Well, biopython development is pretty active right now, so 1.51 will
have quite a few changes from the beta. There is still quite a lot of
discussion about what will be in 1.51 on their mailing list (http://
If you search on trac for "biopython", you can see all the previous
On Jul 27, 12:30 pm, tkeller <Thomas.E.Kel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a good plan. I downloaded your spkg and it installs fine
> and works as expected. I have added this information to your ticket,
> is there something else I should do for reviewing?
> Do you know what the proposed differences between the beta and 1.51
> On Jul 27, 12:30 am, bbarker <Brandon.Bar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Great, glad to see this! Thanks for the updated spkg.
> > On Jul 26, 9:47 pm, Marshall Hampton <hampto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Ok, I posted my spkg at:
> > > It would be great if you (tkeller) got a trac account, since currently
> > > -Marshall
> > > On Jul 26, 12:25 pm, Marshall Hampton <hampto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > Thanks for pointing that out. I have made a 1.51b spkg, but decided
> > > > Anyway if you have any interest in helping out, you should get a trac
> > > > I am excited about their cleanup too, I think with a little more work
> > > > -Marshall Hampton
> > > > On Jul 26, 12:05 pm, tkeller <Thomas.E.Kel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Thanks for all the recent work upgrading the base python distribution
> > > > > A side benefit to upgrading the spkg is that the last few patches
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.