Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion What is highest priority for Scala to succeed in corporate world (Should be in scala-debate?) ?

Received: by 10.180.3.5 with SMTP id 5mr325297wiy.4.1320881410037;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:10 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: scala-user@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.210.203 with SMTP id gl11ls2152924wbb.1.gmail; Wed, 09 Nov
 2011 15:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.165.17 with SMTP id d17mr82198wel.11.1320881404700;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.165.17 with SMTP id d17mr82197wel.11.1320881404673;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <fan...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wy0-f173.google.com (mail-wy0-f173.google.com [74.125.82.173])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fd1si3405680wbb.0.2011.11.09.15.30.04
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of fan...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.173;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of fan...@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=fan...@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-wy0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 22so2523661wyh.32
        for <scala-user@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=5zgAv3kcNxEiCnIaVemkAJLhcgUNgTRpktEv1UlNqC4=;
        b=Ay3d1aw8W6wc6bbrrjfc5fUDU/PPyQ5ulXMZbCEJ3oZOr0oLEy95nYgUCp8KBa6zck
         T1lWAVe4KQ1UIgwlVocQgegpANhvvYhiHZeq3ZG5YciAyCLvz5g+InGgcXSt7JgJL6w6
         ppjfJzvVrGEWR6oIbjGgC+d3hid91SCSj6sQI=
Received: by 10.216.71.205 with SMTP id r55mr5625421wed.73.1320881404385;
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <fan...@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.10.1] (cac94-8-82-245-26-200.fbx.proxad.net. [82.245.26.200])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l20sm7417050wbo.6.2011.11.09.15.30.02
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EBB0CF9.3060...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:30:01 +0100
From: Francois Armand <fan...@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.15
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: scala-user@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [scala-user] What is highest priority for Scala to succeed in
 corporate world (Should be in scala-debate?) ?
References: <9894118.223.1320529912870.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqpp12>
In-Reply-To: <9894118.223.1320529912870.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqpp12>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Le 05/11/2011 22:51, Ken McDonald a écrit :
[...]
> The question is simple: List, in descending order of priority, what you
> feel needs to be addressed/fixed/whatever for Scala to succeed in the
> corporate (and hence IMHO ultimately the "real") world.
>
> My list:
>
> 1. IDE Support. [...]
>
> 2. Documentation. [...]
>
> 3. A "Scala Cookbook". [...]
>


My shop list would be:

1. A compiler as fast as the java one. And a modular scala-lib. Yeah, I 
now...
2. An as powerful and great library to deals with immutable data 
structure modification as the collection one is for collection (lens, 
zipper, etc)
3. Being able to use Scala for scripting. Than implies 1 and a better 
starting time + something to include automagically dependencies, 
essentially. And it will be so good to show how cool and powerful Scala 
is in some little lines. I really would *love* to convert the sysadmin I 
work with to use it as possible replacement of perl or python (or bash), 
but for now, the lauching time are killing that possibility.

IDE support is reaching the point where Eclipse does not go in my way 
anymore and is of real help for boring things (imports, completion of 
long method names, formatting, things like that).

Documentation is OK, especially with so many books and blogs post online.

A "Scala Cookbook" could be intersting, but I would much more prefer a 
repository of Scala scripts, if they were usable for real.

Cheers,

-- 
Francois Armand
http://fanf42.blogspot.com