Received: by 10.42.18.3 with SMTP id v3mr1858174ica.4.1309926534157;
        Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: schemaorg-discussion@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.57.198 with SMTP id d6ls1818553ibh.2.gmail; Tue, 05 Jul
 2011 21:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.154.70 with SMTP id p6mr475279icw.15.1309926533366;
        Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.154.70 with SMTP id p6mr475278icw.15.1309926533352;
        Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <g...@google.com>
Received: from mail-iw0-f198.google.com (mail-iw0-f198.google.com [209.85.214.198])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w7si3063452icv.6.2011.07.05.21.28.53
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of g...@google.com designates 209.85.214.198 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.198;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of g...@google.com designates 209.85.214.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=g...@google.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@google.com
Received: by iwc38 with SMTP id 38so8800739iwc.1
        for <schemaorg-discussion@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=beta;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=8gHGf7Wj/HLNepThSdzy015azydPEyr5fsOMYVQqCN0=;
        b=mTIfRBa5tvWtE8T9nG90attQl4oSNWgiPLox5TkMWJyCPqJa0x3E83IYZe6VuPHCFs
         mYZg1XTlUG5n4Tfdstbw==
Received: by 10.42.155.73 with SMTP id t9mr3291264icw.216.1309926533294;
        Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.155.73 with SMTP id t9mr3291255icw.216.1309926532684; Tue,
 05 Jul 2011 21:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.36.193 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 21:28:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <68056fc3-128a-424b-9eaf-2ff0ea17573d@t5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
References: <68056fc3-128a-424b-9eaf-2ff0ea175...@t5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
From: Guha <g...@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 21:28:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPAGhv_3B6H7L=86EsFsEN_aM7uxjJ5aAhX1fioGAOXm0yw...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: data-vocabulary vs schema.org
To: schemaorg-discussion@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba61358aa99a2e04a75f09fd

--90e6ba61358aa99a2e04a75f09fd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sorry about this. We will fix it asap.

guha

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:57 AM, alexis <alexisgol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've noticed that when I use google's rich snippets testing tool
> (http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets), if I use the
> older data-vocabulary.org vocabs I get a preview rich snippet, whereas
> if I use schema.org, even by copy/pasting in some of their examples, I
> do NOT get a preview.
>
> I would rather use schema.org since it has more extensive
> vocabularies, but I was wondering why this might be and if others are
> noticing this as well?
>
> Alexis
>

--90e6ba61358aa99a2e04a75f09fd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Sorry about this. We will fix it asap.<div><br></div><div>guha<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:57 AM, alexis <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:alexisgol...@gmail.com">alexisgol...@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>

<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Hi all,<br>
<br>
I&#39;ve noticed that when I use google&#39;s rich snippets testing tool<br>
(<a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets</a>), if I use the<br>
older <a href="http://data-vocabulary.org" target="_blank">data-vocabulary.org</a> vocabs I get a preview rich snippet, whereas<br>
if I use <a href="http://schema.org" target="_blank">schema.org</a>, even by copy/pasting in some of their examples, I<br>
do NOT get a preview.<br>
<br>
I would rather use <a href="http://schema.org" target="_blank">schema.org</a> since it has more extensive<br>
vocabularies, but I was wondering why this might be and if others are<br>
noticing this as well?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Alexis<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>

--90e6ba61358aa99a2e04a75f09fd--