Darwin parduc.home 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386
OS X 10.6.4
SAGE64=yes
SAGE_CHECK=yes
MacPorts installed, but removed from PATH while building sage (I hope this doesn't cause any problems, but it does make me a little nervous). I'm also worried that they may not work on 10.5/10.4.
I created the "normal" application with sage -bdist, as well as a different dmg with the new "experimental" SageMenu.app. The latter should be considered somewhat experimental (though much nicer IMHO). If you don't like it or it doesn't work, it's easy to get the sage folder out of it, so it won't be a wasted download. It would also be really great to get some feedback as to whether we are going down the right road with this application.
But here's the catch, I don't have a place that I feel comfortable hosting 2 files that are so big. Any ideas as to where I should put them?
-Ivan
Thanks!
> Darwin parduc.home 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386
>
> OS X 10.6.4
> SAGE64=yes
> SAGE_CHECK=yes
>
> MacPorts installed, but removed from PATH while building sage (I hope this doesn't cause any problems, but it does make me a little nervous). I'm also worried that they may not work on 10.5/10.4.
Hopefully #9208 and #9210 take care of the Macports issues. They solve
at least one Macports issue for me.
>
> I created the "normal" application with sage -bdist, as well as a different dmg with the new "experimental" SageMenu.app. The latter should be considered somewhat experimental (though much nicer IMHO). If you don't like it or it doesn't work, it's easy to get the sage folder out of it, so it won't be a wasted download. It would also be really great to get some feedback as to whether we are going down the right road with this application.
>
> But here's the catch, I don't have a place that I feel comfortable hosting 2 files that are so big. Any ideas as to where I should put them?
>
sage.math seems like an obvious place
Thanks,
Jason
No problem.
>> Darwin parduc.home 10.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 10.4.0: Fri Apr 23 18:28:53 PDT 2010; root:xnu-1504.7.4~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386
>>
>> OS X 10.6.4
>> SAGE64=yes
>> SAGE_CHECK=yes
>>
>> MacPorts installed, but removed from PATH while building sage (I hope this doesn't cause any problems, but it does make me a little nervous). I'm also worried that they may not work on 10.5/10.4.
>
> Hopefully #9208 and #9210 take care of the Macports issues. They solve at least one Macports issue for me.
Cool. I'll have to check them out.
>> I created the "normal" application with sage -bdist, as well as a different dmg with the new "experimental" SageMenu.app. The latter should be considered somewhat experimental (though much nicer IMHO). If you don't like it or it doesn't work, it's easy to get the sage folder out of it, so it won't be a wasted download. It would also be really great to get some feedback as to whether we are going down the right road with this application.
>>
>> But here's the catch, I don't have a place that I feel comfortable hosting 2 files that are so big. Any ideas as to where I should put them?
>>
>
> sage.math seems like an obvious place
Okay, I guess I'll have to figure out how to get an account.
-Ivan
sage-4.4.4-i386-Darwin.dmg
has the "old" application--the one that you can make with sage -bdist
sage-deluxe-4.4.4-i386-Darwin.dmg
has the "new" application--it should be nicer, but more experimental. Please read the README and give me any feedback you have.
I would have put them both on the same disk image if I could figure out a safe way to share SAGE_ROOT without duplicating the data.
-Ivan
Because when I was testing I wanted to know that the application had started and was working before the sage notebook server started. That's the only reason. Ideally it would be some sort of progress/starting up message. I haven't done that yet.
> From still within its own /Volume, I tried it first.
> Starting a Sage terminal from the drop-down menu doesn't seem to work
> properly
>
> IOError: [Errno 30] Read-only file system: '/Volumes/SageApp/Sage.app/
> Contents/Resources/sage/local/lib/libcdd.la'
That's probably because it tries to write the log file inside the Application. I guess that should probably be changed to write to the standard OS X log place (I'm not sure where that is).
> it also opened a second empty Terminal window. And you still have to
> close it when you're done :)
Opening a second Terminal window is because Terminal wasn't open, so it opens it by itself (unless you're seeing something different than me). I don't know how to get Terminal to close the window when finished, nor do I know if it's desirable. Unless of course you mean after you exit the shell in which case I agree and it's one of the reasons I don't use Terminal.app.
> Trying to start the server also didn't seem to work.
> Then I tried to copy it to my Desktop/ and it complained that there
> was another file named Sage (which there isn't, but there are several
> that begin with Sage or sage).
That sounds odd. Maybe it's related to below?
> So I made another folder to put it in, copied it there. The same
> thing happened, even though that folder was otherwise empty - message
> "You can’t copy “Sage” because it has the same name as another item on
> the destination volume, and that volume doesn’t distinguish between
> upper- and lowercase letters in filenames"
> so I'm not sure what to do next. Weirdly, it copied a lot - about
> half - maybe through /local/bin but quit in the middle of that, and
> did not copy the actual ./sage script.
Very odd indeed. I use case-sensitive HFS which is not the default. It has caused me some problems in the past e.g. with Steam. It looks like this is probably the reverse problem happening. There must be two files somewhere that differ only by case--that seems like a very bad thing. I can't remember if I did a clean before the build, so there may be some cruft in the package causing the problem.
I have to go right now, but I will try and make a new version tonight and/or figure out the problem. Perhaps I will simply put up Sage.app, and you can move the sage folder manually. It would be a much smaller download that way.
> So I trashed that, and tried opening the application from the disk
> image again. I went to Start Server... and then went to open
> Notebook, but it just went to http://localhost:8000/ but never
> actually showed anything. Or maybe I wasn't patient enough, as the
> README implies?
It shouldn't take forever, but it does take a long time. When the server starts it should open a window.
-Ivan
singular seems to be the culprit here as well:
: Sage.app : 0; find . | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z' | sort | uniq -d
./contents/resources/sage/local/bin/singular
: Sage.app : 0; md5 Contents/Resources/sage/local/bin/singular
MD5 (Contents/Resources/sage/local/bin/singular) = b103365ac3178e9938593b06a9cf727e
: Sage.app : 0; md5 Contents/Resources/sage/local/bin/Singular
MD5 (Contents/Resources/sage/local/bin/Singular) = b103365ac3178e9938593b06a9cf727e
So Singular and singular are the same file. At least it's not as bad as if they were different files, but it's a bad thing IMHO. It means that a binary distribution built on a case sensitive filesystem won't work on a case insensitive file system (because of the copying problems you saw).
In singular-3.1.0.4.p6/spkg-install I found:
# Lower case version is convenient.
$CP -f Singular singular
which seems to indicate that we create the link for "convenience". I'm not sure what that means. Is it ever called as singular anywhere? If so, then a binary distribution built on a case insensitive file system won't work on a case sensitive one.
Trac #1635 seems related, and what I see in spkg-install seems broken since it keys off of Darwin rather than case-sensitivity of the file system, but I haven't noticed any breakage from this (sage --singular starts at least). I'm not sure what I would have to do to see it though.
I *HATE* case insensitive file systems.
Based on these two it appears that I cannot create a sage binary distribution that will work for most OS X users. Well I guess I could build on a case-insensitive disk image...
It seems to me that we should at least mention that if you use a case sensitive file system on OS X you will have to build from scratch. Or we could provide yet another set of dmg's Either is less than optimal obviously. Any thoughts? Obviously we'll have to deal with this sort of thing as we move to Windows. In fact I can't even tell if NTFS is case sensitive or not based on:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/100108
Do we have any policies on stuff like this?
-Ivan
>>> So I made another folder to put it in, copied it there. The same
>>> thing happened, even though that folder was otherwise empty - message
>>> "You can’t copy “Sage” because it has the same name as another item on
>>> the destination volume, and that volume doesn’t distinguish between
>>> upper- and lowercase letters in filenames"
>>> so I'm not sure what to do next. Weirdly, it copied a lot - about
>>> half - maybe through /local/bin but quit in the middle of that, and
>>> did not copy the actual ./sage script.
>>
>> Very odd indeed. I use case-sensitive HFS which is not the default. It has caused me some problems in the past e.g. with Steam. It looks like this is probably the reverse problem happening. There must be two files somewhere that differ only by case--that seems like a very bad thing. I can't remember if I did a clean before the build, so there may be some cruft in the package causing the problem.
>
> I've had this problem copying regular Sage at times too... not
> reliably, but Singular vs. singular I think may have been the problem
> at the time. In fact, since the files in local/bin seem to have
> copied in alphabetical order, and the last three files copied seem to
> have been Singular, Singular-3-1-0, and TSingular (this last being out
> of order for some reason, but no others I can tell), I wouldn't be
> surprised if that were causing the trouble again.
See my other message.
>> I have to go right now, but I will try and make a new version tonight and/or figure out the problem. Perhaps I will simply put up Sage.app, and you can move the sage folder manually. It would be a much smaller download that way.
>
> At least for testing, that would certainly be a good idea.
Okay, I have another up as SageApp.dmg.
>>> So I trashed that, and tried opening the application from the disk
>>> image again. I went to Start Server... and then went to open
>>> Notebook, but it just went to http://localhost:8000/but never
>>> actually showed anything. Or maybe I wasn't patient enough, as the
>>> README implies?
>>
>> It shouldn't take forever, but it does take a long time. When the server starts it should open a window.
>
> This did not happen.
Hmm. Since it's read only, I imagine it had some problems. I can't think of what they might be though. It will probably be easier just to try a new version.
> Thanks - I think this definitely is well on the way to awesomeness.
Thanks. I'm glad you like it.
> If that is a word.
It is now :)
-Ivan