                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of john.crem...@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.176;
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of john.crem...@gmail.com designates 10.236.191.134 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.191.134;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9e6cf58e-e470-462d-ab7b-44239058d...@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
References: <4F45186B.9030...@cage.ugent.be>
	<3a9fd165-3ee2-44e0-ab2e-bebd8e0fe...@m24g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
	<4F46BE53.1000...@creativetrax.com>
	<4F46BED0.9010...@creativetrax.com>
	<4fcb6c3a-5fcb-4347-b21f-c6bfa3ee8...@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
	<4F46F389.6050...@creativetrax.com>
	<7a7bcf08-744c-4905-bf28-ca99d1625...@s9g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
	<bd25263a-0a9e-40a8-9d75-79bf30d33...@p12g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
	<9e6cf58e-e470-462d-ab7b-44239058d...@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:29:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD0p0K7-RqHcaeen8F4bFMzUAbk1AU3nTdD0t1QhUC6xjf4...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [sage-release] Re: sage-5.0.beta5 released
From: John Cremona <john.crem...@gmail.com>
To: sage-release@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Here's a test failure with beta5 which I don't think I have seen
before.  Build from scratch on 32-bit ubuntu, gcc 4.4.3.  Only
numerical fuzz but still...

john@john-laptop%./sage -t  --long -force_lib
"devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx"
sage -t --long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx"
**********************************************************************
File "/home/john/sage-5.0.beta5/devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx", line 8=
65:
    sage: m.baum_welch([-2,-1,.1,0.1])
Expected:
    (4.534646052182663, 7)
Got:
    (4.534646052182662, 7)
**********************************************************************
File "/home/john/sage-5.0.beta5/devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx", line 8=
67:
    sage: m.log_likelihood([-2,-1,.1,0.1])
Expected:
    4.534646052182663
Got:
    4.534646052182662
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
   2 of  21 in __main__.example_19
***Test Failed*** 2 failures.
For whitespace errors, see the file /home/john/.sage//tmp/chmm_19036.py
	 [2.7 s]

John

On 24 February 2012 22:05, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 24, 4:19=A0pm, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 24, 3:04=A0pm, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Jason, what's going on with
>>
>> > x,y =3D var('x,y')
>> > contour_plot(x^2+y^2-2,(x,-1,1), (y,-1,1))
>>
>> This was due tohttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12213, and
>> not fixed by #12222, because that only focused on shape primitives.
>>
>> I've openedhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12581as a
>> critical ticket, and am this close to making it a blocker.
>
> Needs review. =A0It works, but I would like people to make sure it
> doesn't break the summation aspect ratio handling, and comment on
> whether it should be 1 or 1.0.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups=
 "sage-release" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-release@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-release+unsubscribe@go=
oglegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage=
-release?hl=3Den.
>