> On Nov 10, 9:35 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Claudius Denk wrote:

> > > On Nov 4, 8:25 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Claudius Denk wrote:

> > > > > On Oct 22, 10:55 am, Claudius Denk <claudiusd...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > > > > > On Oct 21, 6:48 pm, RichTravsky <traRvEskyM...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > Claudius Denk wrote:

> > > > > > > > Travsky:
> > > > > > > > All you did was take territorial defense and twist it around.

> > > > > > > > Claudius Denk:
> > > > > > > > What's your explanation for the selective origins of the
> > > > > > > > most communally territorialistic, communicative, and
> > > > > > > > conscious species ever known to exist?  Let me guess.
> > > > > > > > You have early hominids, crude tools in hand, chasing
> > > > > > > > down Kudu, long-distance, through treeless savanna,
> > > > > > > > outrunning sabertoothed lions and bear-sized hyena?
> > > > > > > > All in all, your own hypothetical thinking is so blatantly
> > > > > > > > stupid that you are embarrassed to even be associated
> > > > > > > > with it. Moreover, now that that the aquatic ape loons
> > > > > > > > have, thankfully, abandoned this newsgroup you no
> > > > > > > > longer have a means to look smart in comparison.

> > > > > > > > VTSkier:
> > > > > > > > All you have done is try to redefine existing terms to
> > > > > > > > support your assertion. No scientific argument, no
> > > > > > > > thesis, no hypothesis, just an assertion that a task
> > > > > > > > (pest control) constitutes agriculture. It doesn't. The
> > > > > > > > task may be valuable to those who do practice
> > > > > > > > agriculture, but in and of itself, it's not agriculture.

> > > > > > > > CD:

> > > > > > > DJM: still no evidence and still making up his own definitions for things
> > > > > > > like agriculture.

> > > > > > Vagueness and misdirection are the only tactics you losers got left.

> > > > > Put up or shut up.

> > > > Like asking you to provide evidence?

> > > > "there is no data to confirm or deny any of it"

> > > Tell us how long distance running explains the origins of language?

> > Who said it did?

> > And yet, we both have language and can run for miles and miles...

> > How does your "hype-othesis" explain this?

> Why participate in a discussion group if you don't want to discuss
> anything?