How About Examples
黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang)
Dzonatas Sol
Schema is the non-technical side of schematics, without the diagram.
This is why the ideal schema is only two-levels deep. How those two
levels are defined is B2B (or, URN specified, where depth is four
params, or one more than octal).
Also known as "futhark" and "futhork", yet bare in mind there is no
standard "tek" mode. This is the non-unicode way to type that "vocab"
system.
Less commonly known, limits are within "accessibilities", or how that
word is allowed to translate through the futhark OR futhork. Due to the
sensitivity of accessibility, there is no best example, yet historic
"artifacts" are reasonable given that words means the less-than-best
accessibility in all known ways.
--
--- http://twitter.com/Dzonatas_Sol ---
Web Development, Software Engineering
Ag-Biotech, Virtual Reality, Consultant
Dzonatas Sol
<http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:9913>
Add xml-entities as desired...
Shawn Simister
Kingsley Idehen
You can see some good usage of schema.org microdata here:
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:47 PM, 黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang) <g9414002.pccu.edu.tw@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, everyone! Users and newbies are coming to play withschema.org. Is there any idea about providing collectionsor hubs for demonstration of microdata with schema.org orother vocabulary systems?
See the following bookmarked links demonstrating Microdata extraction:
1. http://www.delicious.com/kidehen/microdata_demo
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
skygod
understand why Shawn cites http://www.imamuseum.org/art/collections as
'good' usage.
It starts by using
<div class="content" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/
CreativeWork">
but then allocates a number of itemprops that I cannot see as being
valid
itemprop="collection"
itemprop="materials"
itemprop="dimensions"
itemprop="creditLine"
itemprop="accessionNumber"
We are now more than a month into the schema.org initiative and it
would appear that there is still considerable confusion as to how to
implement the necessary code with any success.
I'm still at a loss as to how to implement schema tagging effectively
for real estate listings and do not wish to have to recode customer
websites multiple times to get it right. To get all the information
listed, I need to use Product, Place, LocalBusiness and Offer however
these types would only appear to be available using CreativeWork and
defining a house as CreativeWork just doesn't seem right.
Shawn Simister
黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang)
Martin Hepp
As long as you use full URIs for additional properties, there should be no problem for search engines to properly fetch and interpret them.
For example, you can use the shipping information property from GoodRelations in combination with http://schema.org/Offer:
<!-- on the offer page, indicate this delivery option -->
<div itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Offer" itemid="#offer">
<div itemprop="name">Hepp Technology Color TV</div>
<div itemprop="description">This TV set is the ideal multimedia center for your home</div>
Delivery:
<a itemprop="http://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#availableDeliveryMethods"
href="hhttp://purl.org/goodrelations/v1#UPS">via UPS</a>
<!-- other offer properties follow here -->
...
</div>
Martin
--------------------------------------------------------
martin hepp
e-business & web science research group
universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen
e-mail: he...@ebusiness-unibw.org
phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217
fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620
www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group)
http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal)
skype: mfhepp
twitter: mfhepp
Lawrence Woodman
https://github.com/LawrenceWoodman/mida/wiki/Sites-Using-Microdata
It would be great if anyone wants to add any sites that they create or find.
--
vLife Systems Ltd
Registered Office: The Meridian, 4 Copthall House, Station Square, Coventry, CV1 2FL
Registered in England and Wales No. 06477649
http://vlifesystems.com
Michael Hausenblas
We collect examples in all kinds of formats via
https://github.com/mhausenblas/schema-org-rdf/tree/master/examples
just send in a pull request ;)
Cheers,
Michael
Kingsley Idehen
> On 08/07/11 05:47, 黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang) wrote:
>> Hello, everyone! Users and newbies are coming to play with
>> schema.org. Is there any idea about providing collections
>> or hubs for demonstration of microdata with schema.org or
>> other vocabulary systems?
>>
> The Mida wiki has a page that lists sites using Schema.org at:
> https://github.com/LawrenceWoodman/mida/wiki/Sites-Using-Microdata
>
> It would be great if anyone wants to add any sites that they create or
> find.
>
Great!
Update my bookmark collection at:
http://www.delicious.com/kidehen/microdata_demo, accordingly :-)
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
President& CEO
Guha
All:
As long as you use full URIs for additional properties, there should be no problem for search engines to properly fetch and interpret them.
László Török
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Martin Hepp <mfh...@gmail.com> wrote:All:
As long as you use full URIs for additional properties, there should be no problem for search engines to properly fetch and interpret them.I want to be clear about this --- search engines cannot be expected to 'correctly' interpret arbitrary properties they do not know anything about, irrespective of whether you use full URIs, namespaces, curies or whatever else.
Las
--
Guha
Dan Brickley
> You can see some good usage of schema.org microdata here:
> http://www.imamuseum.org/art/collections
> http://tagger.steve.museum/steve/object
Great to see museums exploring this. I was just talking with
colleagues about how schema.org fits in alongside cultural heritage
metadata. For example http://schema.org/Painting is a little erm
sparse compared to some of the controlled vocabularies that have been
used for describing art, museum objects etc.
Is there some potential role for Freebase here, bridging the
medium-sized schema.org vocabulary with much larger, community-curated
efforts? Where do SKOS and thesauri, subject classification etc fit
into the schema.org picture for describing cultural heritage?
cheers,
Dan
Shawn Simister
On 10 July 2011 04:35, Shawn Simister <simi...@google.com> wrote:Great to see museums exploring this. I was just talking with
> You can see some good usage of schema.org microdata here:
> http://www.imamuseum.org/art/collections
> http://tagger.steve.museum/steve/object
colleagues about how schema.org fits in alongside cultural heritage
metadata. For example http://schema.org/Painting is a little erm
sparse compared to some of the controlled vocabularies that have been
used for describing art, museum objects etc.
Is there some potential role for Freebase here, bridging the
medium-sized schema.org vocabulary with much larger, community-curated
efforts? Where do SKOS and thesauri, subject classification etc fit
into the schema.org picture for describing cultural heritage?
cheers,
Dan
- It allows each institution to determine which extensions best model their data and not have to refactor all their data to fit the Freebase schema or agree on one unifying schema right out of the gate.
- It lets the institutions host the metadata on their own sites so that they get the search visibility rather than Freebase.
- It doesn't force these institutions to address the difficult task of reconciling their data against Freebase as a pre-condition to publishing structured data.
Kingsley Idehen
I'm obviously a huge advocate of all things Freebase but first and foremost I want to see more structured data on the web and I see schema.org as a really simple way of making that happen.
I encourage you to bottle the statement: "I want to see more structured data on the web" . It should be your tag line re. purpose of schema.org esp. as it relates to the strategic goals of its principals.
GOLDEN!
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
demonscars
http://www.mediadecay.com/movie_review/punching-the-clown/
If you visit the site every different category (Music, Film, TV, and
Books) all use Schema.org microdata in reviews. I do hope it is
implemented correctly.
On Jul 8, 12:55 am, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Lawrence Woodman
> My site is using Schema.org microdata. An example page would be
> http://www.mediadecay.com/movie_review/punching-the-clown/
>
> If you visit the site every different category (Music, Film, TV, and
> Books) all use Schema.org microdata in reviews. I do hope it is
> implemented correctly.
However there is a problem with the schema.org use, which isn't
really your fault. On the http://schema.org/Movie page the spec
mentions using Person to describe the director, author and actors, but
the examples use Person. Person doesn't exist in the full schema list,
so I'm guessing that this was done in error. If I were you, I would wrap
each person in the http://schema.org/Person vocabulary, as properties
can take multiple values without problem.
I have left feedback about this problem at schema.org (Along with many
other problems; I hope they are not getting sick of hearing from me!)
As I side note, have you ever thought about giving the reviews a
numerical rating? The reason I say, is that when the reviews appear
in the search results. Those that have had the rating picked out and
displayed as stars, really do stand out.
Scott
schema.org examples.
Scott
On Jul 7, 11:47 pm, 黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang)
Charlie Jiang
Dzonatas Sol
may assist .NET.
I do not have any obvious object file when any site like that writes
"itself" for SEO. Treat Engine Optimization for Halloween walk distance?
FUD.
demonscars
the people are surrounded by things like <... itemprop="director"
itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/People"> then <span
itemprop="name"> like on the http://schema.org/Movie example.
As for the numeric rating, while it would be a positive for search
engines, it's just not how the site is meant to be used. The reviews
are meant more as general guides to good things and bad things about
each item reviewed and is less "black and white" I guess would be the
best way to put it. It is something I have been putting more thought
into though as I do like the way the Google Rich Snippets display
stars.
On Jul 12, 1:45 am, Lawrence Woodman <lwood...@vlifesystems.com>
wrote:
> >http://www.mediadecay.com/movie_review/punching-the-clown/
>
> > If you visit the site every different category (Music, Film, TV, and
> > Books) all use Schema.org microdata in reviews. I do hope it is
> > implemented correctly.
>
> I have just run your site through Mida and the microdata looks fine.
> However there is a problem with the schema.org use, which isn't
> the examples use Person. Person doesn't exist in the full schema list,
> so I'm guessing that this was done in error. If I were you, I would wrap
Lawrence Woodman
> I'm not quite sure I understand what you're saying about Person. All
> the people are surrounded by things like<... itemprop="director"
> itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/People"> then<span
> itemprop="name"> like on the http://schema.org/Movie example.
If you go to http://schema.org/People it doesn't exist and the
only reference to it is in examples, but nowhere is it defined.
Instead of this:
<span itemprop="director" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/People">
<span itemprop="name">Joe Blogs</span>
<span itemprop="name">John Doe</span>
</span>
I think you should have:
<span itemprop="director" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
<span itemprop="name">Joe Blogs</span>
</span>
<span itemprop="director" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
<span itemprop="name">John Doe</span>
</span>
http://schema.org/People would be inconsistent with the rest of the schemas,
since as far I have noticed there are no other schemas there just to
pluralize others.
I therefore think that it was probably in an earlier revision of the
definitions, that was
left in by accident in the example.
I hope that helped a little.
Scott
Unless there's an aggregate for Person?
On Jul 13, 12:05 am, Lawrence Woodman <lwood...@vlifesystems.com>
wrote:
> > the people are surrounded by things like<... itemprop="director"
> > itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/People"> then<span
> > itemprop="name"> like on thehttp://schema.org/Movieexample.
>
> What I'm saying is that I think the example on the site is wrong.
>
> Instead of this:
>
> <span itemprop="director" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/People">
> <span itemprop="name">Joe Blogs</span>
> <span itemprop="name">John Doe</span>
> </span>
>
> I think you should have:
>
> <span itemprop="director" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
> <span itemprop="name">Joe Blogs</span>
> </span>
>
> <span itemprop="director" itemscope itemtype="http://schema.org/Person">
> <span itemprop="name">John Doe</span>
> </span>
>