Hello, guys
Looks like I'm going to be too busy in the coming months, so I
wouldn't have a chance to participate in Tutorial group,
unfortunately.
Anyway, thanks for opportunity and good luck to you all in Scala
progress!
On Jul 8, 10:41 am, Martin Paulo <
martin.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We still need to nail down a time and what we are actually going to be
> doing!
>
> A brief summary of where we are so far:
> Gokul has offered to host us at Aconex, starting on the night of the 14th
> (thank you!)
> Neither Birger nor myself will be able to make it on that night :-( (in
> fact, I can't make every other Thursday either. And I can't make Tuesday's
> either.
>
> Our original idea was to take turns in presenting chapters from the book.
> But Andy has proposed that we actually try to use Scala to create stuff, and
> use the time to work together/learn from each other.
> I think Andy's proposal is a great one.
>
> Perhaps we could borrow from Philip Greenspun's comments about his
> course<
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/philg/2007/08/23/improving-undergraduate...>,
>
> - *Students organized themselves into teams of 2 (ideal) or 3
> (acceptable) and are connected with a real-world client.*
> - *Lecture time is devoted to teams presenting either designs or
> prototypes and the other teams criticizing. This prepares students to
> participate in engineering design reviews...*
> - *Occasionally we will use the meeting time for teams to work together
> (sometimes paired with another team) on a data modeling challenge. This
> works great in rooms with a lot of blackboards and after 20 minutes we start
> asking teams to present their work while others criticize and comment.*
> - *Most evaluation is done by the clients (usually non-technical),
> professional interface designers whom I bring in, and professional software
> engineers whom I bring in as mentors and critics. The final presentation
> and write-up is evaluated by a team of business executives and venture
> capitalists; students are told to pitch the project as though they were
> seeking follow-on funding.*