Continuous Integration builds

58 views
Skip to first unread message

Jason Zaugg

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 4:18:03 AM8/5/12
to sca...@googlegroups.com
We've setup CI builds for Scalaz again.

1. CloudBees: https://scalazproject.ci.cloudbees.com
- Builds Scalaz7 daily
- publishes snapshots to Sonatype OSS
- Account is linked to thescala...@gmail.com

2. Travis CI: http://travis-ci.org/#!/scalaz/scalaz/builds
- Builds every commit to all branches
- Emails you if you broke the build
- Account is linked to the scalaz user on GitHub

-jason

Tony Morris

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 4:27:02 AM8/5/12
to sca...@googlegroups.com
Awesome mate, thanks.
--
Tony Morris
http://tmorris.net/

Miles Sabin

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 4:58:21 AM8/5/12
to sca...@googlegroups.com

On 5 Aug 2012 09:18, "Jason Zaugg" <jza...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We've setup CI builds for Scalaz again.

Out of interest, why both CloudBees and Travis CI?

Cheers,

Miles

Jason Zaugg

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 5:08:41 AM8/5/12
to sca...@googlegroups.com
Travis CI has better GitHub integration, CloudBees lets me configure
credentials privately for the Sonatype upload.

-jason

John Nilsson

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 6:51:50 AM8/5/12
to sca...@googlegroups.com

If it's just the Web hook you need clodbees should work fine with the github plug-in for Jenkins.
Br
John

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scalaz" group.
To post to this group, send email to sca...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to scalaz+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/scalaz?hl=en.

Jason Zaugg

unread,
Aug 5, 2012, 7:34:50 AM8/5/12
to sca...@googlegroups.com
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 12:51 PM, John Nilsson <jo...@milsson.nu> wrote:
> If it's just the Web hook you need clodbees should work fine with the github
> plug-in for Jenkins.
> Br
> John

The pull request validation coming soon to Travis CI looks good.

http://about.travis-ci.org/blog/announcing-pull-request-support/

-jason
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages