Received: by 10.101.213.30 with SMTP id p30mr1021246anq.1.1281701929373;
        Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.185.34 with SMTP id m34ls772585anp.7.p; Fri, 13 Aug 2010
 05:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.94.18 with SMTP id r18mr154515anb.64.1281701927555; Fri,
 13 Aug 2010 05:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:18:47
 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 05:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <25f6a8ba-6680-4aea-afb2-01956d200fa2@w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 80.39.183.36
References: <4B8404A9.3020202@onetel.net> <D13D2CE0-B5C5-4338-8B44-7D794C7F066A@math.washington.edu>
 <AANLkTil6CZnKbZp8oWBlSkJIwKlEj2QFSctOsJv0-9tb@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimkGRr22l3L3WXHZGJyYFJ-MLUCayFrTsT1eHjM@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTikBy9mZq+HFOHbaL=_9opM_oPQ6LYTyygE=3HM+@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimJSbVNRZ5OH2w=vqAGvPwc4Fy-Wse2b8AY=ii=@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=gAZkzv8tffBJ+wiGz9KNzFcU6srAmzzzyEJ59@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTimOztuk7c0QUv-p25e+6zvfU29QpS9aeCuS5GX4@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTim-oBQjQ_5m1+GAcemxKkujJ-UzDBtnkCVK8EBC@mail.gmail.com>
 <i409mo$5jt$1@dough.gmane.org> <4C63B0F4.6070909@onetel.net> <25f6a8ba-6680-4aea-afb2-01956d200fa2@w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.4; Linux) KHTML/4.4.5
 (like Gecko),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <048ce8e5-e23b-438c-9e24-114b28ca9c7c@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Should there be some *good* examples on notebook?
From: mmarco <mma...@unizar.es>
To: sage-devel <sage-devel@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I think the current design fits perfectly for a classroom server, but
maybe its true that the public notebook server gets too much garbage.
The rating system should be a solution for this, but clearly, doesn't
work. Maybe just a regular garbage collecting could be usefull. But