Message from discussion Sage 4.0.rc0 released!
Received: by 10.150.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr248576ybz.14.1242962179118; Thu, 21
May 2009 20:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
rv:184.108.40.206) Gecko/2009042315 Firefox/3.0.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Subject: Re: Sage 4.0.rc0 released!
From: mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com>
To: sage-devel <email@example.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On May 21, 8:11=A0pm, John H Palmieri <jhpalmier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 21, 7:14=A0am, mabshoff <mabsh...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I gotta run to the airport, but sources and upgrade bits of 4.0.rc0
> > are in
> > =A0 =A0http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-4.0=
> > Once I get online I will post more info, but I am sure this will take
> > a couple hours. Sorry.
> > Cheers,
> > Michael
> On Intel Mac OS 10.5, 32-bit: an upgrade failed for reasons already
> reported here, and my attempts to fix it also failed. =A0A fresh install
> built fine and had a few doctest failures (with sage -testall -long):
> The following tests failed:
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/calculus/wester.py"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/graphs/graph_plot.py"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/assumptions.py"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx"
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/relation.py"
> Several of these are sorting issues, e.g.,
> File "/Applications/sage_builds/sage-4.0.rc0/devel/sage/sage/calculus/
> wester.py", line 212:
> =A0 =A0 sage: print list(sorted(assumptions()))
> =A0 =A0 [x > y, y > 0]
> =A0 =A0 [y > 0, x > y]
Yeah, Mike Hansen mentioned there were hashing issues.
> Other are numerical noise.
Yep, some of those are still around.
> =A0The one in graph_plot is
> libpng error: Image width or height is zero in IHDR
> leading to a runtime error.
Odd, I thought rlm fixed that one. Unless somehow a patch reverted
that one fix there might be an analog issue in the code.
> Let me know if you want more details for any of these.
I am in between flights and about to catch some sleep, but please post
a link to the test log. I will take a bunch of them with me and look
for common denominations, etc.
> =A0 John