Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Paleoanthropology is a fake science, take II
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
JTEM  
View profile  
 More options Oct 24 2012, 4:22 am
Newsgroups: sci.archaeology, sci.anthropology.paleo
Followup-To: alt.idiots
From: JTEM <jte...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 01:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Oct 24 2012 4:22 am
Subject: Re: Paleoanthropology is a fake science, take II
This is amazing.  I mean, it’s truly staggering.
What follows is the application of the exact
same argument I have seen from Young
Earth Creationists many, many times, and
yet it’s supposedly coming from a person
of science:

“For a long time, everyone assumed that
homo erectus evolved from homo habilis
[1.44 million to 2.3 million years], but later
it appeared that homo erectus and homo
habilis lived side by side in Africa for
hundreds of thousands of years, so one
cannot evolve into another and both survive,”
Ferring said. “That raises the question
where homo erectus came from.”

This argument usually takes the form of,
“If we evolved from Apes then how come
there are still apes?”

Evolution isn’t magic.  A species doesn’t
just transform into something else.  The
usual explanation is that evolution doesn’t
work on a species at all, it works on a
population.  In other words, Dinosaurs
didn’t evolve into birds, and even a specific
species of Dinosaurs didn’t evolve into
birds.  What we think happened is that a
specific population of a specific species
evolved into birds.  There could have
been hundreds of other populations of
that species — thousands even — and
there would be no reason for them all to
go extinct just because the environment
& genetics combined in such a way as
to allow one group to evolve into birds.

You can read the rest of it (and find a link
to the original article) here:

http://jtem.tumblr.com/post/32140062383


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.