On Sep 14, 2009, at 15:41 , Peter Chester wrote:
> I talked with Manthry a while ago [power outlets, etc]
And Peter it appears you are correct. For those of you who didn't wade
through the sometimes nasty and often hilarious thread of comments,
Manthri posts his own comments part way through:
QUOTE:
I think the interest in this subject speaks to the popularity of both
our coffeehouses and free wireless connectivity. It's worth exploring
the proposition that "the Commons" referenced in this article, rather
than being WiFi bandwidth, availability of power outlets or seating,
is infact the coffeehouse as a community space. Our perspective after
doing this a quarter-century, is that we operate coffeehouses with a
view to creating a space for community to gather. We have only
accidentally become a "WiFi cafe", by virtue of the fact that we
haven't done anything to dispel the notion that we are. Now that we
are doing so, it is understandable that some of our clients are
surprised and upset. For this, I apologize.
Internet use results in a disconnect between the user and ones'
physical surroundings, similar to watching television. No moral
judgement here. I do it too. In a coffeehouse however, this results in
rooms full of solitary people with no connection to the space or the
people around them and has the unfortunate effect of crowding out any
other sort of activity. Which of course is how we come to the
misconception that we are a "WiFi cafe".
While we have always endeavoured to make ourselves available to as
wide a group of people as possible (I'll admit that the folks who
bring up our strict policies about outside food and drink and general
decorum are largely correct. We're sticklers for that stuff, and I'm
always baffled when someone doesn't understand that they shouldn't
bring food and drink to a restaurant), we have also come to the
realization that the use of our space, "the Commons" if you will, is
something of a zero-sum proposition. We can either have rooms full of
laptop users or rooms half-full of folks having a cup of coffee with a
friend. Not both.
We have chosen to return to our roots as a coffeehouse where folks can
come to converse with friends, read books, hold meetings and religious
studys, listen to live music and generally have an experience that
transcends Explorer or - if you're a bit more savvy - Firefox. We
regretfully realize that this means that people who "must" have
Internet access will be unable to use our space, at least for now,
unless they bring in wireless cards or tethering capability. Of
course, on the flip side, it's been nice to see a new clientele who
want something different from a coffeehouse.
Moving beyond the personal issues that manifest themselves in a forum
such as this, I'd like to thank those readers who are offering
constructive solutions to our quandry. I think we've covered most of
that ground over the past 15 years, but we'll continue to revisit it
to see if better solutions present themselves down the road. As things
stand, we're going to leave the WiFi intact downtown and remove all
the power outlets, for obvious reasons. We need to move on from this
right now, however. I'm sure there are ways for us to solve everyone's
connectivity issues, but this really is not our charter. There are
many things we could do to make money. Selling umbrellas and offering/
charging for WiFi access are two of them. We're in neither business.
We're old-style coffeehouse operators who came to this pass by
accident. We were pioneers in offering WiFi when hardly anyone knew
what it was, and we will be pioneers in moving beyond it. We're
comfortable in that space. It's largely been why we operate the
busiest cafes in town.
Regarding WiFi access, as many readers have pointed out, every other
cafe offers it. Getting connected should be easy for anyone whose
purchasing decision is predicated on this, and we respect that.
As for us, we'll add beer and wine, better food selections, and
continue to improve our products and services till we get it right,
and till we rebuild our business to suit our long-term objectives.
That's a better future for us.
Thanks for your time.
END QUOTE.
--
Alan Hawrylyshen
a l a n a t p o l y p h a s e d o t c a