the need for any migration. To prove the point he even challenged
all the genes are equal. Instead of responding you just keeping
posting the same bullshit. Jtem is right about you. You are very
> "The interpretation of genetic evidence regarding modern human
> origins depends, among other things, on assessments of the
> structure and the variation of ancient populations. Becausewe lack
> genetic data from the time when the first anatomically modern
> humans appeared, between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago, instead
> we exploit the phenotype of neurocranial geometry to compare
> the variation in early modern human fossils with that in other
> groups of fossil Homo and recent modern humans. Variation is
> assessed as the mean-squared Procrustes distance from the group
> average shape in a representation based on several hundred
> neurocranial landmarks and semilandmarks.We ?nd that the early
> modern group has more shape variation than any other group in
> our sample, which covers 1.8 million years, and that they are
> morphologically similar to recent modern humans of diverse geo-
> graphically dispersed populations but not to archaic groups. Of the
> currently competing models of modern human origins, some are
> inconsistent with these ?ndings. Rather than a single out-of-Africa
> dispersal scenario, we suggest that early modern humans were
> already divided into different populations in Pleistocene Africa,
> after which there followed a complex migration pattern. Our
> conclusions bear implications for the inference of ancient human
> demography from genetic models and emphasize the importance
> of focusing research on those early modern humans, in particular,
> in Africa."
> Gunz et al.
> Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided
> population
> structure and a complex
> out-of-Africa scenario
> PNAS # April 14, 2009 # vol. 106 # no. 15
