Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Thermoregulation in Homo, and persistence hunting
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
RichTravsky  
View profile  
 More options Oct 14 2012, 11:18 pm
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
From: RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:19:01 -0600
Local: Sun, Oct 14 2012 11:19 pm
Subject: Re: Thermoregulation in Homo, and persistence hunting

Claudius Denk wrote:

> On Oct 6, 10:06 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Claudius Denk wrote:
> > > On Sep 28, 7:49 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Claudius Denk wrote:
> > > > > On Sep 21, 5:13 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Claudius Denk wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sep 15, 8:35 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > RichTravsky wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Claudius Denk wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sep 4, 8:52 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > RichTravsky wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > Claudius Denk wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 16, 8:21 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Claudius Denk wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Aug 12, 8:23 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > RichTravsky wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul Crowley wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/07/2012 04:11, RichTravsky wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >http://www.south-africa-tours-and-travel.com/images/herd-of-springbok...

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> You understand as little about evolution or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> nature as your friend Jimmie.  The whole point
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> of those huge herds of herbivores is that they
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> move quickly through the landscape.  Local
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> lions packs have full bellies for a week or two,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (but make almost no impression on those
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> herds).  The lions then starve for most of the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> rest of the year, and will eat anything they can

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lie. Unless you can back that up.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TV teams commonly follow individual lion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > prides over time -- showing how they all get
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thinner and thinner in the lean months, and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > how most of the young die off.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you ahve something other than a tv show in support?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do YOU think it works?  Why don't lion
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > prides steadily expand in size and numbers
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in view of the apparently endless surplus of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > readily available food?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > They did, before human hunting pressure.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No answer.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have any questions that aren't lame?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Too tough for you and Pollie? Tsk.

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, once again:

> > > > > > > > > > > > > >  How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is your argument?

> > > > > > > > > > > > No, it's a question. Notice the question mark at the end? That, Clod,
> > > > > > > > > > > > means a question is being asked.

> > > > > > > > > > > > Apparently a really hard one...

> > > > > > > > > > > Waiting.

> > > > > > > > > > Keep waiting.

> > > > > > > > > Ah, are we being too hard on you?

> > > > > > > > > How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > > > > > How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > > > > > How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > > > > > heh heh

> > > > > > > > Oh Cloddie... Apply logic to this simple question, ok?

> > > > > > > > How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > > > Thank you for helping me demonstrate my point: Modern
> > > > > > > anthropology is a consensus of silence, pretending they
> > > > > > > have all the right answers when in actuality they don't
> > > > > > > even have the right questions.

> > > > > > Thank you for dodging again.

> > > > > > Now, this is a simple (for you) question:

> > > > > >  How come those poor lions don't totally starve and go extinct?

> > > > > It's not the fact that you don't have a hypothesis that is the
> > > > > problem.  It's the fact that you don't have a hypothesis and you are
> > > > > concealing this fact from our audience so that our audience doesn't
> > > > > realize the depths of your cluelessness.

> > > > I have said before I have not presented any hypothesis.

> > > Are you actively attempting to rectify this shortcoming?  If not then
> > > why do you insert yourself into a discussion dedicated to this very
> > > subject?

> > Now, one more time:  How come those poor lions don't totally starve
> > and go extinct?
> > Are you actively attempting to support your own "hypothesis"? If not
> > then why do you insert yourself into a discussion dedicated to this
> > very subject?

> It's not the fact that you don't have a hypothesis
> that is the problem.  It's the fact that you don't
> have a hypothesis and you are concealing this
> fact from our audience so that our audience
> doesn't realize the depths of your cluelessness.

Gosh Dimmie, is this your fallback excuse when confronted with...
uncomforatable questions?

Now, one more time:  How come those poor lions don't totally starve
and go extinct?

Are you actively attempting to support your own "hypothesis"? If not
then why do you insert yourself into a discussion dedicated to this
very subject?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.