Received: by 10.68.238.198 with SMTP id vm6mr6506125pbc.3.1328335123335;
        Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Path: lh20ni258456pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!pm3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo
Subject: Re: Links to Ecological Gatekeeper Hypothesis
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 21:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <6802a4aa-b70a-4926-807a-9d9fc2727185@pm3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
References: <d472d0e8-6cf3-488b-80da-475b76f8c1a8@k28g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
 <f263d11d-b060-4620-874b-673d874776c0@y5g2000pbk.googlegroups.com>
 <70eb43d8-a4fa-413c-a8bd-4975ad246a52@i18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
 <d2d6f208-50fe-45a7-b8fc-583b98137f54@sk8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <97962edb-49ab-461a-8395-0f35fda64daf@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
 <fe745052-3069-4d35-b76b-2fa441027b5b@qv4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <e990745f-9f87-4130-870a-6cc41912966c@f5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
 <faee89f3-193a-44e6-aab7-293d99d19d4a@g4g2000pbi.googlegroups.com> <e30b77b0-44aa-4e9b-adc2-72c5bb6ad2f1@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.114.103.226
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328335123 9324 127.0.0.1 (4 Feb 2012 05:58:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 05:58:43 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: pm3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=97.114.103.226; posting-account=qDV0SwkAAAA_Kw-D3zmf7uXtBWQ6Ctyx
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/5.0),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 3, 9:25=A0pm, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
> I don't know why you bother, Lee. =A0It's not like anybody reading this
> won't just go upthread and see the questions that you are avoiding.

Feb 3, 7:47 pm Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


> No response.


How much more of a response do you think you need?

So you didn't read very well.

>  They just don't support your claims.

Yes they do.

> In
> fact, in one you indicate that there were springs


.....in the margins. Try to read for comprhension


> and streams


Nice try at bait and switch. They didn't say streams. They said
"ephemeral" which means "dry" most of the year, a point which you
managed to leave out of  your reply.  This is not consistent with
gardens, except possibly during the short wet season.
I think I see your problem now, you simply can't read.

(snip rest of reply until you can learn to read for comprehension)


That applies to just about every comment you have ever made on this
list.
So go back to school... try learning to read before taking up
something as complicated as anthropology.