Downloaded latest binary dist. (1.0.23) to: /Users/tmck/lisp/SBCL/
Run check by: $ sh run-sbcl.sh (running SBCL from: .) run-sbcl.sh: line 35: 489 Bus error SBCL_HOME="$BASE"/contrib "$BASE"/src/runtime/sbcl --core "$BASE"/output/sbcl.core "$@"
I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.11, Intel Core 2 Duo. I don't have admin priveleges, so I'm trying to run it in my home directory first.
Anything I've missed?
Regards, Timbo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
work for me on 10.5.5 using run-sbcl.sh. I can try on a 10.4 box later today.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
> work for me on 10.5.5 using run-sbcl.sh. I can try on a 10.4 box > later today.
Several users have reported trouble running binaries built under Leopard on Tiger systems. I no longer have any 10.4 machines, so I'd appreciate any clues you could find. -- Brian Mastenbrook br...@mastenbrook.net http://brian.mastenbrook.net/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Brian Mastenbrook
<br...@mastenbrook.net> wrote: > Several users have reported trouble running binaries built under Leopard on > Tiger systems.
Right, but I wasn't aware of any issues post 1.0.21.12.
> I no longer have any 10.4 machines, so I'd appreciate any > clues you could find.
Will do. If nothing else, I can at least provide a 10.4 compatible binary.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
<nikode...@random-state.net> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Tim McKeaveney <macoovac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Downloaded latest binary dist. (1.0.23) to: >> /Users/tmck/lisp/SBCL/
>> Run check by: >> $ sh run-sbcl.sh >> (running SBCL from: .) >> run-sbcl.sh: line 35: 489 Bus error >> SBCL_HOME="$BASE"/contrib "$BASE"/src/runtime/sbcl --core >> "$BASE"/output/sbcl.core "$@"
>> I'm running Mac OS X 10.4.11, Intel Core 2 Duo.
> work for me on 10.5.5 using run-sbcl.sh. I can try on a 10.4 box later today.
I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a 10.4 box.
-Nathan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@gmail.com> wrote: > I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a 10.4 box.
GDB says:
(gdb) handle SIGUSR1 pass nostop Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description SIGUSR1 No Yes Yes User defined signal 1 (gdb) run The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y Starting program: /Users/froydnj/testing/sbcl-1.0.23-x86-darwin/src/runtime/sbcl --core output/sbcl.core
Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1.
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000 0x9010c802 in _malloc_initialize () (gdb) where #0 0x9010c802 in _malloc_initialize () #1 0x900028d7 in malloc () #2 0x000097a8 in successful_malloc () #3 0x000097db in copied_string () #4 0x0000c75e in os_get_runtime_executable_path () #5 0x000099c4 in main () (gdb)
-Nathan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
> The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to LINKFLAGS as well.
Yes, that works much better.
-Nathan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola > <nikode...@random-state.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a 10.4 box.
>> The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to LINKFLAGS as well.
> Yes, that works much better.
Committed as 1.0.23.47.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:45 AM, Nikodemus Siivola >> <nikode...@random-state.net> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Nathan Froyd <froy...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:
>>>> I can confirm that the 1.0.23 binary packages fall over on a 10.4 >>>> box.
>>> The difference is putting the -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 to >>> LINKFLAGS as well.
>> Yes, that works much better.
Thanks Nikodemus! Somehow I did not realize that what was in CFLAGS wasn't passed to the linker, and thought it was working because I did not see any more _open$UNIX2003 symbols in the output from nm. -- Brian Mastenbrook br...@mastenbrook.net http://brian.mastenbrook.net/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitm... _______________________________________________ Sbcl-devel mailing list Sbcl-de...@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sbcl-devel