Let's see if Wikipedia / DBpedia covers this. Seems such fine detail
vocabulary could be imported from there rather than recreated.
> For example
>
> material safety data sheets
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_safety_data_sheet
ie. http://dbpedia.org/page/Material_safety_data_sheet
> translations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Translation
http://dbpedia.org/page/Translation (the activity/service/industry)
> 3d models
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_modeling ... again as activity, rather
than noun form.
ah, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_model redirects there.
> architectural plans
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Architectural_plan
http://dbpedia.org/page/Architectural_plan ...this one is in noun form
> algorithms
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm
> role playing game characters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Player_character
I'm not sure what value there is in the schema.org team reworking all
of these, rather than just providing high level classes (e.g.
http://schema.org/CreativeWork) and filling the rest out in-bulk from
the chaotic but self-managing Wikipedia.
cheers,
Dan