Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Does schema.org support global identifiers for items?

Received: by 10.227.201.148 with SMTP id fa20mr43590wbb.14.1308740220126;
        Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: schemaorg-discussion@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.106.37 with SMTP id v37ls248196wbo.1.gmail; Wed, 22 Jun
 2011 03:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.173.76 with SMTP id o12mr44086wbz.6.1308740218014;
        Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.173.76 with SMTP id o12mr44085wbz.6.1308740217986;
        Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <kide...@openlinksw.com>
Received: from mail.openlinksw.com (mail.openlinksw.com [63.119.36.38])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4si503130wbn.3.2011.06.22.03.56.56
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 22 Jun 2011 03:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kide...@openlinksw.com designates 63.119.36.38 as permitted sender) client-ip=63.119.36.38;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kide...@openlinksw.com designates 63.119.36.38 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kide...@openlinksw.com
Received: from host-84-13-162-113.opaltelecom.net ([84.13.162.113] helo=Macintosh-96.local)
	by mail.openlinksw.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.74)
	(envelope-from <kide...@openlinksw.com>)
	id 1QZL79-0004yJ-En
	for schemaorg-discussion@googlegroups.com; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:56:55 -0400
Message-ID: <4E01CA75.4040002@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:56:53 +0100
From: Kingsley Idehen <kide...@openlinksw.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: schemaorg-discussion@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Does schema.org support global identifiers for items?
References: <BANLkTimvRPyW8csbrZeXTz1Rrn5mX8wPxw@mail.gmail.com> <F82E0E49-DA92-4D39-A69D-38612334A3BA@gmail.com> <BANLkTim9b+MyZcPfqVRLbOP_0uic1=YM=Q@mail.gmail.com> <4E01C97A.2010202@yahoo-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E01C97A.2010...@yahoo-inc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 6/22/11 11:52 AM, Peter Mika wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> We plan to provide an example showing the usage of itemid, and also 
> examples showing the usage of microdata in the header.

Even if you weren't, as Martin already explained, it shouldn't be 
disallowed, removed, or undermined in anyway. Its part of the spec.

Kingsley
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> On 6/22/11 12:44 PM, Philip J�genstedt wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:26, Martin Hepp<mfh...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Please, do not disallow global identifiers for items!
>>> This is key for helping search engines to connect dots distributed 
>>> across large e-commerce shop sites.
>> Only if the sponsors actually do something with it, hence the
>> question. If they do something with it, then I hope it's going to be
>> documented.
>>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen