I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! (And our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does happen to move to a different day, I may still turn up. Grant
To: scala-leeds@googlegroups.com From: scala-leeds@googlegroups.com Subject: [scala-leeds] Digest for scala-leeds@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:27:16 +0000
On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! (And our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does happen to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on it, but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so perhaps we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative none the less.
Daniel
On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell <mattrussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Grant,
> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of day around in the future according to who can make what...
> -- Matt
> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! (And our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does happen to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
> That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on it, > but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily > because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city > centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so perhaps > we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
> -- Matt
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Daniel Drozdzewski <daniel.drozdzew...@gmail.com> > Date: 6 February 2012 12:54 > Subject: Re: [scala-leeds] Digest for scala...@googlegroups.com - 1 Message > in 1 Topic > To: mattrussel...@gmail.com
> The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative > none the less.
> Daniel
> On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell <mattrussel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Grant,
>> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of >> day around in the future according to who can make what...
>> -- Matt
>> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
>>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I >>> haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! (And >>> our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does happen >>> to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
> I could change the options for time to 'Lunchtime' and 'Evening' if > that's what you guys prefer.
> (Please do not vote yet)
> Daniel
> On 6 February 2012 13:06, Matt Russell <mattrussel...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Dan,
>> That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on it, >> but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily >> because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city >> centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so perhaps >> we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
>> -- Matt
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Daniel Drozdzewski <daniel.drozdzew...@gmail.com> >> Date: 6 February 2012 12:54 >> Subject: Re: [scala-leeds] Digest for scala...@googlegroups.com - 1 Message >> in 1 Topic >> To: mattrussel...@gmail.com
>> The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative >> none the less.
>> Daniel
>> On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell <mattrussel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Grant,
>>> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of >>> day around in the future according to who can make what...
>>> -- Matt
>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
>>>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I >>>> haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! (And >>>> our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does happen >>>> to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
Could I perhaps trouble you to do a slightly more involved one? ;-)
* Are you interested in meeting up for lunch and/or an evening? * Days available for lunchtime? * Days available for evening? * Interested in a coding dojo, presentations, chit-chat, all of the above?
On Monday, February 6, 2012 1:11:39 PM UTC, Daniel Drozdzewski wrote:
> Matt,
> I could change the options for time to 'Lunchtime' and 'Evening' if > that's what you guys prefer.
> (Please do not vote yet)
> Daniel
> On 6 February 2012 13:06, Matt Russell wrote: > > Hi Dan,
> > That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on > it, > > but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily > > because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city > > centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so perhaps > > we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
> > -- Matt
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Daniel Drozdzewski > > Date: 6 February 2012 12:54 > > Subject: Re: [scala-leeds] Digest for scala...@googlegroups.com - 1 > Message > > in 1 Topic
> > The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative > > none the less.
> > Daniel
> > On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell wrote: > >> Hi Grant,
> >> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of > >> day around in the future according to who can make what...
> >> -- Matt
> >> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
> >>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I > >>> haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! > (And > >>> our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does > happen > >>> to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
> Could I perhaps trouble you to do a slightly more involved one? ;-)
> * Are you interested in meeting up for lunch and/or an evening? > * Days available for lunchtime? > * Days available for evening? > * Interested in a coding dojo, presentations, chit-chat, all of the above?
> -- Matt
> On Monday, February 6, 2012 1:11:39 PM UTC, Daniel Drozdzewski wrote:
>> Matt,
>> I could change the options for time to 'Lunchtime' and 'Evening' if >> that's what you guys prefer.
>> (Please do not vote yet)
>> Daniel
>> On 6 February 2012 13:06, Matt Russell wrote: >> > Hi Dan,
>> > That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on >> > it, >> > but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily >> > because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city >> > centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so >> > perhaps >> > we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
>> > -- Matt
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Daniel Drozdzewski >> > Date: 6 February 2012 12:54 >> > Subject: Re: [scala-leeds] Digest for scala...@googlegroups.com - 1 >> > Message >> > in 1 Topic
>> > The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative >> > none the less.
>> > Daniel
>> > On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell wrote: >> >> Hi Grant,
>> >> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of >> >> day around in the future according to who can make what...
>> >> -- Matt
>> >> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
>> >>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I >> >>> haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! >> >>> (And >> >>> our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does >> >>> happen >> >>> to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
> Could I perhaps trouble you to do a slightly more involved one? ;-)
> * Are you interested in meeting up for lunch and/or an evening? > * Days available for lunchtime? > * Days available for evening? > * Interested in a coding dojo, presentations, chit-chat, all of the above?
> -- Matt
> On Monday, February 6, 2012 1:11:39 PM UTC, Daniel Drozdzewski wrote:
>> Matt,
>> I could change the options for time to 'Lunchtime' and 'Evening' if >> that's what you guys prefer.
>> (Please do not vote yet)
>> Daniel
>> On 6 February 2012 13:06, Matt Russell wrote: >> > Hi Dan,
>> > That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on >> > it, >> > but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily >> > because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city >> > centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so >> > perhaps >> > we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
>> > -- Matt
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Daniel Drozdzewski >> > Date: 6 February 2012 12:54 >> > Subject: Re: [scala-leeds] Digest for scala...@googlegroups.com - 1 >> > Message >> > in 1 Topic
>> > The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative >> > none the less.
>> > Daniel
>> > On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell wrote: >> >> Hi Grant,
>> >> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of >> >> day around in the future according to who can make what...
>> >> -- Matt
>> >> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
>> >>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I >> >>> haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations! >> >>> (And >> >>> our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does >> >>> happen >> >>> to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
> On 6 February 2012 13:20, Matt Russell <mattrussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> > Could I perhaps trouble you to do a slightly more involved one? ;-)
> > * Are you interested in meeting up for lunch and/or an evening?
> > * Days available for lunchtime?
> > * Days available for evening?
> > * Interested in a coding dojo, presentations, chit-chat, all of the above?
> > -- Matt
> > On Monday, February 6, 2012 1:11:39 PM UTC, Daniel Drozdzewski wrote:
> >> Matt,
> >> I could change the options for time to 'Lunchtime' and 'Evening' if
> >> that's what you guys prefer.
> >> (Please do not vote yet)
> >> Daniel
> >> On 6 February 2012 13:06, Matt Russell wrote:
> >> > Hi Dan,
> >> > That's a very sensible suggestion! Your survey has only evening times on
> >> > it,
> >> > but we'd been thinking initially of meeting up at lunchtimes, primarily
> >> > because it's very convenient for a bunch of us who work in Leeds city
> >> > centre. (Obviously, it's less convenient for people elsewhere, so
> >> > perhaps
> >> > we'd want to also do evening things if enough people were interested.)
> >> > The result of the survey should not be seen as binding, but indicative
> >> > none the less.
> >> > Daniel
> >> > On 6 February 2012 12:25, Matt Russell wrote:
> >> >> Hi Grant,
> >> >> Shame, it'd be cool to have you along! We may well juggle the choice of
> >> >> day around in the future according to who can make what...
> >> >> -- Matt
> >> >> On Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:27:28 AM UTC, Grant Crofton wrote:
> >> >>> I can't do Thursdays, but I wouldn't let that change your plans as I
> >> >>> haven't actually written any Scala since my initial investigations!
> >> >>> (And
> >> >>> our client seems to be moving away from it now). Although if it does
> >> >>> happen
> >> >>> to move to a different day, I may still turn up.
