Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 2, 10:55 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
Sept 23, 10:20 pm
JTEM: "We weren't
us until our ancestors did the nasty with Neanderthals,
according to all the data."
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 4, 1:01 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
The psycho sock puppet thinks people walk to islands by following a
coast:
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 39
Message-ID:
<aab8f3f1-41f3-486e-91da-9671dfabc...@c17g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
JTEM: "Two issues: No Homo reached Flores stepping over Crocs,
they had to do it following the coast...."
Hey moron, if you followed a coast, you would never cross the water.
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 5, 10:27 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
The idiot JTEM thinks shell middens are boats:
"Archaeologists have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
13,000 years old"
Message-ID: <9d955fbd-9672-4d43-a554-
f45c5d16a...@q12g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
"The point is that the remains do not match those of the supposed
Beringer
population."
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
On Oct 6, 10:59 pm, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
> Sick fuck
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
<snip rant>
Hey moron, post a photo of these imaginary 13 kya boats.
Put up or shut up.
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 13, 12:19 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
"The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
“We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
(5,000 to 6,000 years ago)"
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
Worse, much worse is the fact that the cite talks about
much, much, much, much, much earlier evidence for
boats everywhere from Japan to Australia. His cite
supports boats. His cite concludes that boats had been
around for a very, very long time before the first
settlers to the America's arrived. And, as i quote above,
his cite absolute-positively confirms that boats where in
use in the Americas at least 13,000 years ago.
....and yet he repeatedly (even habitually) posted a
cherry-picked quote saying that there is no evidence of
boats until 6,000 years ago. It's a quote that the cite he
lifted it from refutes, but he doesn't care.
Some people are mentally ill, and the Lee/etc sick fuck
is amongst the worst... and the stupidest.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 14, 2:37 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
> : Maritime people did have boats off the North American
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
> : same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
> : which could have only been reached by boat from the
> : mainland.
Look at this poor idiot, JTEM thinks a shell midden is a boat and
people can't swim.
"only'? Really?
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys!
http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer, an
anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that boats do not
exist in the archaeological record that far back. “We lack any
evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times (5,000 to 6,000 years
ago) along the Northwest Coast and along the coast of Alaska. In the
absence of any evidence of boats whatsoever, you probably have them
walking along coastlines. The idea that people would be crossing
entire oceans in the rafting technology that would have been available
in those days doesn’t make a lot of sense to me.”
Of course there are some illiterates out there who think shell
middens are boats and think Paleo people couldn't swim.
Everyone should know by now that the channel islands were less than 10
km during Paleo times during periods of low sea levels. People today
routinely swim three times that far, even kids can do it.
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
On Oct 18, 7:21 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
Another no-evidence spam post.
The fact remains shell middens are not boats and
proven by:
http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139The problem with the boat-
migration model, says David Meltzer, an anthropologist at Southern
Methodist University, is that boats do not exist in the archaeological
record that far back. “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-
Holocene times (5,000 to 6,000 years ago) along the Northwest Coast
and along the coast of Alaska. In the absence of any evidence of boats
whatsoever, you probably have them walking along coastlines. The idea
that people would be crossing entire oceans in the rafting technology
that would have been available in those days doesn’t make a lot of
sense to me.”
Check this out. The Lee/Rich/Steve/Larry/etc
psycho dishonestly cherry picks the following:
Sick fuck, Lee Olsen <paleoc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> And you can't read:http://www.scseagrant.org/Content/?cid=139 > "The problem with the boat-migration model, says David Meltzer,
> an anthropologist at Southern Methodist University, is that
> boats do not exist in the archaeological record that far back.
> “We lack any evidence of boats until the mid-Holocene times
> (5,000 to 6,000 years ago)
But a little further down WITHIN THE EXACT SAME SITE
we find this contradiction:
: Maritime people did have boats off the North American
: West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
: same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
: have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
: 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
: which could have only been reached by boat from the
: mainland. The oldest human bones—a woman’s—
: found in North America, excavated in the Channel
: Islands, are about 13,000 years old
So he's making a claim that his own site destroys.
"JTEM" <j_deerfi...@hotmail.com>
Jack Teehan <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight <deerfieldproducti...@gmail.com>
Seth Dwight: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
In His Glory: NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.232.83.153
On Oct 26, 3:58 am, JTEM <jte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Check this out.
> : Maritime people did have boats off the North American
> : West Coast at least 13,000 years ago—or about the
> : same time as Clovis people arrived. Archaeologists
> : have excavated shell middens dated to 12,000 to
> : 13,000 years old in the Channel Islands off California,
So, the crazy sock puppet still thinks shell middens are boats,
amazing.
