sage-5.1.beta5 released
131 views
Skip to first unread message
Jeroen Demeyer
Jun 19, 2012, 8:49:54 AM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
Source archive:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1.beta5.tar
Upgrade path:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1.beta5/
The source and upgrade path can also be found on the mirror network
(you might need to wait a while before the mirrors are synchronized):
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Please build, test, and report! We'd love to hear about your
experiences with this release.
== Tickets ==
* We closed 175 tickets in this release. For details, see
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/tickets.html
Merged in sage-5.1.beta5:
#4735: Mike Hansen, Karl-Dieter Crisman: Make e^A for A a generic matrix
work [Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman, Mike Hansen]
#8659: Burcin Erocal: another broken square root simplification
[Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman, Mike Hansen]
#8969: Douglas McNeil: problems with maxima inequalities [Reviewed by
Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#9260: Karl-Dieter Crisman: missing pointer in documentation [Reviewed
by Keshav Kini]
#10617: Sebastian Pancratz: Make polynomial over ZZ call FLINT for
composition and evaluation [Reviewed by Tom Boothby, Mike Hansen]
#10795: Rob Beezer: Fix and upgrade double dense matrix QR decomposition
[Reviewed by Martin Raum, Dan Drake]
#11274: Rob Beezer: Cholesky matrix decomposition breaks over the
rationals [Reviewed by Dan Drake]
#11775: Punarbasu Purkayastha: Make pretty_print take multiple arguments
[Reviewed by Keshav Kini, William Stein]
#11793: John Palmieri, Mike Hansen: autogenerate doc directories in
sage-maketest [Reviewed by Mike Hansen, John Palmieri]
#11998: Douglas McNeil: Duplicate legends when plotting partial function
with detect_poles=True [Reviewed by Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12088: Andrey Novoseltsev, Volker Braun: Make use of PALP for different
dimensions [Reviewed by Volker Braun, Andrey Novoseltsev]
#12293: Douglas McNeil: Graph(n) is not documented [Reviewed by Dan Drake]
#12605: Karl-Dieter Crisman: Change the default color of circle and
ellipses, etc. back to be the same shade of blue as for all other
graphics objects [Reviewed by William Stein]
#12688: Rob Beezer: Improve documentation of span method [Reviewed by
Andrey Novoseltsev]
#12693: Douglas McNeil: bug in jordan_form(transformation=true) for
integer matrices [Reviewed by Rob Beezer]
#12746: Mike Hansen: Another coercion problem with QQbar [Reviewed by
Robert Bradshaw]
#12810: Nathann Cohen: Broken links in the documentation of graph/ files
[Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12862: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: The partition function under FreeBSD
[Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
#12884: John Perry: Fix problems introduced by remove_constraint
functionality in MIP [Reviewed by Nathann Cohen]
#12904: André Apitzsch: colors from rainbow don't work in 3d plots
[Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12933: Nathann Cohen: Speedup in
DiGraph.stronly_connected_components_digraph [Reviewed by David Coudert]
#12968: Mike Hansen: round of symbolic expression (precision issue due
to RR) [Reviewed by Burcin Erocal, Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12982: Nathann Cohen: McGeeGraph, Tutte12Cage, TutteCoxeterGraph,
WagnerGraph [Reviewed by Keshav Kini]
#12993: Darij Grinberg, Anne Schilling: Bug in computing the rank
function a poset [Reviewed by Christian Stump, Franco Saliola]
#13005: R. Andrew Ohana: "maximum recursion depth exceeded" when doing
change_ring(RR) on an elliptic curve [Reviewed by William Stein]
#13011: William Stein: several optional tests fail in the
sage/mathematica interface with mathematica 8.0 [Reviewed by Mike
Hansen, Volker Braun]
#13012: Andrey Novoseltsev: MatrixSpace is too eager to construct zero
matrices [Reviewed by William Stein]
#13019: Nathann Cohen: longest_path broken for digraphs [Reviewed by
Mike Hansen]
#13045: Rob Beezer: Deprecate cholesky_decomposition() in favor of
cholesky() [Reviewed by Dan Drake]
#13057: John Palmieri: introspection is slow and causes a significant
memory leak [Reviewed by Keshav Kini]
#13091: Jason Grout: Bug in graph tensor_product [Reviewed by David Coudert]
#13105: William Stein: fix some copyright headers in c_lib [Reviewed by
Keshav Kini]
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
Source archive:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1.beta5.tar
Upgrade path:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1.beta5/
The source and upgrade path can also be found on the mirror network
(you might need to wait a while before the mirrors are synchronized):
http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
Please build, test, and report! We'd love to hear about your
experiences with this release.
== Tickets ==
* We closed 175 tickets in this release. For details, see
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/tickets.html
Merged in sage-5.1.beta5:
#4735: Mike Hansen, Karl-Dieter Crisman: Make e^A for A a generic matrix
work [Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman, Mike Hansen]
#8659: Burcin Erocal: another broken square root simplification
[Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman, Mike Hansen]
#8969: Douglas McNeil: problems with maxima inequalities [Reviewed by
Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#9260: Karl-Dieter Crisman: missing pointer in documentation [Reviewed
by Keshav Kini]
#10617: Sebastian Pancratz: Make polynomial over ZZ call FLINT for
composition and evaluation [Reviewed by Tom Boothby, Mike Hansen]
#10795: Rob Beezer: Fix and upgrade double dense matrix QR decomposition
[Reviewed by Martin Raum, Dan Drake]
#11274: Rob Beezer: Cholesky matrix decomposition breaks over the
rationals [Reviewed by Dan Drake]
#11775: Punarbasu Purkayastha: Make pretty_print take multiple arguments
[Reviewed by Keshav Kini, William Stein]
#11793: John Palmieri, Mike Hansen: autogenerate doc directories in
sage-maketest [Reviewed by Mike Hansen, John Palmieri]
#11998: Douglas McNeil: Duplicate legends when plotting partial function
with detect_poles=True [Reviewed by Keshav Kini, Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12088: Andrey Novoseltsev, Volker Braun: Make use of PALP for different
dimensions [Reviewed by Volker Braun, Andrey Novoseltsev]
#12293: Douglas McNeil: Graph(n) is not documented [Reviewed by Dan Drake]
#12605: Karl-Dieter Crisman: Change the default color of circle and
ellipses, etc. back to be the same shade of blue as for all other
graphics objects [Reviewed by William Stein]
#12688: Rob Beezer: Improve documentation of span method [Reviewed by
Andrey Novoseltsev]
#12693: Douglas McNeil: bug in jordan_form(transformation=true) for
integer matrices [Reviewed by Rob Beezer]
#12746: Mike Hansen: Another coercion problem with QQbar [Reviewed by
Robert Bradshaw]
#12810: Nathann Cohen: Broken links in the documentation of graph/ files
[Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12862: Stephen Montgomery-Smith: The partition function under FreeBSD
[Reviewed by Mike Hansen]
#12884: John Perry: Fix problems introduced by remove_constraint
functionality in MIP [Reviewed by Nathann Cohen]
#12904: André Apitzsch: colors from rainbow don't work in 3d plots
[Reviewed by Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12933: Nathann Cohen: Speedup in
DiGraph.stronly_connected_components_digraph [Reviewed by David Coudert]
#12968: Mike Hansen: round of symbolic expression (precision issue due
to RR) [Reviewed by Burcin Erocal, Karl-Dieter Crisman]
#12982: Nathann Cohen: McGeeGraph, Tutte12Cage, TutteCoxeterGraph,
WagnerGraph [Reviewed by Keshav Kini]
#12993: Darij Grinberg, Anne Schilling: Bug in computing the rank
function a poset [Reviewed by Christian Stump, Franco Saliola]
#13005: R. Andrew Ohana: "maximum recursion depth exceeded" when doing
change_ring(RR) on an elliptic curve [Reviewed by William Stein]
#13011: William Stein: several optional tests fail in the
sage/mathematica interface with mathematica 8.0 [Reviewed by Mike
Hansen, Volker Braun]
#13012: Andrey Novoseltsev: MatrixSpace is too eager to construct zero
matrices [Reviewed by William Stein]
#13019: Nathann Cohen: longest_path broken for digraphs [Reviewed by
Mike Hansen]
#13045: Rob Beezer: Deprecate cholesky_decomposition() in favor of
cholesky() [Reviewed by Dan Drake]
#13057: John Palmieri: introspection is slow and causes a significant
memory leak [Reviewed by Keshav Kini]
#13091: Jason Grout: Bug in graph tensor_product [Reviewed by David Coudert]
#13105: William Stein: fix some copyright headers in c_lib [Reviewed by
Keshav Kini]
Volker Braun
Jun 19, 2012, 8:55:34 AM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
I'm impressed at the speed of beta releases ;-)
Alexander Dreyer
Jun 19, 2012, 8:57:43 AM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Volker Braun schrieb:
;-)
My best,
Alexander
--
Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Math. Alexander Dreyer
Abteilung "Systemanalyse, Prognose und Regelung"
Fraunhofer Institut f�r Techno- und Wirtschaftsmathematik (ITWM)
Fraunhofer-Platz 1
67663 Kaiserslautern
Telefon +49 (0) 631-31600-4318
Fax +49 (0) 631-31600-1099
E-Mail alexande...@itwm.fraunhofer.de
Internet http://www.itwm.fraunhofer.de/sys/dreyer.html
> I'm impressed at the speed of beta releases ;-)
Indeed, thinking of sage-4.7.2.alpha3...
;-)
My best,
Alexander
--
Dr. rer. nat. Dipl.-Math. Alexander Dreyer
Abteilung "Systemanalyse, Prognose und Regelung"
Fraunhofer Institut f�r Techno- und Wirtschaftsmathematik (ITWM)
Fraunhofer-Platz 1
67663 Kaiserslautern
Telefon +49 (0) 631-31600-4318
Fax +49 (0) 631-31600-1099
E-Mail alexande...@itwm.fraunhofer.de
Internet http://www.itwm.fraunhofer.de/sys/dreyer.html
Marshall Hampton
Jun 19, 2012, 12:47:49 PM6/19/12
to sage-release
All (standard) tests passed on a machine with x86-64 linux (kernel
3.0.0-19, Intel i7-3930k, Kubuntu 11.10).
-Marshall
On Jun 19, 7:49 am, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
>
> Source archive:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1...
>
> Upgrade path:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1...
3.0.0-19, Intel i7-3930k, Kubuntu 11.10).
-Marshall
On Jun 19, 7:49 am, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
>
> Source archive:
>
>
> Upgrade path:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1...
>
> The source and upgrade path can also be found on the mirror network
> (you might need to wait a while before the mirrors are synchronized):
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> Please build, test, and report! We'd love to hear about your
> experiences with this release.
>
> == Tickets ==
>
> * We closed 175 tickets in this release. For details, see
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/tickets....
> The source and upgrade path can also be found on the mirror network
> (you might need to wait a while before the mirrors are synchronized):
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> Please build, test, and report! We'd love to hear about your
> experiences with this release.
>
> == Tickets ==
>
> * We closed 175 tickets in this release. For details, see
>
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 2:27:30 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
On both sage.math and OS X Lion (both of which build the gcc spkg), mpir fails self-tests the first time it's built (pre-gcc). Same failure on both platforms:
Test dwarf2_gen64_test: O +0-1/1 0%
** O: dwarf64_pathname did not match object file!
FAIL: modules/dbgfmts/dwarf2/tests/gen64/dwarf2_gen64_test.sh
I'm trying again, just testing mpir the second time through...
--
John
Jeroen Demeyer
Jun 19, 2012, 2:29:57 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On 2012-06-19 20:27, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
>
>
> On both sage.math and OS X Lion (both of which build the gcc spkg), mpir
> fails self-tests the first time it's built (pre-gcc). Same failure on
> both platforms
This is a known bug in yasm.
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Dear Sage lovers,
>
> We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
>
>
> On both sage.math and OS X Lion (both of which build the gcc spkg), mpir
> fails self-tests the first time it's built (pre-gcc). Same failure on
> both platforms
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 2:54:35 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Does this mean that '!mpir' should be added to the default value of SAGE_CHECK_PACKAGES?
--
John
Jeroen Demeyer
Jun 19, 2012, 2:57:26 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On 2012-06-19 20:54, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Does this mean that '!mpir' should be added to the default value of
> SAGE_CHECK_PACKAGES?
Maybe, but upgrading MPIR would also solve the problem.
> Does this mean that '!mpir' should be added to the default value of
> SAGE_CHECK_PACKAGES?
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 3:51:37 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Is there a ticket for upgrading MPIR? (I couldn't find one.) It should have, as a stopgap, adding '!mpir' to SAGE_CHECK_PACKAGES.
--
John
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 5:04:32 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
On OS X Lion with the latest Xcode, a doctest failure:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/palmieri/Desktop/Sage_stuff/sage_builds/clean/sage-5.1.beta5/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 2477:
sage: Q.round(6).zero_at(10^-6)
Expected:
[-0.458831 0.126051 -0.381212 -0.394574 -0.68744]
[-0.458831 -0.47269 0.051983 0.717294 -0.220963]
[ 0.229416 -0.661766 -0.661923 -0.180872 0.196411]
[ 0.688247 -0.189076 0.204468 0.09663 -0.662889]
[-0.229416 -0.535715 0.609939 -0.536422 0.024551]
Got:
[-0.458831 -0.126051 0.381212 -0.394574 -0.68744]
[-0.458831 0.47269 -0.051983 0.717294 -0.220963]
[ 0.229416 0.661766 0.661923 -0.180872 0.196411]
[ 0.688247 0.189076 -0.204468 0.09663 -0.662889]
[-0.229416 0.535715 -0.609939 -0.536422 0.024551]
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/palmieri/Desktop/Sage_stuff/sage_builds/clean/sage-5.1.beta5/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 2483:
sage: R.round(6).zero_at(10^-6)
Expected:
[ 4.358899 -0.458831 13.076697 6.194225 2.982405]
[ 0.0 -1.670172 -0.598741 1.29202 -6.207997]
[ 0.0 0.0 -5.444402 -5.468661 0.682716]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.027626 -3.6193]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.024551]
Got:
[ 4.358899 -0.458831 13.076697 6.194225 2.982405]
[ 0.0 1.670172 0.598741 -1.29202 6.207997]
[ 0.0 0.0 5.444402 5.468661 -0.682716]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.027626 -3.6193]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.024551]
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/palmieri/Desktop/Sage_stuff/sage_builds/clean/sage-5.1.beta5/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 2511:
sage: Q.round(6).zero_at(10^-6)
Expected:
[ -0.730297 0.207057 + 0.538347*I -0.246305 + 0.076446*I 0.238162 - 0.10366*I]
[ 0.091287 -0.207057 - 0.377878*I -0.378656 + 0.195222*I 0.701244 - 0.364371*I]
[ 0.63901 + 0.091287*I 0.170822 + 0.667758*I 0.034115 - 0.040902*I 0.314017 - 0.082519*I]
[ 0.182574 + 0.091287*I -0.036235 + 0.07247*I -0.863228 - 0.063228*I -0.449969 - 0.011612*I]
Got:
[ -0.730297 0.207057 + 0.538347*I 0.246305 - 0.076446*I 0.238162 - 0.10366*I]
[ 0.091287 -0.207057 - 0.377878*I 0.378656 - 0.195222*I 0.701244 - 0.364371*I]
[ 0.63901 + 0.091287*I 0.170822 + 0.667758*I -0.034115 + 0.040902*I 0.314017 - 0.082519*I]
[ 0.182574 + 0.091287*I -0.036235 + 0.07247*I 0.863228 + 0.063228*I -0.449969 - 0.011612*I]
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/palmieri/Desktop/Sage_stuff/sage_builds/clean/sage-5.1.beta5/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 2516:
sage: R.round(6).zero_at(10^-6)
Expected:
[ 10.954451 -1.917029*I 5.385938 - 2.19089*I -0.273861 - 2.19089*I]
[ 0.0 4.829596 -0.869638 - 5.864879*I 0.993872 - 0.305409*I]
[ 0.0 0.0 -12.001608 0.270953 - 0.442063*I]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.942964]
Got:
[ 10.954451 -1.917029*I 5.385938 - 2.19089*I -0.273861 - 2.19089*I]
[ 0.0 4.829596 -0.869638 - 5.864879*I 0.993872 - 0.305409*I]
[ 0.0 0.0 12.001608 -0.270953 + 0.442063*I]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.942964]
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/palmieri/Desktop/Sage_stuff/sage_builds/clean/sage-5.1.beta5/devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx", line 2548:
sage: R.round(6).zero_at(10^-6)
Expected:
[-5.567764 2.69408 -2.69408]
[ 0.0 -3.569585 3.569585]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0]
Got:
[ 5.567764 -2.69408 2.69408]
[ 0.0 3.569585 -3.569585]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0]
[ 0.0 0.0 0.0]
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
5 of 38 in __main__.example_33
***Test Failed*** 5 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file /Users/palmieri/.sage//tmp/matrix_double_dense_95699.py
[4.1 s]
Justin C. Walker
Jun 19, 2012, 7:56:46 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Jun 19, 2012, at 5:49 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
Source archive:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.1.beta5/sage-5.1.beta5.tar
Built w/o problems on two platforms: Mac OS X 10.6.8 (Dual 6-core Xeons) and 10.7.4 (Quad-core Core i7).
On 10.6.8, all tests passed.
On 10.7.4, one test failure:
The following tests failed:sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx # 5 doctests failed
The failure appears to be the same as JohnP reported.
In my case, the installed Xcode version is 4.3.2 (4E2002).
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
-----------
If it weren't for carbon-14, I wouldn't date at all.
-----------
Justin C. Walker
Jun 19, 2012, 7:57:53 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Jun 19, 2012, at 14:04 , John H Palmieri wrote:
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
On OS X Lion with the latest Xcode, a doctest failure:
Just checking: is this 10.7.4, with Xcode 4.3.3?
Thanks.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Director
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--------
"Weaseling out of things is what separates us from the animals.
Well, except the weasel."
- Homer J Simpson
--------
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 8:21:13 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 4:57:53 PM UTC-7, Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 14:04 , John H Palmieri wrote:
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
On OS X Lion with the latest Xcode, a doctest failure:Just checking: is this 10.7.4, with Xcode 4.3.3?
Yes, that's right. ("About Xcode" says "Xcode 4.3.3 (4E3002)")
--
John
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 11:00:18 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
On sage.math, built successfully. For whatever reason, the docbuild took a ridiculous amount of time: I noticed it was still going 3 hours after finishing compiling everything! So I hit ctrl-c, deleted the partial output from the docbuilding process, applied the patches from #6495, and built the docs in half an hour. (After #6495 it shouldn't even take this long, but maybe sage.math was heavily loaded, or the disk was being very slow, or something. I built in /scratch, which seems pretty slow, at least some of the time.) Then all tests passed.
--
John
John H Palmieri
Jun 19, 2012, 11:54:12 PM6/19/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Regarding time required to build the docs: if you set the environment variable SAGE_DOC_JSMATH to "yes", then the documentation builds much more quickly. That was one of the delays on sage.math: this variable was unset. When I set it, with the patches from #6495, docbuilding took about 7 minutes. For another illustration, on an OS X machine, it takes about 2 minutes to build the tutorial with SAGE_DOC_JSMATH unset, and it takes about 10 seconds with it set to "yes".
(By the way, when we switch to MathJax, this variable will still be recognized, as will a new variable SAGE_DOC_MATHJAX.)
Should we change the default in the Makefile to use jsMath to build the docs? It seems like a good idea to me.
--
John
Alex Ghitza
Jun 20, 2012, 2:05:04 AM6/20/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Hi,
Built fine on
[ghitza@igusa ~]$ uname -a
Linux igusa 3.3.8-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 5 15:20:32 CEST 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux
(Note: this is running Arch Linux.)
One long test failed in
devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/find_generators.py
I ran it with the verbose option and got (only the relevant part is listed):
Trying:
R = ModularFormsRing(Gamma0(Integer(3)))###line 751:_sage_ >>>
R = ModularFormsRing(Gamma0(3))
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(Integer(20))###line
752:_sage_ >>> R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(20)
Expecting:
[q - 8532*q^6 - 88442*q^7 + O(q^8), q^2 + 207*q^6 + 24516*q^7 +
O(q^8), q^3 + 456*q^6 + O(q^8), q^4 - 135*q^6 - 926*q^7 + O(q^8), q^5
+ 18*q^6 + 135*q^7 + O(q^8)]
ok
Trying:
A=R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(Integer(80),
prec=Integer(30))###line 759:_sage_ >>>
A=R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(80, prec=30)
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
B=R.modular_forms_of_weight(Integer(80)).cuspidal_submodule().q_expansion_basis(prec=Integer(30))
# long time (20s)###line 760:_sage_ >>>
B=R.modular_forms_of_weight(80).cuspidal_submodule().q_expansion_basis(prec=30)
# long time (20s)
Expecting nothing
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libcsage.so(print_backtrace+0x31)[0x7fbfca974207]
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libcsage.so(sigdie+0x14)[0x7fbfca974239]
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler+0x216)[0x7fbfca973e16]
/lib/libpthread.so.0(+0xf140)[0x7fbfcca9b140]
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libatlas.so(ATL_dJIK52x52x52TN52x52x0_a1_b0+0xac)[0x7fbfc125849c]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault occurred in Sage.
This probably occurred because a *compiled* component of Sage has a bug
in it and is not properly wrapped with sig_on(), sig_off(). You might
want to run Sage under gdb with 'sage -gdb' to debug this.
Sage will now terminate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The doctested process was killed by signal 11
[12.4 s]
As fate would have it, this is precisely one of the corners of the
Sage code base that I'm most interested in...
--
Best,
Alex
--
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
http://aghitza.org
Built fine on
[ghitza@igusa ~]$ uname -a
Linux igusa 3.3.8-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 5 15:20:32 CEST 2012
x86_64 GNU/Linux
(Note: this is running Arch Linux.)
One long test failed in
devel/sage/sage/modular/modform/find_generators.py
I ran it with the verbose option and got (only the relevant part is listed):
Trying:
R = ModularFormsRing(Gamma0(Integer(3)))###line 751:_sage_ >>>
R = ModularFormsRing(Gamma0(3))
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(Integer(20))###line
752:_sage_ >>> R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(20)
Expecting:
[q - 8532*q^6 - 88442*q^7 + O(q^8), q^2 + 207*q^6 + 24516*q^7 +
O(q^8), q^3 + 456*q^6 + O(q^8), q^4 - 135*q^6 - 926*q^7 + O(q^8), q^5
+ 18*q^6 + 135*q^7 + O(q^8)]
ok
Trying:
A=R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(Integer(80),
prec=Integer(30))###line 759:_sage_ >>>
A=R.cuspidal_submodule_q_expansion_basis(80, prec=30)
Expecting nothing
ok
Trying:
B=R.modular_forms_of_weight(Integer(80)).cuspidal_submodule().q_expansion_basis(prec=Integer(30))
# long time (20s)###line 760:_sage_ >>>
B=R.modular_forms_of_weight(80).cuspidal_submodule().q_expansion_basis(prec=30)
# long time (20s)
Expecting nothing
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libcsage.so(print_backtrace+0x31)[0x7fbfca974207]
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libcsage.so(sigdie+0x14)[0x7fbfca974239]
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libcsage.so(sage_signal_handler+0x216)[0x7fbfca973e16]
/lib/libpthread.so.0(+0xf140)[0x7fbfcca9b140]
/opt/sage-5.1.beta5/local/lib/libatlas.so(ATL_dJIK52x52x52TN52x52x0_a1_b0+0xac)[0x7fbfc125849c]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segmentation fault occurred in Sage.
This probably occurred because a *compiled* component of Sage has a bug
in it and is not properly wrapped with sig_on(), sig_off(). You might
want to run Sage under gdb with 'sage -gdb' to debug this.
Sage will now terminate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The doctested process was killed by signal 11
[12.4 s]
As fate would have it, this is precisely one of the corners of the
Sage code base that I'm most interested in...
--
Best,
Alex
--
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
http://aghitza.org
Jeroen Demeyer
Jun 20, 2012, 2:50:44 AM6/20/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
I created #13140 for this. This also highlights the need for OS X Lion
testing machines.
testing machines.
Rob Beezer
Jun 21, 2012, 12:56:35 PM6/21/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:04:32 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
On OS X Lion with the latest Xcode, a doctest failure:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx"
**********************************************************************
This looks to be the previously-seen problem on other RDF-matrix methods with non-unique (or non-predictable) eigenvectors from 1-dimensional eigenspaces. Normalizing the first entry of eigenvector to be positive should cure the problem, but the doctest won't be so pretty anymore.
Do we need to back out the offending #10795 or should a fix go up on the new #13140? Looks like the latter to me.
Thanks, John and Jeroen.
John H Palmieri
Jun 22, 2012, 12:01:18 PM6/22/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 5:49:54 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
Dear Sage lovers,
We're releasing Sage 5.1.beta5.
The scripts repository is not clean, I think due to mpir:
$ cd local/bin
$ hg status
? vsyasm
? yasm
? ytasm
--
John
John H Palmieri
Jun 22, 2012, 2:04:39 PM6/22/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Tim Joseph Dumol
Jun 23, 2012, 11:41:28 AM6/23/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
Built without problems on Arch Linux x64 (Linux timdumol-laptop-linux 3.4.3-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Jun 18 08:28:29 CEST 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux).
--
Tim Joseph Dumol
Had the following test failure:
**********************************************************************
File "/opt/sage/devel/sage/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 314:
sage: err
Expected:
''
Got:
'WARNING: Configuration file ipythonrc not found. Ignoring request.\n------------------------------------------------------------\nTraceback (most recent call last):\n File "/opt/sage/local/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/ConfigLoader.py", line 66, in load\n fname = filefind(fname,incpath)\n File "/opt/sage/local/lib/python/site-packages/IPython/genutils.py", line 554, in filefind\n \' not found in current or supplied directories:\' + `alt_dirs`\nIOError: File\'ipythonrc\' not found in current or supplied directories:u\'/home/timdumol/.ipython\'\n\nWARNING: Problems loading configuration file \'ipythonrc\'\nStarting with default -bare bones- configuration.\n'
**********************************************************************
Seems the warning needs to be suppressed/ignored in the test.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-r...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release?hl=en.
Tim Joseph Dumol
Volker Braun
Jun 23, 2012, 12:00:00 PM6/23/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com
I guess you have ipython-0.12 configuration files, but we ship only ipython-0.10 which is not compatible. This is all going to be changed in ipython-0.12, so its probably useless to track this down. But let us know if the issue persists once we update to ipython-0.12.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages