Releasing sage-5.0

81 views
Skip to first unread message

Jeroen Demeyer

unread,
May 10, 2012, 11:58:31 AM5/10/12
to sage-r...@googlegroups.com, sage-devel
If nobody complains, I will finally release sage-5.0 (equal to the just
released sage-5.0.rc1) in the weekend.

Have a look at the release notes at
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.0/logs/sage-5.0.txt
and let me know if anything needs to be changed.

Justin C. Walker

unread,
May 10, 2012, 12:37:39 PM5/10/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
One minor issue: I noticed that, for 'rc0, on 10.6.8, GCC was built because the existing version (from Xcode 3.2.6) was too old.

That was a change from previous betas. Were there problems with this configuration?

--
Justin C. Walker
Curmudgeon-at-large
Director
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
----
186,000 Miles per Second
Not just a good idea:
it's the law!
----

R. Andrew Ohana

unread,
May 10, 2012, 5:11:28 PM5/10/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
GCC will always have to be built on OSX since they don't include
fortran, and the GCC spkg is replacing the fortran spkg.
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org



--
Andrew

Justin C. Walker

unread,
May 10, 2012, 7:35:21 PM5/10/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com

On May 10, 2012, at 14:11, "R. Andrew Ohana" <andrew...@gmail.com> wrote:

> GCC will always have to be built on OSX since they don't include
> fortran, and the GCC spkg is replacing the fortran spkg.

Ah. Thanks; that slipped by me while I was napping.

iPhone, therefore I am.

William Stein

unread,
May 10, 2012, 9:14:41 PM5/10/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Justin C. Walker <jus...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> On May 10, 2012, at 14:11, "R. Andrew Ohana" <andrew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> GCC will always have to be built on OSX since they don't include
>> fortran, and the GCC spkg is replacing the fortran spkg.

And I think it is *fantastic* that there is one less package in Sage
that is a non-source binary. To the best of my knowledge, I think the
only remaining non-source binary left in Sage is JMOL. (And at least
three.js + WebGL is a strategy for getting past that.)

>
> Ah.  Thanks; that slipped by me while I  was napping.
>
> iPhone, therefore I am.
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
> URL: http://www.sagemath.org



--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

Keshav Kini

unread,
May 11, 2012, 2:36:42 AM5/11/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> writes:
> And I think it is *fantastic* that there is one less package in Sage
> that is a non-source binary. To the best of my knowledge, I think the
> only remaining non-source binary left in Sage is JMOL. (And at least
> three.js + WebGL is a strategy for getting past that.)

+1, the less binary blobs the better :)

-Keshav

----
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !

Jan Groenewald

unread,
May 11, 2012, 2:46:45 AM5/11/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
Hi



I am still hoping someone can give me the build scripts and/or settings to create
binaries for Ubuntu, so that I can package them in a PPA.

Things like standard settings for i686, amd64, SAGE_FAT_BINARY (whatever that does)
and so on. I'm not sure how to compile a binary for standard CPU flags rather than for my
own.

I'd like to get Sage-5.0 packaged for Ubuntu 12.04 as soon as possible ;)

Regards,
Jan

--
  .~.
  /V\     Jan Groenewald
 /( )\    www.aims.ac.za
 ^^-^^


Jeroen Demeyer

unread,
May 11, 2012, 5:44:31 AM5/11/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
On 2012-05-10 18:37, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> One minor issue: I noticed that, for 'rc0, on 10.6.8, GCC was built because the existing version (from Xcode 3.2.6) was too old.
>
> That was a change from previous betas.
I don't think so. We didn't change anything related to OS X after beta13.

Justin C. Walker

unread,
May 11, 2012, 5:32:51 PM5/11/12
to sage-...@googlegroups.com
It was a long nap...

--
Justin C. Walker
Curmudgeon-at-large
--
Network, n., Difference between work
charged for and work done



Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages