Received: by 10.204.120.130 with SMTP id d2mr130460bkr.1.1279894283013;
        Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: scala-ide-dev@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.137.193 with SMTP id x1ls354104bkt.0.p; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 
	07:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.80.167 with SMTP id t39mr126644bkk.23.1279894280449;
        Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.80.167 with SMTP id t39mr126643bkk.23.1279894280396;
        Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <mi...@milessabin.com>
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id n18si165262bkw.2.2010.07.23.07.11.20;
        Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mi...@milessabin.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.44;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of mi...@milessabin.com designates 209.85.214.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=mi...@milessabin.com
Received: by mail-bw0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 7so1732838bwz.3
        for <scala-ide-dev@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.65.136 with SMTP id j8mr2648298bki.71.1279894279821; Fri, 
	23 Jul 2010 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.99.210 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5ecd31a9-9a5f-4879-ae80-76a8f7af999c@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <AANLkTikIsb4isoLZJui16-ihW9lspiGtGhS-UW5kH9pk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikdTr8_P1jeOjXGK7yP5-fflbunO7dUoI7EqtZF@mail.gmail.com>
	<cdadf04d-31fe-4811-a301-df3f7cad5a0e@w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com>
	<AANLkTimu0svw7fHihZK5xwpeqxdHiw7zun7SvqsL1bY0@mail.gmail.com>
	<5ecd31a9-9a5f-4879-ae80-76a8f7af999c@y11g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 15:11:19 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=9gbuvmunNVOBnxR3X6E8x=7FpmCm_2PhLZB74@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [scala-ide-dev] Re: way for scala-ide UI part implementations
From: Miles Sabin <mi...@milessabin.com>
To: scala-ide-dev@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:59 PM, adrians <nman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, that's what I meant, and what Andrew believes as well. He's the
> author of JDT Weaving, and one of the authors of AJDT (which uses
> AspectJ to extend the JDT similarly to the way you do, I believe) so I
> would think his point of view is worth something. If you read through
> the blog posting, you'll see what he meant.

I agree with Andrew that Object Teams would be interesting to explore,
but I also agree with him (unsurprisingly, seeing as we initiated the
project together at EclipseCon this year) that working with the JDT
team to provide better support for alternative JVM languages is the
way forward.

In the meantime, I don't see that Object Teams offers enough over
AspectJ to justify switching ... but feel free to try and persuade me
otherwise :-)

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin
tel: +44 7813 944 528
gtalk: mi...@milessabin.com
skype: milessabin
http://www.chuusai.com/
http://twitter.com/milessabin