The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Miles Sabin <mi...@milessabin.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:00:56 +0100
Local: Thurs, Jun 28 2012 4:00 am
Subject: Re: [scala-internals] HasRepr vs. (IsTraversableOnce, IsTraversableLike)
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Josh Suereth <joshua.suer...@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks good to me. I'd avoided the use of a dependent method type (ie.
> https://github.com/scala/scala/pull/792 > I decided to clean up the collection extension method mechanism so that it:
> Had less sprawl
> Just wanted to grab some folks attention/opinions (especially Miles) on that
the result type of fr.A) to allow for 2.9.x compatibility and because it's maybe not a completely familiar idiom to expect collections extensions writers to use. But if it's OK on both those counts then I think it improves things on balance. Cheers,
Miles
-- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||