth Dwight
Apr 27, 2012, 10:22:38 PM4/27/12
to
Jtem offered a great explanation that refutes this. If you honestly
think that selection alone will not account for a change in Dna
over time, explain why the theory of evolution is wrong. Spammer.
think that selection alone will not account for a change in Dna
over time, explain why the theory of evolution is wrong. Spammer.
Lee Olsen
Apr 27, 2012, 11:55:28 PM4/27/12
to
Abstract
Although fossil remains show that anatomically modern humans
dispersed
out of Africa into the Near East ;100 to 130 ka, genetic evidence
from
extant populations has suggested that non-Africans descend primarily
from a single successful later migration. Within the human
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) tree, haplogroup L3 encompasses not only
many sub-Saharan
Africans but also all ancient non-African lineages, and its age
therefore provides an upper bound for the dispersal out of Africa. An
analysis of 369 complete African L3 sequences places thismaximumat;70
ka, virtually ruling out a successful exit before 74 ka, the date of
the Toba volcanic supereruption in Sumatra. The similarity of the age
of L3 to its two non-African daughter
haplogroups, M and N, suggests that the same process was likely
responsible for both the L3 expansion in Eastern Africa and the
dispersal of a small group ofmodern humans out of Africa to settle
the
rest of the world. The timing of the expansion of L3 suggests a link
to improved climatic conditions after;70 ka in Eastern and
CentralAfrica rather than to symbolicallymediated
behavior, which evidently arose considerably earlier. The L3 mtDNA
pool within Africa suggests a migration from Eastern Africa to
Central
Africa ;60 to 35 ka and major migrations in the immediate postglacial
again linked to climate. The largest population size increase seen in
the L3 data is 3–4 ka in Central Africa, corresponding to Bantu
expansions, leading diverse L3 lineages to spread into Eastern and
Southern Africa in the last 3–2 ka.
Pedro Soares, et al.
The Expansion of mtDNA Haplogroup L3 within and out of
Africa
Mol. Biol. Evol. 29(3):915–927. 2012
Although fossil remains show that anatomically modern humans
dispersed
out of Africa into the Near East ;100 to 130 ka, genetic evidence
from
extant populations has suggested that non-Africans descend primarily
from a single successful later migration. Within the human
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) tree, haplogroup L3 encompasses not only
many sub-Saharan
Africans but also all ancient non-African lineages, and its age
therefore provides an upper bound for the dispersal out of Africa. An
analysis of 369 complete African L3 sequences places thismaximumat;70
ka, virtually ruling out a successful exit before 74 ka, the date of
the Toba volcanic supereruption in Sumatra. The similarity of the age
of L3 to its two non-African daughter
haplogroups, M and N, suggests that the same process was likely
responsible for both the L3 expansion in Eastern Africa and the
dispersal of a small group ofmodern humans out of Africa to settle
the
rest of the world. The timing of the expansion of L3 suggests a link
to improved climatic conditions after;70 ka in Eastern and
CentralAfrica rather than to symbolicallymediated
behavior, which evidently arose considerably earlier. The L3 mtDNA
pool within Africa suggests a migration from Eastern Africa to
Central
Africa ;60 to 35 ka and major migrations in the immediate postglacial
again linked to climate. The largest population size increase seen in
the L3 data is 3–4 ka in Central Africa, corresponding to Bantu
expansions, leading diverse L3 lineages to spread into Eastern and
Southern Africa in the last 3–2 ka.
Pedro Soares, et al.
The Expansion of mtDNA Haplogroup L3 within and out of
Africa
Mol. Biol. Evol. 29(3):915–927. 2012
JTEM
Apr 28, 2012, 5:07:36 AM4/28/12
to
LeeTurd, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "A number of studies have suggested that Basques might be a relic of
> Mesolithic Europeans who escaped much of the homogenization brought
> about by the Neolithic expansion.
Great. And you think this means... what?
You keep proving my point. You keep posting random
shit that you don't understand, most of it having no
relevance what so ever to any exchange (ever), and
you seem completely oblivious to all of this.
In short: You're fucked in the head.
> "A number of studies have suggested that Basques might be a relic of
> Mesolithic Europeans who escaped much of the homogenization brought
> about by the Neolithic expansion.
Great. And you think this means... what?
You keep proving my point. You keep posting random
shit that you don't understand, most of it having no
relevance what so ever to any exchange (ever), and
you seem completely oblivious to all of this.
In short: You're fucked in the head.
Lee Olsen
Apr 28, 2012, 11:49:55 AM4/28/12
to
It means you don't know a fish from a mongongo nut.
Don't forget to take your Omega-3s from source of your choice.
Anything else I can help you with today?
Don't forget to take your Omega-3s from source of your choice.
Anything else I can help you with today?
0 new messages