Hi all, As you may have noticed in the past year or so, activity has decreased on scala-sips. While

There's no rush from our side, so take your time. Thanks to you! Cheers, - Jorge On Thu, Nov 17,

This discussion has been moved to: https://dev.scala-lang.org/t/sip-simplified-voting-acceptance-

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Hanns Holger Rutz <con...@sciss.de> wrote: Well, you are

It's overridden in IndexedSeqOptimized. IndexedSeq generally does not guarantee fast random

Hello everyone, I've just given my feedback to Eugene here. Have a nice day! Best, Jorge Vicente

Hello everyone, The new SIP process will be presented this Wednesday, 13th July. We'll discuss it

These links are dead. Any chance to find those somewhere else? On Monday, April 2, 2012 at 1:20:58 AM

Maybe interesting if some one can recheck this old SIP and perhaps borrow something from it.

Thank you for your kind words, Nils and Adriaan! I heard people say that if one looks at his old code

+1. For eeexamle, It can be very useful for fluent builder interfaces for exclude called methods

Dear Scalars, I've been working on and off the past years collecting feedback from scala.

Since you have a bijection between Day values and Int values BitSet is much more compact. On Sun, Sep

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/17/2014 09:59 PM, Hanns Holger Rutz wrote: >

I'd forgotten that interpolator ids had been upgraded already: https://issues.scala-lang.org/

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski <grzegorz.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> why “_” is not a valid type name it's reserved for Nil match { case _: List[_] => "

spore(val h = helper, ...) { ... } Would be a nicer syntax than what is posposed. Also you are

Hi, There has been some discussion on palladium-internals (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/palladium-

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:24 AM, Nicolas Passerini <npass...@gmail.com> wrote: Reading the

Hi Ben, i think an easier solution is to move the default implementations into DefaultPromise

I think you guys might be interested in taking a look at [<CustomOperation>] operations in F#

Hi, Please have a look at https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/3018 for the implementation of the

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 1:00 AM, √iktor Ҡlang <viktor...@gmail.com> wrote: So what happens

I think there was consensus in removing it. Or did I miss something? I've got a couple of

Hi all, I was wondering if anybody had given this any more consideration as a SIP? On Wednesday, 10

Excellent! thanks Alex!

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Daniel Sobral <dcso...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd rather

On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 8:07 PM, √iktor Ҡlang <viktor...@gmail.com> wrote: The problem

On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Bjorn Regnell <bjorn....@cs.lth.se> wrote: > ** Power