current stable django/satchmo

5 views
Skip to first unread message

ben.d...@googlemail.com

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 5:04:52 AM8/30/08
to Satchmo users
Hi, Please could someone advise the django / satchmo versions which
are stable together. Many thanks, Ben

Erik Allik

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 7:37:41 AM8/30/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
I think this questions comes up often. I was thinking that maybe this
information could always be available from the satchmo web site? Right
now I always have to ask.

Erik

faither.wzy

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 10:56:09 AM8/30/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
 
 
 
 The latest django and latest satchmo can't match。
 
 
 you can get them from  http://www.satchmoproject.com/snapshots/
 
 
 
2008-08-30

faither.wzy

发件人: Erik Allik
发送时间: 2008-08-30  19:37:49
抄送:
主题: Re: current stable django/satchmo

Ben Eliott

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 1:56:36 PM8/30/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
Thank you very much for that.
I guess it's obvious once you see the snapshot folder with satchmo/django inside. I agree with Eric, the website could do with a pointer to the latest snapshot as the recommended install.

Michael

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 8:04:39 PM8/30/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
django-trunk-8130 and satchmo-trunk-1363 have some problems too ( do
not remeber exactly - but something to do wth cuastom product...)

satchmo 0.7 works wery well with django rev7519


2008/8/31 faither.wzy <faith...@gmail.com>:

--
--
Michael

Chris Moffitt

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 12:27:52 PM8/31/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
With the changes Bruce just checked in, you should be able to run Satchmo-trunk (rev 1469 or higher) with Django trunk (rev 8761 or higher). Please note the Backwards incompatible changes here -
http://www.satchmoproject.com/trac/wiki/BackwardsIncompatibleChangesAfter0.7

With these changes, we should be done with the last of the major incompatibility changes between Django and Satchmo. Thanks for your patience as we've worked through this!

Our intent going forward is that Satchmo will be based on Django 1.x series and we'll strive to stick with a major milestone instead of some of the recent craziness we've experienced.

-Chris

kevin

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 2:16:34 PM8/31/08
to Satchmo users
Thanks a ton to all you guys for the effort during this time ( and
prior ).

On Aug 31, 12:27 pm, "Chris Moffitt" <ch...@moffitts.net> wrote:
> With the changes Bruce just checked in, you should be able to run
> Satchmo-trunk (rev 1469 or higher) with Django trunk (rev 8761 or higher).
> Please note the Backwards incompatible changes here -http://www.satchmoproject.com/trac/wiki/BackwardsIncompatibleChangesA...

Ben Eliott

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 1:46:14 PM9/1/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for all the suggestions re stable django/satchmo. I appreciate
there's a lot going on in the move into Django 1.0 making life
difficult for the current versions.

I've been trying to update a site which had some stability issues, but
various things going wrong so now just want to get it stable in 0.7.
So i'm trying to get 0.7 working with -r 7519 and getting back the
following when trying syncdb. I'm feeling pretty stupid about this
whole thing, but any suggestions welcome, thank you!:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "manage.py", line 11, in ?
execute_manager(settings)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/management/
__init__.py", line 272, in execute_manager
utility.execute()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/management/
__init__.py", line 219, in execute
self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py", line 72, in run_from_argv
self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/core/management/
base.py", line 81, in execute
translation.activate('en-us')
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/utils/translation/
__init__.py", line 73, in activate
return real_activate(language)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/utils/translation/
__init__.py", line 43, in delayed_loader
return g['real_%s' % caller](*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/utils/translation/
trans_real.py", line 211, in activate
_active[currentThread()] = translation(language)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/utils/translation/
trans_real.py", line 200, in translation
default_translation = _fetch(settings.LANGUAGE_CODE)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/django/utils/translation/
trans_real.py", line 183, in _fetch
app = getattr(__import__(appname[:p], {}, {}, [appname[p+1:]]),
appname[p+1:])
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/satchmo/configuration/
__init__.py", line 13, in ?
from values import *
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/satchmo/configuration/
values.py", line 323, in ?
class BooleanValue(Value):
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/satchmo/configuration/
values.py", line 325, in BooleanValue
class field(forms.BooleanField):
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'BooleanField'

Michael

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 4:55:57 AM9/2/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
Hi , are you sure you using -r7519?

you can try with:
export PYTHONPATH=/path_to/django_7519/:../:/path_to/satchmoprojects

is it empty db?
did you run "python manage.py satchmo_check"?


2008/9/2 Ben Eliott <ben.d...@googlemail.com>:

--
--
Michael

Ben Eliott

unread,
Sep 3, 2008, 7:54:39 AM9/3/08
to satchm...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the posts to help get this 0.7 installation stable. I re-
installed satchmo and django -r 7519, I think Michael was probably
right there, one of them must have been wrong, and made a few more
tweaks and the site's up and running again.
Thanks a lot for everyone's advice, much appreciated.
Ben
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages